向议员状告USCIS少发的请愿信模板，欢迎提建议# EB23 - 劳工卡
A*Z
1 楼
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDIzMazQXoAAIg-BPQ69xRMYxcl7H1-
PbKtwA9N6j8A/edit?usp=sharing
PbKtwA9N6j8A/edit?usp=sharing
j*u
2 楼
多谢！ 从没给议员写过信，开头是否需要提及个人情况说明是本选区居民呢？
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDIzMazQXoAAIg-BPQ69xRMYxcl7H1-
: PbKtwA9N6j8A/edit?usp=sharing
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDIzMazQXoAAIg-BPQ69xRMYxcl7H1-
: PbKtwA9N6j8A/edit?usp=sharing
A*Z
3 楼
谢谢建议。我修改了第一句。
【在 j****u 的大作中提到】
: 多谢！ 从没给议员写过信，开头是否需要提及个人情况说明是本选区居民呢？
【在 j****u 的大作中提到】
: 多谢！ 从没给议员写过信，开头是否需要提及个人情况说明是本选区居民呢？
l*n
4 楼
对，先提自己是本选区的居民
l*n
5 楼
niu今天下午已经给奥本发信了，也提到了跟当年诉讼案里法官的opinion。当然主要还
是促使他尽快放水。预计明天收到回信再update各位同学们。
我们也正在起草给uscis head的信件，直接询问2类名额一事。
这里我个人支持大家给自己选区的议员写信，敦促他们询问uscis短缺2类名额一事。人
多力量大，请大家都行动起来！模板都已经写好了，就是动动手指改几个字的事情了。
是促使他尽快放水。预计明天收到回信再update各位同学们。
我们也正在起草给uscis head的信件，直接询问2类名额一事。
这里我个人支持大家给自己选区的议员写信，敦促他们询问uscis短缺2类名额一事。人
多力量大，请大家都行动起来！模板都已经写好了，就是动动手指改几个字的事情了。
l*d
6 楼
支持，今天已经给我家选区的Representative发信了
a*g
7 楼
支持！
a*r
8 楼
支持!
【在 l*******n 的大作中提到】
: niu今天下午已经给奥本发信了，也提到了跟当年诉讼案里法官的opinion。当然主要还
: 是促使他尽快放水。预计明天收到回信再update各位同学们。
: 我们也正在起草给uscis head的信件，直接询问2类名额一事。
: 这里我个人支持大家给自己选区的议员写信，敦促他们询问uscis短缺2类名额一事。人
: 多力量大，请大家都行动起来！模板都已经写好了，就是动动手指改几个字的事情了。
【在 l*******n 的大作中提到】
: niu今天下午已经给奥本发信了，也提到了跟当年诉讼案里法官的opinion。当然主要还
: 是促使他尽快放水。预计明天收到回信再update各位同学们。
: 我们也正在起草给uscis head的信件，直接询问2类名额一事。
: 这里我个人支持大家给自己选区的议员写信，敦促他们询问uscis短缺2类名额一事。人
: 多力量大，请大家都行动起来！模板都已经写好了，就是动动手指改几个字的事情了。
D*s
9 楼
支持！
也感谢NIU和版花
也感谢NIU和版花
j*u
10 楼
还有个细节，要不要把国务院的奥本也一块儿放进去呢？奥本和移民局是一条绳上的蚂
蚱，而且奥本是订排期的，他不放水USCIS不可能主动求他放水。
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢建议。我修改了第一句。
蚱，而且奥本是订排期的，他不放水USCIS不可能主动求他放水。
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢建议。我修改了第一句。
A*Z
11 楼
版花建议问责移民局，奥本他们NIU正在交涉．
如果有足够多的人给议员写信，他们去问询移民局，那奥本也肯定知道风吹草动．毕竟
当年移民局和奥本的办公室都是被告．
【在 j****u 的大作中提到】
: 还有个细节，要不要把国务院的奥本也一块儿放进去呢？奥本和移民局是一条绳上的蚂
: 蚱，而且奥本是订排期的，他不放水USCIS不可能主动求他放水。
如果有足够多的人给议员写信，他们去问询移民局，那奥本也肯定知道风吹草动．毕竟
当年移民局和奥本的办公室都是被告．
【在 j****u 的大作中提到】
: 还有个细节，要不要把国务院的奥本也一块儿放进去呢？奥本和移民局是一条绳上的蚂
: 蚱，而且奥本是订排期的，他不放水USCIS不可能主动求他放水。
n*1
12 楼
支持一下，千里之行始于足下
x*8
13 楼
赞！
谁能在这里贴一下，
我的狗狗doc被封了，
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDIzMazQXoAAIg-BPQ69xRMYxcl7H1-
: PbKtwA9N6j8A/edit?usp=sharing
谁能在这里贴一下，
我的狗狗doc被封了，
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDIzMazQXoAAIg-BPQ69xRMYxcl7H1-
: PbKtwA9N6j8A/edit?usp=sharing
r*z
14 楼
缺少的名额是大约400吗？
r*z
15 楼
done. 给我所在区的议员发了信。
a*r
16 楼
Actual 2559 vs. Numeric Limit 2803, so the difference was 240?
【在 r*****z 的大作中提到】
: 缺少的名额是大约400吗？
【在 r*****z 的大作中提到】
: 缺少的名额是大约400吗？
n*1
17 楼
已经发给了NJ的参议员
n*1
18 楼
Dear (Congressman/Senator) (Last name):
I am an immigrant visa (green card) applicant living in New York’s nth
Congressional District, who has been approved in the employment-based second
preference category (EB-2). I am writing to bring to your attention that
the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) misallocated
visa numbers to this category in FY17, which has adversely affected me and
thousands of other petitioners.
This malfeasance has likely added 1+ year to the already-long 5 year backlog
. According to DOS’s FY17 Annual Report, the total number of green cards
issued to China-born EB2 was ~400 fewer than the numerical quota (2800) as
established in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (INA) and the
Immigration Act of 1990.
I find this to be highly unfair, at a time when the American public opinion
overwhelmingly supports skilled immigrants to come to fulfill their American
dream in this great nation. Yet the agency violated the first-come, first-
served principle of INA, and misallocated green cards due China-born
applicants.
Similar problems have occurred before, in FY08 and FY09, when the agency
allocated altogether 2300 fewer visa numbers to China-born EB-3 applicants.
In the ensuing lawsuit Zixiang Li et al. vs. John F. Kerry et al., Circuit
Judge Reinhardt on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
condemned the agency’s unfair practice:
“Instead, the government erroneously gave these visas to individuals from
other countries, many of whom had been waiting far less time for the same
type of visa than their Chinese counterparts … Plaintiffs, and thousands of
others like them, were prejudiced as a result, in that they were required
to wait far longer for their visas than other individuals who applied at the
same time.”
I urge you to inquire into this situation and support legislation
strengthening oversight in green card allocation.
Thank you for your consideration. I will be gladly available for answering
your questions.
Sincerely,
YOUR NAME
Street address
City, State, Zip code
I am an immigrant visa (green card) applicant living in New York’s nth
Congressional District, who has been approved in the employment-based second
preference category (EB-2). I am writing to bring to your attention that
the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) misallocated
visa numbers to this category in FY17, which has adversely affected me and
thousands of other petitioners.
This malfeasance has likely added 1+ year to the already-long 5 year backlog
. According to DOS’s FY17 Annual Report, the total number of green cards
issued to China-born EB2 was ~400 fewer than the numerical quota (2800) as
established in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (INA) and the
Immigration Act of 1990.
I find this to be highly unfair, at a time when the American public opinion
overwhelmingly supports skilled immigrants to come to fulfill their American
dream in this great nation. Yet the agency violated the first-come, first-
served principle of INA, and misallocated green cards due China-born
applicants.
Similar problems have occurred before, in FY08 and FY09, when the agency
allocated altogether 2300 fewer visa numbers to China-born EB-3 applicants.
In the ensuing lawsuit Zixiang Li et al. vs. John F. Kerry et al., Circuit
Judge Reinhardt on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
condemned the agency’s unfair practice:
“Instead, the government erroneously gave these visas to individuals from
other countries, many of whom had been waiting far less time for the same
type of visa than their Chinese counterparts … Plaintiffs, and thousands of
others like them, were prejudiced as a result, in that they were required
to wait far longer for their visas than other individuals who applied at the
same time.”
I urge you to inquire into this situation and support legislation
strengthening oversight in green card allocation.
Thank you for your consideration. I will be gladly available for answering
your questions.
Sincerely,
YOUR NAME
Street address
City, State, Zip code
a*r
19 楼
能说说为什么信里说少了400名额，而不是240吗？给议员写信或者在法院提出诉讼，数
字还是要搞准了
second
misallocated
backlog
【在 n*****1 的大作中提到】
: Dear (Congressman/Senator) (Last name):
: I am an immigrant visa (green card) applicant living in New York’s nth
: Congressional District, who has been approved in the employment-based second
: preference category (EB-2). I am writing to bring to your attention that
: the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) misallocated
: visa numbers to this category in FY17, which has adversely affected me and
: thousands of other petitioners.
: This malfeasance has likely added 1+ year to the already-long 5 year backlog
: . According to DOS’s FY17 Annual Report, the total number of green cards
: issued to China-born EB2 was ~400 fewer than the numerical quota (2800) as
字还是要搞准了
second
misallocated
backlog
【在 n*****1 的大作中提到】
: Dear (Congressman/Senator) (Last name):
: I am an immigrant visa (green card) applicant living in New York’s nth
: Congressional District, who has been approved in the employment-based second
: preference category (EB-2). I am writing to bring to your attention that
: the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) misallocated
: visa numbers to this category in FY17, which has adversely affected me and
: thousands of other petitioners.
: This malfeasance has likely added 1+ year to the already-long 5 year backlog
: . According to DOS’s FY17 Annual Report, the total number of green cards
: issued to China-born EB2 was ~400 fewer than the numerical quota (2800) as
A*Z
20 楼
抱歉，我把数字记错了。已经改成240。谢谢指正。
不过法院起诉数字要对，给议员写信其实没必要那么精确，如果议员真的发信去质询了
，那就已经达到目的了。我们写的什么都是一家之言，议员最多就是保持中立态度去询
问一下。
【在 a****r 的大作中提到】
: 能说说为什么信里说少了400名额，而不是240吗？给议员写信或者在法院提出诉讼，数
: 字还是要搞准了
:
: second
: misallocated
: backlog
不过法院起诉数字要对，给议员写信其实没必要那么精确，如果议员真的发信去质询了
，那就已经达到目的了。我们写的什么都是一家之言，议员最多就是保持中立态度去询
问一下。
【在 a****r 的大作中提到】
: 能说说为什么信里说少了400名额，而不是240吗？给议员写信或者在法院提出诉讼，数
: 字还是要搞准了
:
: second
: misallocated
: backlog
k*c
21 楼
支持！
j*u
22 楼
给众议员的信搞定。
给参议员发信有用吗？
每个州有两个参议员，如果发信得话发给哪个？
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: 抱歉，我把数字记错了。已经改成240。谢谢指正。
: 不过法院起诉数字要对，给议员写信其实没必要那么精确，如果议员真的发信去质询了
: ，那就已经达到目的了。我们写的什么都是一家之言，议员最多就是保持中立态度去询
: 问一下。
给参议员发信有用吗？
每个州有两个参议员，如果发信得话发给哪个？
【在 A****Z 的大作中提到】
: 抱歉，我把数字记错了。已经改成240。谢谢指正。
: 不过法院起诉数字要对，给议员写信其实没必要那么精确，如果议员真的发信去质询了
: ，那就已经达到目的了。我们写的什么都是一家之言，议员最多就是保持中立态度去询
: 问一下。
相关阅读
终于把140交了is it necessary to request PP for EB2->EB3 downgrade case?yuki1010请进来，你要的老赫旧作一直查不到online case status,正常么？09/10年PD 485 PENDING降级实例：EB2->3 with PP, i140 approv催绿好贴赏析和找议员帖NIW最近有批的吗USCIS网上改地址不靠谱EB3实批到哪儿了？发现一个规律485期间额外兼职请教双飞终于收到receipt了，TSC 降级的似乎不需要140 PP给配偶申请绿卡用结婚公证还是结婚证公证？Perm 被audit 有几个问题请教一直听说nsc TSC, 是不是还有 vermonet ?TSC还慢么？2月10号寄出 刚刚收到receipt请问可以电话查询485的RECEIPT #吗？公司裁员多长时间以内不能打PERM？