秀才遇到兵-My Proof - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Economics - 经济

秀才遇到兵-My Proof

秀才遇到兵-My Proof# Economics - 经济

h*s2002-11-18 08:11

1 楼

看看上面的争论，感觉只有一个，秀才遇到兵，
为了节省来晚者的时间，做如下总结
Definition1: A={秀才|有逻辑的人}
Definition2: B={兵|complement of A}
Axiom1:大家受了多年的教育，有对逻辑，修养高低的判别能力
Axiom2:逻辑，修养高低和所在学校是不是top10无关
Theorem: some debaters are included in B
Proof:
Step1：
1:说林毅夫没在一流期刊上发过文章，结果被disporve后转而质疑
Econ Deve & Cult Change。无逻辑表现，一方面接受了AER, JPE是一流期刊，一方面
忘记了林毅夫不管发在AER,JPE还是EDCC上的文章都属于发展经济学
（建议，批评林毅夫要抓住他做了吴征答辩主席一事）
2：认为林毅夫不算active researcher,那你怎么解释钱颖一论文数量在同时期，同样
选择样本里还低于林毅夫
Publication from 1990-2000
http://student.ulb.ac.be/~tcoupe/update/top100

v*s2002-11-18 08:11

2 楼

you got lots time in detailing your argument online. good for you. reminding
me a lot lucky people who get time online showing off their logic on this BBS.
told you i'm too lazy to type details like that. all right. let's assume you
were right, you are right all the time. what's your point then?
my point is China has no economics.
give me your rank of Lin among world economists. save me that top 1000 ranking
crap. look among your faculty memebers, see if anyone is better than lin.
assuming lin i

【在 h*s 的大作中提到】

: 看看上面的争论，感觉只有一个，秀才遇到兵，
: 为了节省来晚者的时间，做如下总结
: Definition1: A={秀才|有逻辑的人}
: Definition2: B={兵|complement of A}
: Axiom1:大家受了多年的教育，有对逻辑，修养高低的判别能力
: Axiom2:逻辑，修养高低和所在学校是不是top10无关
: Theorem: some debaters are included in B
: Proof:
: Step1：
: 1:说林毅夫没在一流期刊上发过文章，结果被disporve后转而质疑

f*x2002-11-18 08:11

3 楼

agree, hehe, many ppl studying here did not show enough respect to those stay
in home. actually there are quite some very good scholars, though they may
never publish any papers in english journals. 【在 hbs (hbs) 的大作中提到: 】
的
国
学
经

q*i2002-11-18 08:11

4 楼

well said. foundamentally, I have a problem with people who speak loudly
on a subject when they appear to have no clue. For example, how many of us
have uptodate first-hand knowledge as to how each econ program in
China functions now? or what researches the Chinese economists are working
on? or do we know whom they are? At least no one has shown even rudimentry
understanding of that. Yet, everyone jumps in belittling those researchers
in china, which might have been a marginally accepted manner

【在 f*****x 的大作中提到】

: agree, hehe, many ppl studying here did not show enough respect to those stay
: in home. actually there are quite some very good scholars, though they may
: never publish any papers in english journals. 【在 hbs (hbs) 的大作中提到: 】
: 的
: 国
: 学
: 经