avatar
v*a
2
when economists say they are doing science, physists laugh;
when physists say they are genius, mathematicians laugh.
Greed is great.
economics =/= economy
I know some Chicago economics PhDs working for government not doing
"academic" research.
like it or not, people do differentiate others based on school/subject/
money/ etc. Chicago, MIT, Harvard, Stanford, these big 4 ARE snobbish.
like it or not.
LIFE IS LIFE.
avatar
r*s
3

No more than old cliche. Check this out:
Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?
American Psychologist, 42(2), 443-455.
//don't know what you mean.
These are based on the assumption that all people are after the same
things, which ignored the vast range of individual differences in terms
of preferences and life priority. Not all things are compared against
the criteria economists like.
//hehe, deep.

【在 v******a 的大作中提到】
: when economists say they are doing science, physists laugh;
: when physists say they are genius, mathematicians laugh.
: Greed is great.
: economics =/= economy
: I know some Chicago economics PhDs working for government not doing
: "academic" research.
: like it or not, people do differentiate others based on school/subject/
: money/ etc. Chicago, MIT, Harvard, Stanford, these big 4 ARE snobbish.
: like it or not.
: LIFE IS LIFE.

avatar
i*s
4
HOW HARD IS HARD SCIENCE, HOW SOFT IS SOFT SCIENCE? The Empirical
Cumulativeness of Research
Larry V. Hedges (1987, American Psychologist)
People tend to think social sciences are softer science, compared to natural
science, which is more cumulative. The author first differentiates the concept
cumulativeness in the scientific field into two types. One is conceptual or
theoretical cumulativeness, which means in the broadest sense scientific
results are cumulative if empirical laws and theoretical

【在 r******s 的大作中提到】
:
: No more than old cliche. Check this out:
: Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?
: American Psychologist, 42(2), 443-455.
: //don't know what you mean.
: These are based on the assumption that all people are after the same
: things, which ignored the vast range of individual differences in terms
: of preferences and life priority. Not all things are compared against
: the criteria economists like.
: //hehe, deep.

avatar
i*s
5
This is just a summary of the original paper, which is not available online.
The summary is from
http://www.gsia.cmu.edu/andrew/mf4f/work/rm/html/hedges.html, summitted by
Wendy Li.

concept
experimental
used
in
example,
used
sciences,
the
methods
it

【在 i***s 的大作中提到】
: HOW HARD IS HARD SCIENCE, HOW SOFT IS SOFT SCIENCE? The Empirical
: Cumulativeness of Research
: Larry V. Hedges (1987, American Psychologist)
: People tend to think social sciences are softer science, compared to natural
: science, which is more cumulative. The author first differentiates the concept
: cumulativeness in the scientific field into two types. One is conceptual or
: theoretical cumulativeness, which means in the broadest sense scientific
: results are cumulative if empirical laws and theoretical

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。