Redian新闻
>
请教:关于uncertainty。。。
avatar
请教:关于uncertainty。。。# Economics - 经济
k*g
1
现在的literautre对待uncertainty的方式是actors know that they don't know. 可是
如果发生了states don't know they don't
know的情况,怎把把它formalize到rationalist 的framework 中呢?
avatar
f*x
2
you may find savage's book and kreps' notes on choice theory helpful, though i
am not sure. There are a few guys working on this kind stuff, but veyr
theoretical. David Ahn, a phd student, in GSB is working on sth related. you
can try to google it. 【 在 kzeng (。。。) 的大作中提到: 】
avatar
k*g
3
多谢啊,我在想能不能用这种方式把unanticripated consequence 引入rationalist
framework, 就是说rationality conditioned by belief, 或者说在given belief的情
况下谈论rationality,而unanticipated consequence的原因是belief的错误。。。

i


【在 f*****x 的大作中提到】
: you may find savage's book and kreps' notes on choice theory helpful, though i
: am not sure. There are a few guys working on this kind stuff, but veyr
: theoretical. David Ahn, a phd student, in GSB is working on sth related. you
: can try to google it. 【 在 kzeng (。。。) 的大作中提到: 】
: 是

avatar
f*x
4
not sure how to distinguish them formally. according to harsanyi's moethod, u
can always assign ur belief to anything could happen. it is difficult to model
unanticipated consequence. have u searched bounded rationality literature or
recent development in behaviour econo? 【 在 kzeng (。。。) 的大作中提到: 】

though
you
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。