美如画，海美迪之类的能成为widi receiver吗？ - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Hardware - 计算机硬件

美如画，海美迪之类的能成为widi receiver吗？

美如画，海美迪之类的能成为widi receiver吗？# Hardware - 计算机硬件

n*t2013-03-04 08:03

1 楼

EB1B CASE:
background:
11 English papers (5 as first author)
3 Chinese papers (1 as first author)
Journal impact factors are between 2-5.
26 conference presentations
4 invited talks
1 invited book review
1 NIH panel review
13 reviews for 4 journals
a lot of media report including New York Times, Washington Post, China Daily
, Iran Daily, Times of India etc (with name reported, the media report
focuses on my whole study instead of just mention a few sentence)
9 reference letters (6 from independe

q*i2013-03-04 08:03

2 楼

刷机后有简单的android系统，不知道有没有apps能实现widi

R*n2013-03-04 08:03

3 楼

claim 四点可行，你的citation？如果比较多的话，更要claim authorship。

A*r2013-03-04 08:03

4 楼

media report不是EB1b其中一条吧，所以只是用来补充contribution的。所以你这种情
况只是claim三条。很strong。

c*e2013-03-04 08:03

5 楼

跟我情况很类似，开始也担心claim多了
结果是顺利批准了，所以看材料准备情况，好的话在tsc问题不大

【在 n*****t 的大作中提到】

: EB1B CASE:
: background:
: 11 English papers (5 as first author)
: 3 Chinese papers (1 as first author)
: Journal impact factors are between 2-5.
: 26 conference presentations
: 4 invited talks
: 1 invited book review
: 1 NIH panel review
: 13 reviews for 4 journals

n*t2013-03-04 08:03

6 楼

律师把media report放在：
(C) Published material in professional publications written by others
about the alien’s work in the academic field, including title, date, and
author of the material, and any necessary translation;
我的独立引用次数是91次，其中29次中文，62次英文。律师把它放在了
V. Other Comparable Evidence
觉得怪怪的。这是个年轻的律师，我对他真有点不放心。感觉整个信写的很一般。

A*r2013-03-04 08:03

7 楼

It is right.
should be used to strengthen contribution and authorship.
这是个年轻的律师，我对他真有点不放心。感觉整个信写的很一般。

【在 n*****t 的大作中提到】

: 律师把media report放在：
: (C) Published material in professional publications written by others
: about the alien’s work in the academic field, including title, date, and
: author of the material, and any necessary translation;
: 我的独立引用次数是91次，其中29次中文，62次英文。律师把它放在了
: V. Other Comparable Evidence
: 觉得怪怪的。这是个年轻的律师，我对他真有点不放心。感觉整个信写的很一般。

n*t2013-03-04 08:03

8 楼

刚才见一律是把CITATION移到contribution或者authorship底下。他不同意。下面是他
的回复：
This is unncecessary to move, as these things don't necessarily fit into "
significant original contributions". They are supplemental in nature, and
the citations record is aimed at showing overall international recognition,
and so is essentially beyond any of the listed criteria. It is fine as is,
the weight of the evidence is what is most critical. Thank you!
大家觉得这个律师的能力可靠吗？要听他的意见吗？谢谢啦

【在 n*****t 的大作中提到】

R*n2013-03-04 08:03

9 楼

那就按律师的意思吧，你的case很强，问题不大。