Redian新闻
>
求助: 6月filed EB1A(TSC),1月PP,刚刚收到RFE by IO 1063
avatar
求助: 6月filed EB1A(TSC),1月PP,刚刚收到RFE by IO 1063# Immigration - 落地生根
l*u
1
LD今天刚刚收到了RFE如下。
Documentation to establish that you will continue to work in your claimed
area of expertise
It must be shown whether the beneficiary will continue working in the
claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that the
beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field. The
statement you provided to show you intend to work in the field was not
sufficient as it was lacking any specific details. Please submit evidence
that the beneficiary is coming to the United States to continue work in the
field. The work must be in the field in which the beneficiary has garnered
sustained national or international acclaim. Evidence that may be submitted
to satisfy this requirement includes, but is not limited to:
Letters from current or prospective employers;
Employment contracts; or
A statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how they intent to
continue work in the United States.
XM1063
Claim了 contribution, authorship and review.奇怪的是rfe里没有提到这三条啊。
黑体只有我上面提到的那一条。 不过里面也下划线强调Note,however, the
petitioner is responsible for providing evidence that best shows that the
beneficiary meets all requirements.
LD条件不强,所以很奇怪是不是上面三条都没有达到要求啊。我们应该怎么回复呢。多
谢大家帮忙!
avatar
J*g
2
看来回复个employment verification letter就可以了
问题不大,GXGX
avatar
l*t
3
provide what the IO asked. Bless

发信人: longshu (shu), 信区: Immigration
标 题: 求助: 6月filed EB1A(TSC),1月PP,刚刚收到RFE by IO 1063
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 25 18:48:05 2011, 美东)
LD今天刚刚收到了RFE如下。
Documentation to establish that you will continue to work in your claimed
area of expertise
It must be shown whether the beneficiary will continue working in the
claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that the
beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field. The
statement you provided to show you intend to work in the field was not
sufficient as it was lacking any specific details. Please submit evidence
that the beneficiary is coming to the United States to continue work in the
field. The work must be in the field in which the beneficiary has garnered
sustained national or international acclaim. Evidence that may be submitted
to satisfy this requirement includes, but is not limited to:
Letters from current or prospective employers;
Employment contracts; or
A statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how they intent to
continue work in the United States.
XM1063
Claim了 contribution, authorship and review.奇怪的是rfe里没有提到这三条啊。
黑体只有我上面提到的那一条。 不过里面也下划线强调Note,however, the
petitioner is responsible for providing evidence that best shows that the
beneficiary meets all requirements.
LD条件不强,所以很奇怪是不是上面三条都没有达到要求啊。我们应该怎么回复呢。多
谢大家帮忙!

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: LD今天刚刚收到了RFE如下。
: Documentation to establish that you will continue to work in your claimed
: area of expertise
: It must be shown whether the beneficiary will continue working in the
: claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that the
: beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field. The
: statement you provided to show you intend to work in the field was not
: sufficient as it was lacking any specific details. Please submit evidence
: that the beneficiary is coming to the United States to continue work in the
: field. The work must be in the field in which the beneficiary has garnered

avatar
r*t
4
nod, gxgx 2

【在 J*****g 的大作中提到】
: 看来回复个employment verification letter就可以了
: 问题不大,GXGX

avatar
l*u
5
谢谢!我们在之前已经提交了employment verification letter,这次回复要不要附上
新的citation和reviewing,但是我的citation从~50次涨到~80次,review从9次涨到12
次,提citation和reviewing会不会有反作用
avatar
r*t
6
Give what IO asks for!
"The statement you provided to show you intend to work in the field was not
sufficient as it was lacking any specific details."
I think you need to provide a letter with specific job function/description
if you didn't include those info in the previous version.

12

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢!我们在之前已经提交了employment verification letter,这次回复要不要附上
: 新的citation和reviewing,但是我的citation从~50次涨到~80次,review从9次涨到12
: 次,提citation和reviewing会不会有反作用

avatar
a*s
7
Note,however, the petitioner is responsible for providing evidence that best
shows that the beneficiary meets all requirements.这句要命呀!相当于什么都
没说,有什么都说了,IO想咋办就咋办,看他心情和人品了,也看你前半生做了多少善
事了。
avatar
l*u
8
因为是弱case,所以心里没底。谢谢大家
avatar
G*0
9
Bless~
avatar
f*n
10
我的rfe也要求了这项,但是我claim的一条也没有提到。我请了律师,律师说很可能是
最近的新要求,这种rfe可能会意味io还没有真正处理我们的case。
希望最近被rfe的xdjm都上来报告一下,是不是大家收到的rfe都一样。
avatar
f*n
11
big big big bless to you.
avatar
l*u
12
我在national lab工作,不知道是不是因为在政府工作,我的offer letter 只给了两
年时间(H1b). 这句话是从offer letter 里摘抄的:"We are please to confirm our
offer of an Excepted Appointment not to exceed September 26, 2011 in the
laboratory of XXX" 我觉得这封信应该不是Employment contracts. 我是不是要联系
HR?
弱弱的问一下,什么是Employment contracts?谢谢大家!
avatar
l*u
13
我在national lab工作,不知道是不是因为在政府工作,我的offer letter 只给了两
年时间(H1b). 这句话是从offer letter 里摘抄的:"We are please to confirm our
offer of an Excepted Appointment not to exceed September 26, 2011 in the
laboratory of XXX" 我觉得这封信应该不是Employment contracts. 我是不是要联系
HR?
弱弱的问一下,什么是Employment contracts?谢谢大家!
avatar
l*u
14
不好意思,发了两遍
avatar
W*R
15
就是你的合同。
avatar
o*6
16
Is it that the computer IO gave a popular response!
IO is human being without 4 hands.
So they do not like so many cases.

【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 我的rfe也要求了这项,但是我claim的一条也没有提到。我请了律师,律师说很可能是
: 最近的新要求,这种rfe可能会意味io还没有真正处理我们的case。
: 希望最近被rfe的xdjm都上来报告一下,是不是大家收到的rfe都一样。

avatar
y*u
17
bless!!
i am depressed since we just pp without detailed future research plan. we
only provided employment verification letter too.

the

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: LD今天刚刚收到了RFE如下。
: Documentation to establish that you will continue to work in your claimed
: area of expertise
: It must be shown whether the beneficiary will continue working in the
: claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that the
: beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field. The
: statement you provided to show you intend to work in the field was not
: sufficient as it was lacking any specific details. Please submit evidence
: that the beneficiary is coming to the United States to continue work in the
: field. The work must be in the field in which the beneficiary has garnered

avatar
g*1
18
bless and good luck
avatar
l*u
19
关于rfe.
最后提交了
1.HR开的Employment Verification Letter.
2.Offer Letter
3.3 months paychecks
4.Information about the national lab
5.Supporting letter from supervisor
6.Detailed Research Statement
7.Supporting letter from the former postdoc who is now an assistant
professor
avatar
l*9
20
恭喜恭喜

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: 关于rfe.
: 最后提交了
: 1.HR开的Employment Verification Letter.
: 2.Offer Letter
: 3.3 months paychecks
: 4.Information about the national lab
: 5.Supporting letter from supervisor
: 6.Detailed Research Statement
: 7.Supporting letter from the former postdoc who is now an assistant
: professor

avatar
i*u
21
gxgx!!
avatar
b*r
22
cong
avatar
l*t
23
congrats!

发信人: longshu (shu), 信区: Immigration
标 题: UPDATE: APPROVED. 求助: 6月filed EB1A(TSC),1月PP,刚刚收到RFE by
IO 1063
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 25 18:48:05 2011, 美东)
Update:今天收到Approval Notice了。
非常感谢大家的帮助,尤其是fancychen和laoda555的耐心建议。
Timeline:
6/11/2010 提交。
1月初实在等不下去交了pp.
01/20/2011 等来了rfe
02/18/2011 回复了rfe
02/24/2011 批准
今天在线状态变成了approved,同时收到了信。
Background:
2008 graduated from a US university, majored in chemistry. Now a postdoc at
a national lab.
Paper:20
Citation:60
Review:9 for 4 journals (1 Canadian, 3 British Journals)
Claimed: Contribution, Authorship and Review.
DIYed and learnt a lot from this board. Sorry don't have baozi.
LD今天刚刚收到了RFE如下。
Documentation to establish that you will continue to work in your claimed
area of expertise
It must be shown whether the beneficiary will continue working in the
claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that the
beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field. The
statement you provided to show you intend to work in the field was not
sufficient as it was lacking any specific details. Please submit evidence
that the beneficiary is coming to the United States to continue work in the
field. The work must be in the field in which the beneficiary has garnered
sustained national or international acclaim. Evidence that may be submitted
to satisfy this requirement includes, but is not limited to:
Letters from current or prospective employers;
Employment contracts; or
A statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how they intent to
continue work in the United States.
XM1063
Claim了 contribution, authorship and review.奇怪的是rfe里没有提到这三条啊。
黑体只有我上面提到的那一条。 不过里面也下划线强调Note,however, the
petitioner is responsible for providing evidence that best shows that the
beneficiary meets all requirements.
LD条件不强,所以很奇怪是不是上面三条都没有达到要求啊。我们应该怎么回复呢。多
谢大家帮忙!

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: 关于rfe.
: 最后提交了
: 1.HR开的Employment Verification Letter.
: 2.Offer Letter
: 3.3 months paychecks
: 4.Information about the national lab
: 5.Supporting letter from supervisor
: 6.Detailed Research Statement
: 7.Supporting letter from the former postdoc who is now an assistant
: professor

avatar
I*I
24
gong xi

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: 关于rfe.
: 最后提交了
: 1.HR开的Employment Verification Letter.
: 2.Offer Letter
: 3.3 months paychecks
: 4.Information about the national lab
: 5.Supporting letter from supervisor
: 6.Detailed Research Statement
: 7.Supporting letter from the former postdoc who is now an assistant
: professor

avatar
g*r
25
Cong!

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: 关于rfe.
: 最后提交了
: 1.HR开的Employment Verification Letter.
: 2.Offer Letter
: 3.3 months paychecks
: 4.Information about the national lab
: 5.Supporting letter from supervisor
: 6.Detailed Research Statement
: 7.Supporting letter from the former postdoc who is now an assistant
: professor

avatar
c*t
26
恭喜恭喜
avatar
r*q
27
恭喜
avatar
l*t
28
thanks

【在 l*****u 的大作中提到】
: 关于rfe.
: 最后提交了
: 1.HR开的Employment Verification Letter.
: 2.Offer Letter
: 3.3 months paychecks
: 4.Information about the national lab
: 5.Supporting letter from supervisor
: 6.Detailed Research Statement
: 7.Supporting letter from the former postdoc who is now an assistant
: professor

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。