EB1b:有一个问题一直不解? - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Immigration - 落地生根

EB1b:有一个问题一直不解?

EB1b:有一个问题一直不解?# Immigration - 落地生根

l*32011-10-21 07:10

1 楼

fresh phD刚开始找工作，被一个猎头公司联系上，这么早就让提供推荐人得信息，可
以给吗？谢谢

g*M2011-10-21 07:10

2 楼

只需claim 两项,为什么大家都要上contribution? 不可以只申请authorship 和
review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?

l*o2011-10-21 07:10

3 楼

为什么不呢？
这是猎头公司例行公事. 不要给现在的老板就好了。

可以给吗？谢谢

【在 l******3 的大作中提到】

: fresh phD刚开始找工作，被一个猎头公司联系上，这么早就让提供推荐人得信息，可
: 以给吗？谢谢

T*y2011-10-21 07:10

4 楼

In the current two step evaluation standard, the IOs first evaluate
whether the claims meet the face value of the requirements, such as the
numbers of publications, citations, etc; then the IOs evaluate whether
the case is strong enough overall, or whether the case gives them enough
impression that this applicant is indeed extraordinary or outstanding.
The second step is called totality evaluation.
The approval of a case requires both face value satisfaction and
totality satisfaction.
The totality evaluation is somewhat very similar to contribution
evaluation, namely, unless the contribution requirement is met, the
totality won't be met. In the extreme case though, I saw maybe only one
case on this board that an applicant met all 3 claims including
contribution on the face value, but his totality was not met, and his
case was RFEed or something. In the common cases, contribution is most
often questioned in RFEs.
So contribution is the most important thing to be claimed and supported
for both EB1A and EB1B.

【在 g**M 的大作中提到】

: 只需claim 两项,为什么大家都要上contribution? 不可以只申请authorship 和
: review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?

I*12011-10-21 07:10

5 楼

review多少算够没有准数

【在 g**M 的大作中提到】

: 只需claim 两项,为什么大家都要上contribution? 不可以只申请authorship 和
: review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?

g*x2011-10-21 07:10

6 楼

eb1b是只需要满足两条就够了，但是两条都需要达到两步法totality的要求，那就是申
请者要被 Internationally recogized as an OUTSTANDING researcher。
一个是internationallly recognized, 一个是outstanding.要证明这两点如果不说你
做了什么贡献，比较难说通怎么outstanding, 能internationally recognized,所以功
课总要做的，而且这样写逻辑比较通顺。
当然你要是有足够强的证据支持着两条，我觉得也是可以的。