求建议兼1b评估:被击倒在起跑线上了# Immigration - 落地生根
p*i
1 楼
背景：
computer engineering major, networking方向
2009 US Phd. 现postdoc两年，给了assistant specialist title
5 journals, (3 first author,1ToN，1ACM CCR，1computer networks Elsevier）2
second author in Transaction on Wireless communications，13 conference
proceedings, (没有牛会，大多是wcnc, icc etc.) 8 first author, 2 posters, 2
tech reports
Google Scholar reports only 45 citations in total, 30 independent
review: 50+ for 3 journals, 5 conferences. 主要来自两journals, 老板是editor.
有一个 Exemplary Reviewer for IEEE Communication Letters 2010
1 pending patent
2 time TPC member 2 time session chair
Phd及薄厚期间的项目都是Boeing的，应该可以要到推荐信，不知道有没有用。
有很多来信要code的，可是因为Boeing项目不允许release code,估计少了不少
citations.
推荐信还没准备,打算美国3，澳大利亚1，欧洲1，印度1，中国1/2
因为不是tenure track faculty，申请EB1B需要学校批准。结果学校拿去给关系律所评
估，杯具了。没被USCIS RFE, 先被律师RFE了，sigh。下面是律师的评估，求建议如
何argue.
Dr. xx has only held a Ph.D. for 2 years. The USCIS places very little
weight on cases where the beneficiary has fewer than 4-5 years of post-
doctoral research. This short post-doctoral period will present a major
challenge in and of itself. （这个貌似有人说从发第一篇paper开始算，有官方/权
威出处么？）But in addition, please note that Dr. xx is the author of only 3
journal papers (直接忽略我的2作journal),which is a negligible amount
according to USCIS's expectations. (USCIS will ask the very reasonable
question, "How is it that this person can be said to be of international
acclaim and a major voice or influence in his field with only a few journal
publications to his name?") (这个USCIS's expectations 是多少呀？)
while Dr. xx has more listings under "conference proceedings", please note
that such activities receive little to no weight from the USCIS, while
journal papers and book chapters receive a lot of weight. (这个是真的么？会
议如此不堪么？大家都是journal？怎么argue呀)Also, please note that IEEE is
not considered an elite society by the USCIS, so Dr. xx's membership in IEEE
will receive little to no weight.（nnd, 我只是列在CV里，又没有打算claim.律
师有病!）接着还攻击了我的两个travel grants，也是列在CV里，没打算claim的。最
后来了句：Overall, there are significant dearth of evidence to suggest that
Dr. xx has, at this stage of career, amassed the credentials and original
research achievements necessary to be classified as an "outstanding
researcher". 无语了，是不是我真的不行呀。求评估及建议。 谢谢。
computer engineering major, networking方向
2009 US Phd. 现postdoc两年，给了assistant specialist title
5 journals, (3 first author,1ToN，1ACM CCR，1computer networks Elsevier）2
second author in Transaction on Wireless communications，13 conference
proceedings, (没有牛会，大多是wcnc, icc etc.) 8 first author, 2 posters, 2
tech reports
Google Scholar reports only 45 citations in total, 30 independent
review: 50+ for 3 journals, 5 conferences. 主要来自两journals, 老板是editor.
有一个 Exemplary Reviewer for IEEE Communication Letters 2010
1 pending patent
2 time TPC member 2 time session chair
Phd及薄厚期间的项目都是Boeing的，应该可以要到推荐信，不知道有没有用。
有很多来信要code的，可是因为Boeing项目不允许release code,估计少了不少
citations.
推荐信还没准备,打算美国3，澳大利亚1，欧洲1，印度1，中国1/2
因为不是tenure track faculty，申请EB1B需要学校批准。结果学校拿去给关系律所评
估，杯具了。没被USCIS RFE, 先被律师RFE了，sigh。下面是律师的评估，求建议如
何argue.
Dr. xx has only held a Ph.D. for 2 years. The USCIS places very little
weight on cases where the beneficiary has fewer than 4-5 years of post-
doctoral research. This short post-doctoral period will present a major
challenge in and of itself. （这个貌似有人说从发第一篇paper开始算，有官方/权
威出处么？）But in addition, please note that Dr. xx is the author of only 3
journal papers (直接忽略我的2作journal),which is a negligible amount
according to USCIS's expectations. (USCIS will ask the very reasonable
question, "How is it that this person can be said to be of international
acclaim and a major voice or influence in his field with only a few journal
publications to his name?") (这个USCIS's expectations 是多少呀？)
while Dr. xx has more listings under "conference proceedings", please note
that such activities receive little to no weight from the USCIS, while
journal papers and book chapters receive a lot of weight. (这个是真的么？会
议如此不堪么？大家都是journal？怎么argue呀)Also, please note that IEEE is
not considered an elite society by the USCIS, so Dr. xx's membership in IEEE
will receive little to no weight.（nnd, 我只是列在CV里，又没有打算claim.律
师有病!）接着还攻击了我的两个travel grants，也是列在CV里，没打算claim的。最
后来了句：Overall, there are significant dearth of evidence to suggest that
Dr. xx has, at this stage of career, amassed the credentials and original
research achievements necessary to be classified as an "outstanding
researcher". 无语了，是不是我真的不行呀。求评估及建议。 谢谢。
