被 NOID了,请大家帮忙想想办法# Immigration - 落地生根
l*d
1 楼
附上简单背景,化学生物学专业,九篇文章,一篇science (非一作), 两篇JACS(一
作一篇),两篇JBC (一作一篇), 另外四篇3-5分的文章,不过大部分是最近两年发的,
加一个conference和book chapter。就是文章都比较新,交的时候citation只有80 ,
报道很多,science的工作分别被science和nature 这两个顶级杂志highlight,同时被
chemical& engineering news, royal chemical society, sciencedaily等多家媒体报
道,大部分有我名字,不过主要是老板。还有一篇文章被选为VIP paper和Inside Cover
。没有单独claim媒体报道,这些统统被用来支持contribution。Review比较多,有四
十次, 20个journal, 其中IF3-5的大约有10篇。Claim了contribution, authorship
and judge of the work of others。有5封推荐信(3个独立)还有一封editor的支持信。 找的律师。
12月19号PP寄到TSC的,一直没有消息,今天收到信,发现实际上12月28号就被直接
NOID了。
具体内容如下:
IO 承认了
1. Judge of the work of others
2. contribution
3. Authorship.
但是
While the beneficiary has participated in judging the work of others, the
beneficiary has not established that it is his standing in the filed as one
of that small percentage who has risen to the very top of his field that led
to his being selected as a reviewer for the work of others.....
Additionally, although no offer of employment is required for this
calssfication, it must be established that the beneficiary is coming to US
to continue work in their field of expertise. Please submit evidence that
the beneficiary is coming to the US to continue work in his filed of
expertise. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy this requirement
includes, but is not limited to:
Letter from current or prospective employers;
Employment contract........
Lastly, pursuant to section 291 of the INA, whenever any person makes an
application for an immigration benefit, they shall bear the burden of proof
to establish eligibility. Accordingly, the beneficiary must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence, in other words, that it is more likely than
not, that the beneficiary is fully qualified for the benefit sought..
最后只给了30+3 天,也就是1月30号是最后的期限,大家帮忙想想办法,先谢谢各位了。
作一篇),两篇JBC (一作一篇), 另外四篇3-5分的文章,不过大部分是最近两年发的,
加一个conference和book chapter。就是文章都比较新,交的时候citation只有80 ,
报道很多,science的工作分别被science和nature 这两个顶级杂志highlight,同时被
chemical& engineering news, royal chemical society, sciencedaily等多家媒体报
道,大部分有我名字,不过主要是老板。还有一篇文章被选为VIP paper和Inside Cover
。没有单独claim媒体报道,这些统统被用来支持contribution。Review比较多,有四
十次, 20个journal, 其中IF3-5的大约有10篇。Claim了contribution, authorship
and judge of the work of others。有5封推荐信(3个独立)还有一封editor的支持信。 找的律师。
12月19号PP寄到TSC的,一直没有消息,今天收到信,发现实际上12月28号就被直接
NOID了。
具体内容如下:
IO 承认了
1. Judge of the work of others
2. contribution
3. Authorship.
但是
While the beneficiary has participated in judging the work of others, the
beneficiary has not established that it is his standing in the filed as one
of that small percentage who has risen to the very top of his field that led
to his being selected as a reviewer for the work of others.....
Additionally, although no offer of employment is required for this
calssfication, it must be established that the beneficiary is coming to US
to continue work in their field of expertise. Please submit evidence that
the beneficiary is coming to the US to continue work in his filed of
expertise. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy this requirement
includes, but is not limited to:
Letter from current or prospective employers;
Employment contract........
Lastly, pursuant to section 291 of the INA, whenever any person makes an
application for an immigration benefit, they shall bear the burden of proof
to establish eligibility. Accordingly, the beneficiary must prove by a
preponderance of the evidence, in other words, that it is more likely than
not, that the beneficiary is fully qualified for the benefit sought..
最后只给了30+3 天,也就是1月30号是最后的期限,大家帮忙想想办法,先谢谢各位了。