【update】RFE!# Immigration - 落地生根
S*g
1 楼
郁闷
receipt date May 17
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
律师居然比我还早收到ｒｆｅｌｅｔｔｅｒ．事实上，当天就收到了，这是传真吧？其次，查到了ＩＯ，靠我的ｃａｓｅ弱，我不否认。但是此ＩＯ的背景，也让我有喜有忧。ＦＦＥ的内容是：
1.继续在本领域工作
2.对美国有好处
3.original, significant contribution
我其实，1-2都已经有了。不知道为什么还要这个？
1102: RFE (2), Denial (0), Approval (2), Withdraw (0), Pending (0)
Notes: 2 non-pp got approved after RFE
纯手动录入主
要内容。请不吝赐教！
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific scholarly artistic
athletic or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major significance
in the field of endeavor. Simply going on record and explaining the
beneficiary's work is not sufficient to establish that the beneficiary's
contributions are of major significance.It is unclear if the beneficiary's
contribution is original or if the beneficiary has built upon others
research. Also, it does not appear that the beneficiary's contribution is
being widely implemented by others or that it has been widely cited. To
assist in determining wheather the beneficiary's contributions are original
and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
1. objective documentary evidence
2. documentary evidence that people currently consider the beneficiary's
work important
3. testimony and support letters from experts that discuss beneficiarys
contributions of major significance
4. evidence for widely cited and being implemented by others.
receipt date May 17
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
律师居然比我还早收到ｒｆｅｌｅｔｔｅｒ．事实上，当天就收到了，这是传真吧？其次，查到了ＩＯ，靠我的ｃａｓｅ弱，我不否认。但是此ＩＯ的背景，也让我有喜有忧。ＦＦＥ的内容是：
1.继续在本领域工作
2.对美国有好处
3.original, significant contribution
我其实，1-2都已经有了。不知道为什么还要这个？
1102: RFE (2), Denial (0), Approval (2), Withdraw (0), Pending (0)
Notes: 2 non-pp got approved after RFE
纯手动录入主
要内容。请不吝赐教！
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific scholarly artistic
athletic or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major significance
in the field of endeavor. Simply going on record and explaining the
beneficiary's work is not sufficient to establish that the beneficiary's
contributions are of major significance.It is unclear if the beneficiary's
contribution is original or if the beneficiary has built upon others
research. Also, it does not appear that the beneficiary's contribution is
being widely implemented by others or that it has been widely cited. To
assist in determining wheather the beneficiary's contributions are original
and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
1. objective documentary evidence
2. documentary evidence that people currently consider the beneficiary's
work important
3. testimony and support letters from experts that discuss beneficiarys
contributions of major significance
4. evidence for widely cited and being implemented by others.
