EB1A-追加PP后RFE-请大家帮助# Immigration - 落地生根
k*o
1 楼
收到RFE。
我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
Award
claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
internationally recognized awards for excellence in the field of physiology.
All of these awards were granted during the beneficiary’s doctoral
education or postdoctoral work, essentially when the beneficiary was still
gaining the education and experience required to enter the field of endeavor
. Generally, such honors are not considered to be nationally or
internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of
endeavor, because they are generally given to students or early career
professionals in the field and inherently exclude established professionals
who have already achieved excellence in the field of endeavor. This
criterion has not been met.（这条不符合，都是博士和博士后期间得的奖，不是给
有成就的人的）
To show that they are nationally or internationally recognized prizes or
awards for excellence in the field, the petitioner may submit documentary
evidence demonstrating the following:（让提供以下证据）
The criteria used to grant the prizes or awards;
The significance of the prizes or awards, to include the national or
international recognition that the prizes or awards share;
The reputation of the organization or panel granting the prizes or awards;
Who is considered for the prizes or awards, including the geographic scope
for which candidates may apply;
How many prizes or awards are awarded each year; and,
Previous winners of the awards.
Documentary evidence describing how the prizes or awards relate to
excellence in the beneficiary’s field.
Documentary evidence of the criteria used to grant the prizes or awards,
including evidence that a criterion for winning the prizes or awards was
excellence in the field.
Note: For any prize or award submitted, please also provide:
A cipy of each prize or award certification; or
A clear photograph of each prize or award; or
Public announcement regarding the awarding of the prizes or awards issued by
the granting organization.
contribution
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. It is noted that the beneficiary has
made significant, novel contributions to the field of science. However,
nearly all research scientists conduct research and publish findings in
scholarly publications and other media. In order for a body of research to
be considered an original contribution of major significance, it must have
influence and/or an impact in the field as demonstrated by objective
evidence. Examples include a vast amount of independent citations by
numerous research articles, evidence that the findings made in the research
has revolutionized the field of endeavor, or other objective evidence to
show the significance of the research findings.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are
original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
（让提供以下证据）
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary
’s contributions of major significance
Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread pubic commentary in the field or has been widely cited
Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution was “original” (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of “major” significance. Genereal statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.
各位大牛有什么建议吗，当时刷号看到前后的好多140都在4月份批了，不知道是pp的还
是non-pp的，所以就pp了，虽然知道背景弱可能会RFE，不过有点急所以pp了。
忘了还有一条，说有非英文的材料，需要提供certified翻译。有中文的引用文章，这
个应该自己翻一下，然后加一张纸说明自己both fluent in english and chinese就可
以吧
我的背景比较弱，claim了award，authorship和contribution。
IO是NSC XM0390，只承认了authorship，其他两样和totality都没有承认。
因为review很少，只有3，所以没有claim这条，现在长到5，还给一个会议review
abstract好多篇，这个算数吗？可以放弃award，claim review吗？
以下是RFE内容：似乎是模板
Award
claim了一个Young Investigator Award(PhD期间得的)；AHA postdoc fellowship；还
有一个会议的research recognition award（其实也是一个postdoc award）。
The evidence of record does not establish that the awards are nationally or
internationally recognized awards for excellence in the field of physiology.
All of these awards were granted during the beneficiary’s doctoral
education or postdoctoral work, essentially when the beneficiary was still
gaining the education and experience required to enter the field of endeavor
. Generally, such honors are not considered to be nationally or
internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of
endeavor, because they are generally given to students or early career
professionals in the field and inherently exclude established professionals
who have already achieved excellence in the field of endeavor. This
criterion has not been met.（这条不符合，都是博士和博士后期间得的奖，不是给
有成就的人的）
To show that they are nationally or internationally recognized prizes or
awards for excellence in the field, the petitioner may submit documentary
evidence demonstrating the following:（让提供以下证据）
The criteria used to grant the prizes or awards;
The significance of the prizes or awards, to include the national or
international recognition that the prizes or awards share;
The reputation of the organization or panel granting the prizes or awards;
Who is considered for the prizes or awards, including the geographic scope
for which candidates may apply;
How many prizes or awards are awarded each year; and,
Previous winners of the awards.
Documentary evidence describing how the prizes or awards relate to
excellence in the beneficiary’s field.
Documentary evidence of the criteria used to grant the prizes or awards,
including evidence that a criterion for winning the prizes or awards was
excellence in the field.
Note: For any prize or award submitted, please also provide:
A cipy of each prize or award certification; or
A clear photograph of each prize or award; or
Public announcement regarding the awarding of the prizes or awards issued by
the granting organization.
contribution
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. It is noted that the beneficiary has
made significant, novel contributions to the field of science. However,
nearly all research scientists conduct research and publish findings in
scholarly publications and other media. In order for a body of research to
be considered an original contribution of major significance, it must have
influence and/or an impact in the field as demonstrated by objective
evidence. Examples include a vast amount of independent citations by
numerous research articles, evidence that the findings made in the research
has revolutionized the field of endeavor, or other objective evidence to
show the significance of the research findings.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are
original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
（让提供以下证据）
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary
’s contributions of major significance
Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread pubic commentary in the field or has been widely cited
Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution was “original” (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of “major” significance. Genereal statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.
各位大牛有什么建议吗，当时刷号看到前后的好多140都在4月份批了，不知道是pp的还
是non-pp的，所以就pp了，虽然知道背景弱可能会RFE，不过有点急所以pp了。
忘了还有一条，说有非英文的材料，需要提供certified翻译。有中文的引用文章，这
个应该自己翻一下，然后加一张纸说明自己both fluent in english and chinese就可
以吧
