更新并求建议！ NSC-RFE (苦等了七个多月，等来了RFE!)# Immigration - 落地生根
b*H
1 楼
昨晚收到律师转来的RFE中的一张, 抄上来恳求大家的意见：
(iv), judge of the work of...: met;
(vi), authorship: met;
但：
(v), Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance is the
field.
the petitioner has provided
a) Letters of recommendation from experts in the field.
this criteria has not been met because the letters submitted do not
sufficiently describe the contributions of major significance to the field.
具体不知道当时律师给怎么给claim的，或许还有b)啥的，引用（50-100之间，估计也
没怎么强调），漂亮的油灯图啥的。。。，不过看起来只是质疑了a)
恳求各位给个建议，应该怎么回复，90天时间已经过了五天了！
本人自提交申请以后情况的更新：
1.一片文章（前实验室的，带名字的，很靠后，紧排在三位老板之前）被faculty1000
evaluated了， “places your work in our library of the top 2% of published
articles in biology and medicine...."， 不知道是否管用？
2. 引用又多了不到20次，
3. 年初得到了promotion， 就是换了个TITLE，长了点工资。
(iv), judge of the work of...: met;
(vi), authorship: met;
但：
(v), Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance is the
field.
the petitioner has provided
a) Letters of recommendation from experts in the field.
this criteria has not been met because the letters submitted do not
sufficiently describe the contributions of major significance to the field.
具体不知道当时律师给怎么给claim的，或许还有b)啥的，引用（50-100之间，估计也
没怎么强调），漂亮的油灯图啥的。。。，不过看起来只是质疑了a)
恳求各位给个建议，应该怎么回复，90天时间已经过了五天了！
本人自提交申请以后情况的更新：
1.一片文章（前实验室的，带名字的，很靠后，紧排在三位老板之前）被faculty1000
evaluated了， “places your work in our library of the top 2% of published
articles in biology and medicine...."， 不知道是否管用？
2. 引用又多了不到20次，
3. 年初得到了promotion， 就是换了个TITLE，长了点工资。
