RFE是不是由审理最初申请的移民官处理。# Immigration - 落地生根
a*r
1 楼
受到contribution 的RFE。 authorship and Review 通过了。 是不是回复RFE的时候
只回答contribution 就可以了。
谢谢大家！
只回答contribution 就可以了。
谢谢大家！
e*r
2 楼
一般都是,除非你是pp,而且开始审你的IO又度假,生病等原因15天内审不了你的案子.
I*r
3 楼
最好把原文贴上来，大家好帮你出主意。
b*e
4 楼
对contribution 的否定就是对整个申请的否定,因此回复的时候就当作重新申请一次来
对待.
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
: 受到contribution 的RFE。 authorship and Review 通过了。 是不是回复RFE的时候
: 只回答contribution 就可以了。
: 谢谢大家！
对待.
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
: 受到contribution 的RFE。 authorship and Review 通过了。 是不是回复RFE的时候
: 只回答contribution 就可以了。
: 谢谢大家！
a*r
5 楼
Here is the contents of the RFE:
Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
petitoner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
significance of the field beyond the institutions who have employed him.
In addition, the record includes several research articles that have cited
the petitioner's collaborative research, showing a moderate citation level,
however it is not apparent that these represent the total number of
citations the petitioner's work has received. The petitioner's own list of
citations is in sufficient as it is not primary evidence such as an online
citation index..
我的Case 的背景是这样的：
Physics PHD, 6 paper, 5 first author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation
) citation according to google scholar.
我该着中那些恢复？
我现在能想到的：两份independent letter, 油灯图， journal rank. 别人多paper
的评价。
很感谢任何建议。
谢谢
Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
petitoner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
significance of the field beyond the institutions who have employed him.
In addition, the record includes several research articles that have cited
the petitioner's collaborative research, showing a moderate citation level,
however it is not apparent that these represent the total number of
citations the petitioner's work has received. The petitioner's own list of
citations is in sufficient as it is not primary evidence such as an online
citation index..
我的Case 的背景是这样的：
Physics PHD, 6 paper, 5 first author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation
) citation according to google scholar.
我该着中那些恢复？
我现在能想到的：两份independent letter, 油灯图， journal rank. 别人多paper
的评价。
很感谢任何建议。
谢谢
相关阅读
【求助】485改地址向editor要推荐信模板NSC DIY EB1A RFE 求助！！移民局如何决定case是送到TSC还是NSC处理?申请公民过程中，怎样换地方按指纹？conference abstract opportunity for people in ECONOMICS MANAGEMENT/STRATEGY/ORGANISATION PSYCHOLOGYNSC EB1A PP 第六天了律师用citation来证明媒体报道，靠谱不紧急问题求教－关于申请140期间回国攒人品， 转review机会review opportunity (referred)EAD可以办加急吗？弱问，EAD事宜。一家人的receipt number是挨着的吗 (转载)NSC看来新财年该放水了。。nonpp 如果四个月之后没有批，用那个e-request管用吗？请教：作为一个期刊的编辑邀稿另外一个杂志的编辑求教OPT extension关于I-20表的问题请问交党费和485的问题TSC EB1B 140 non-PP approved on 10/02