DIY EB1a PP NSC Request for Evidence, Help!# Immigration - 落地生根
f*g
1 楼
background:
Physics
20 journal publications and 5 conference proceedings (11 first authored)
1 patent
total citations: google scholar 360+, ISI 300+
Reviews: 14times, 2 for APL, 3 for PRL
claim 老三样：authorship, contributions and review
RFE:
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, as a judge of the work of
others
this criterion has been met by the petitioner's submission of evidence
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic..
..contributions of major significance in the field.
the petitioner has provided opinion letters by experts in the beneficiary's
field, evidence of the beneficiary's patent application, and evidence
establishing moderate citation of the beneficiary's work. However, the
criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show the
beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major significance in
the field of endeavor. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contributions satisfy this criterion, the petioner may submit:
.objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
.additional testimony and or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
.evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
licenced technology being used by others;
patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field
Note:.....
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles in the
field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media
this criterion has been met by the petitioner's submission of evidence that
the beneficiary authored scholarly article published in academic journals in
the field.
然后是结论，提到两步法的判决。
Physics
20 journal publications and 5 conference proceedings (11 first authored)
1 patent
total citations: google scholar 360+, ISI 300+
Reviews: 14times, 2 for APL, 3 for PRL
claim 老三样：authorship, contributions and review
RFE:
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, as a judge of the work of
others
this criterion has been met by the petitioner's submission of evidence
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic..
..contributions of major significance in the field.
the petitioner has provided opinion letters by experts in the beneficiary's
field, evidence of the beneficiary's patent application, and evidence
establishing moderate citation of the beneficiary's work. However, the
criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show the
beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major significance in
the field of endeavor. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contributions satisfy this criterion, the petioner may submit:
.objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
.additional testimony and or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
.evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
licenced technology being used by others;
patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field
Note:.....
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles in the
field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media
this criterion has been met by the petitioner's submission of evidence that
the beneficiary authored scholarly article published in academic journals in
the field.
然后是结论，提到两步法的判决。
