RFE再请教，我把问题都敲出来了。# Immigration - 落地生根
D*Y
1 楼
i ) The reference letters submitted all speak highly of the beneficiary;
however, make no reference to how the beneficiary’s work had already had a
wide impact on the field as a whole. The writers offer no detail about the
geographic scope of the impact of the beneficiary’s work, including numbers
of individuals or institutions who have implemented his research findings
and their specific locations. The letters offer no details of how processes
or procedures have changed at other research centers nationally or how
companies across the nation have adopted the beneficiary’s contributions
into their products.
－－这段都是讲recommendation letter的样子，本来想上油灯图，不知道是不是合适
。我打算要俩原来的references再写一letter，再向一editor要一letter，不知道够了
没。
ii ) The evidence offers no detail about the extent of this claimed
recognition, such as by naming specific individuals and institutions whose
work the beneficiary has influenced, or how, exactly, the beneficiary has
played a significant role in the work of others on at least a national scale.
－－感觉这段和第一段一模一样啊。该怎么区分对待呢？该上什么evidence呢？
iii) Publication of one’s findings is inherent to all researchers. The mere
publication of scholarly articles or research findings does not demonstrate
national or international acclaim. Moreover, the beneficiary’s authorship/
co-authorship of published articles may demonstrate that your research
efforts yielded some useful and valid results. However, it is apparent that
any article, in order to be accepted in a scientific journal for publication
, must offer new and useful information to the pool of knowledge. It does
not follow that every scientist whose scholarly research is accepted for
publication has made a major contribution to his field. The record does not
establish that the beneficiary’s published articles have garnered the
attention of other professional throughout the field such that his
publications can be deemed consistent with national or international
recognition.
－－这个要强调什么呢？我发现的重要性？citations？
iv ) Although you have eleven authored/co-authored papers, some of which
were published in highly rated journals, publishing a paper is limited to
acclaimed authors. When viewed in conjunction with other researchers, your
publication record, with 140 citations at the time of filing, does not
demonstrate that your work has achieved a level of recognition that would
classify you as one of the small percentage who are at the very top of the
field, and that you have made contributions of major significance in the
field.
－这个打算上citation comparison和facult productivity comparison。
请指教。
however, make no reference to how the beneficiary’s work had already had a
wide impact on the field as a whole. The writers offer no detail about the
geographic scope of the impact of the beneficiary’s work, including numbers
of individuals or institutions who have implemented his research findings
and their specific locations. The letters offer no details of how processes
or procedures have changed at other research centers nationally or how
companies across the nation have adopted the beneficiary’s contributions
into their products.
－－这段都是讲recommendation letter的样子，本来想上油灯图，不知道是不是合适
。我打算要俩原来的references再写一letter，再向一editor要一letter，不知道够了
没。
ii ) The evidence offers no detail about the extent of this claimed
recognition, such as by naming specific individuals and institutions whose
work the beneficiary has influenced, or how, exactly, the beneficiary has
played a significant role in the work of others on at least a national scale.
－－感觉这段和第一段一模一样啊。该怎么区分对待呢？该上什么evidence呢？
iii) Publication of one’s findings is inherent to all researchers. The mere
publication of scholarly articles or research findings does not demonstrate
national or international acclaim. Moreover, the beneficiary’s authorship/
co-authorship of published articles may demonstrate that your research
efforts yielded some useful and valid results. However, it is apparent that
any article, in order to be accepted in a scientific journal for publication
, must offer new and useful information to the pool of knowledge. It does
not follow that every scientist whose scholarly research is accepted for
publication has made a major contribution to his field. The record does not
establish that the beneficiary’s published articles have garnered the
attention of other professional throughout the field such that his
publications can be deemed consistent with national or international
recognition.
－－这个要强调什么呢？我发现的重要性？citations？
iv ) Although you have eleven authored/co-authored papers, some of which
were published in highly rated journals, publishing a paper is limited to
acclaimed authors. When viewed in conjunction with other researchers, your
publication record, with 140 citations at the time of filing, does not
demonstrate that your work has achieved a level of recognition that would
classify you as one of the small percentage who are at the very top of the
field, and that you have made contributions of major significance in the
field.
－这个打算上citation comparison和facult productivity comparison。
请指教。
