[合集] 我也把我的RFE贴出来，请大牛们多多指教# Immigration - 落地生根
k*e
1 楼
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fangyi (没有昵称) 于 (Thu Aug 16 20:24:39 2012, 美东) 提到:
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted, while
impressive, does not show that the beneficiary's contributions are
considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. To assist
in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are original and of
of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
最后一条，我的工作被应用我肯定没有。律师就是强调做一个citation analysis，另
外要editor's letter，我想补推荐信，律师说如果不能证明我的研究被推荐人在自己
的工作中广泛应用，否则意义不大，大家看看还有救吗，望大家执教
基本情况
EB1A, NSC, 追加PP后被RFE，承认了publication and judge,不承认contribution
Field：Polymer science
Publication: 15 journal +3 conference 9 first author journal, IF:1-6
Review: 35 for 6 journals, now 40 for 8 journals, IF: 1-6，但是影响因子低的
杂志占绝大多数
Citation: 141, now 163 (121 independent)
Two small fundings, 1 most cited paper
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
yccycc (zip) 于 (Thu Aug 16 20:33:50 2012, 美东) 提到:
LZ搞了几封推荐信啊
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
SandR (长耳朵) 于 (Thu Aug 16 21:01:46 2012, 美东) 提到:
找引过你paper的教授给你出推荐信
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fangyi (没有昵称) 于 (Thu Aug 16 21:45:05 2012, 美东) 提到:
不好找了，有关系的基本都找过了，剩下的都是完全没有关系的了
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
dongding (茶韵) 于 (Fri Aug 17 12:29:19 2012, 美东) 提到:
My 2 cents, list all your contributions in order, like 1, 2, 3... List the
long citations of your work, e.g. the review papers. Using your journal rank
to prove how good your work is. The cooperation institution can prove how
widespread your work is. Using the conference (rank, how many people/country
attend) to prove the influence.
Add more letters if you could, esp those who don't have any relation with
you, state they don't know you but your work is impressive. Using "
significant", "pioneer", "leading-edge" words in the letters, and spread the
references, like from Europe, Asia, US, etc. Listing the countries/
institutes that cite your work, find out the big names that cite your work/
use your method or data. Use funding to prove your work is pioneer.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fangyi (没有昵称) 于 (Fri Aug 17 13:13:36 2012, 美东) 提到:
谢谢楼上的意见，在找推荐信，怎么能证明我的工作对推荐人的影响啊
fangyi (没有昵称) 于 (Thu Aug 16 20:24:39 2012, 美东) 提到:
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted, while
impressive, does not show that the beneficiary's contributions are
considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. To assist
in determining whether the beneficiary's contributions are original and of
of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
最后一条，我的工作被应用我肯定没有。律师就是强调做一个citation analysis，另
外要editor's letter，我想补推荐信，律师说如果不能证明我的研究被推荐人在自己
的工作中广泛应用，否则意义不大，大家看看还有救吗，望大家执教
基本情况
EB1A, NSC, 追加PP后被RFE，承认了publication and judge,不承认contribution
Field：Polymer science
Publication: 15 journal +3 conference 9 first author journal, IF:1-6
Review: 35 for 6 journals, now 40 for 8 journals, IF: 1-6，但是影响因子低的
杂志占绝大多数
Citation: 141, now 163 (121 independent)
Two small fundings, 1 most cited paper
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
yccycc (zip) 于 (Thu Aug 16 20:33:50 2012, 美东) 提到:
LZ搞了几封推荐信啊
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
SandR (长耳朵) 于 (Thu Aug 16 21:01:46 2012, 美东) 提到:
找引过你paper的教授给你出推荐信
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fangyi (没有昵称) 于 (Thu Aug 16 21:45:05 2012, 美东) 提到:
不好找了，有关系的基本都找过了，剩下的都是完全没有关系的了
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
dongding (茶韵) 于 (Fri Aug 17 12:29:19 2012, 美东) 提到:
My 2 cents, list all your contributions in order, like 1, 2, 3... List the
long citations of your work, e.g. the review papers. Using your journal rank
to prove how good your work is. The cooperation institution can prove how
widespread your work is. Using the conference (rank, how many people/country
attend) to prove the influence.
Add more letters if you could, esp those who don't have any relation with
you, state they don't know you but your work is impressive. Using "
significant", "pioneer", "leading-edge" words in the letters, and spread the
references, like from Europe, Asia, US, etc. Listing the countries/
institutes that cite your work, find out the big names that cite your work/
use your method or data. Use funding to prove your work is pioneer.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fangyi (没有昵称) 于 (Fri Aug 17 13:13:36 2012, 美东) 提到:
谢谢楼上的意见，在找推荐信，怎么能证明我的工作对推荐人的影响啊