eb1b 3条过符合另外2条要求RFE 帮帮偶吧！！跪求啊 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Immigration - 落地生根

eb1b 3条过符合另外2条要求RFE 帮帮偶吧！！跪求啊

eb1b 3条过符合另外2条要求RFE 帮帮偶吧！！跪求啊# Immigration - 落地生根

z*n2011-10-07 07:10

1 楼

背景top phd 学校
top 公司
但是从事领域不一样
eb1b
claim 了5条
当初还专门问律师需要不需要少claim 一些
结果律师说as many as possible
结果claim 了5条 3条符合剩下2条需要RFE
但是我材料基本已经挖空心思了了请问偶是需要换个律师从新办一次
还是继续RFE？？？？

x*w2011-10-07 07:10

2 楼

没关系的，找几封推荐信，补点材料，过得可能性很大。律师怎么说？
不说详细点，比如具体哪几条过了，ＲＦＥ的什么内容。不然大家没法帮你！

T*y2011-10-07 07:10

3 楼

EB1B requires only two claims to be passed. Your lawyer's approach seems to
be inviting problems.
But I bet that the two claims that have not been passed include contribution
, right? That's almost equal to totality, and that's the ultimate criteria
that you have to pass.
You don't have to claim all of them again, but just focus on the strongest
two or three items, and try to support the contribution as much as possible.
The RFE package should look like a whole new package.
Your lawyer could be still used if he agrees with you, or else you could try
a new lawyer, but it's going to be costly.

【在 z***n 的大作中提到】

: 背景top phd 学校
: top 公司
: 但是从事领域不一样
: eb1b
: claim 了5条
: 当初还专门问律师需要不需要少claim 一些
: 结果律师说as many as possible
: 结果claim 了5条 3条符合剩下2条需要RFE
: 但是我材料基本已经挖空心思了了请问偶是需要换个律师从新办一次
: 还是继续RFE？？？？

l*02011-10-07 07:10

4 楼

IO真BT啊
我不知道这种情况能不能直接回信给IO,老子已经满足超过两条了,剩下两条放弃了,快
给老子批了?

z*n2011-10-07 07:10

5 楼

谢谢大家，通过的是
1.participation ... as judge of work of others
2.authorship of scholarly articles in the filed in the field... or other major media
3.leading role for organizations
没通过 original scientific, scholarly, artistic.....related contribution of major significance in field
没通过 publication material about ...
rfe 的大意是推荐信和自我陈述写的contribution 都非常broad，不具体。都写了l类似"对业界做巨大贡献"之类的话，虽然推荐人都比较牛。
说贡献都是对直接的雇主有benefit 而不是这个field，什么推荐信中的
”造福了无数工程师“ 这种话。但是没说什么东西造福了哪个工程师怎么被认可的。
phd 期间领域很理论很窄所以paper 少 citation 也很少
虽然论文领域内影响是很大的期刊。
怎么办呢？？？？

T*y2011-10-07 07:10

6 楼

What do you mean by the above?
Contribution is the one that you need to pass, by using everything else to
support it.
As to that contribution comment that it should be for the field, rather than
only for your company, you can get more letters from other places to say so
.

【在 z***n 的大作中提到】

: 谢谢大家，通过的是
: 1.participation ... as judge of work of others
: 2.authorship of scholarly articles in the filed in the field... or other major media
: 3.leading role for organizations
: 没通过 original scientific, scholarly, artistic.....related contribution of major significance in field
: 没通过 publication material about ...
: rfe 的大意是推荐信和自我陈述写的contribution 都非常broad，不具体。都写了l类似"对业界做巨大贡献"之类的话，虽然推荐人都比较牛。
: 说贡献都是对直接的雇主有benefit 而不是这个field，什么推荐信中的
: ”造福了无数工程师“ 这种话。但是没说什么东西造福了哪个工程师怎么被认可的。
: phd 期间领域很理论很窄所以paper 少 citation 也很少

e*r2011-10-07 07:10

7 楼

哈哈哈说的好啊。有气势
我觉得应该你再找两封推荐信，具体吹吹你的贡献，就能过了

【在 l********0 的大作中提到】

: IO真BT啊
: 我不知道这种情况能不能直接回信给IO,老子已经满足超过两条了,剩下两条放弃了,快
: 给老子批了?

c*g2011-10-07 07:10

8 楼

eb1b居然claim了5条啊？
这说明楼主你的条件很好。
我觉得好好重新组织一下，不过没有天理了。
把别的东西都用来支持一向contribution

【在 z***n 的大作中提到】

y*u2011-10-07 07:10

9 楼

Maybe you should pay more attention to totality. In such case, if the IO
want deny your application, the only reason would be that you did not show your
extraordinary ability.

f*g2011-10-07 07:10

10 楼

eb1b也要totality？？

your

【在 y***u 的大作中提到】

: Maybe you should pay more attention to totality. In such case, if the IO
: want deny your application, the only reason would be that you did not show your
: extraordinary ability.

y*u2011-10-07 07:10

11 楼

I think so. Such cases was posted in the past.

【在 f*****g 的大作中提到】

: eb1b也要totality？？
:
: your

E*H2011-10-07 07:10

12 楼

Bless

谢谢大家，通过的是
1.participation ... as judge of work of others
2.authorship of scholarly articles in the filed in the field... or other
major media
3.leading role for organizations
没通过 original scientific, scholarly, artistic.....related contribution of
major significance in field
没通过 publication material about ...
rfe 的大意是推荐信和自我陈述写的contribution 都非常broad，不具体。都写了l类
似"对业界做巨大贡献"之类的话，虽然推荐人都比较牛。
说贡献都是对直接的雇主有benefit 而不是这个field，什么推荐信中的
”造福了无数工程师“ 这种话。但是没说什么东西造福了哪个工程师怎么被认可的。
phd 期间领域很理论很窄所以paper 少 citation 也很少
虽然论文领域内影响是很大的期刊。
怎么办呢？？？？

【在 z***n 的大作中提到】