谁知道EB1b petition letter 中 "Burden of Proof is only “PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE"" 是什么意思？# Immigration - 落地生根
d*u
1 楼
比IPAD强
f*a
2 楼
fuwu从国内空降google， fuwu 2013 年自己拿到绿卡后由于没有美国学历而极度自卑,
遂告发eb2->eb3降级导致eb3排期后退３年，此事eb23人人皆知。
遂告发eb2->eb3降级导致eb3排期后退３年，此事eb23人人皆知。
w*n
3 楼
我的律师在petition letter 中着重说这个是 Burden of Proof is only “
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE。
是个法律名词， 上网查查， 就是说＂提供的证据是很倾向于着个case是真的＂， 而
且是＂证据不在多而是更能说明问题＂， 看得我很雾水。 主要是以前没有听说谁的信
有这些语言。 别弄巧成拙就更郁闷了， 请懂的同学来讲讲， 虚心求教。
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE。
是个法律名词， 上网查查， 就是说＂提供的证据是很倾向于着个case是真的＂， 而
且是＂证据不在多而是更能说明问题＂， 看得我很雾水。 主要是以前没有听说谁的信
有这些语言。 别弄巧成拙就更郁闷了， 请懂的同学来讲讲， 虚心求教。
w*r
4 楼
这个家伙最后去哪里了，应该曝光真名，以后老中见到应该直接就给锯掉
还是我原来老板好，只要中国人，很帮忙的
还是我原来老板好，只要中国人，很帮忙的
G*6
5 楼
反正是律师写 您就甭操这个心啦
f*a
6 楼
google!
网上有他的人肉资料
【在 w****r 的大作中提到】
: 这个家伙最后去哪里了，应该曝光真名，以后老中见到应该直接就给锯掉
: 还是我原来老板好，只要中国人，很帮忙的
网上有他的人肉资料
【在 w****r 的大作中提到】
: 这个家伙最后去哪里了，应该曝光真名，以后老中见到应该直接就给锯掉
: 还是我原来老板好，只要中国人，很帮忙的
w*n
7 楼
呵呵， 还是挺操心， 律师在信里连名字都是错的， 弄得我更觉得他做事的态度。
另外， 我是很好奇这个term， 从来没有听说谁提到过。
【在 G***6 的大作中提到】
: 反正是律师写 您就甭操这个心啦
另外， 我是很好奇这个term， 从来没有听说谁提到过。
【在 G***6 的大作中提到】
: 反正是律师写 您就甭操这个心啦
s*e
8 楼
看来这种人还真不少，国内培养出来的“精英”还真不是我们可比的
卑,
【在 f*****a 的大作中提到】
: fuwu从国内空降google， fuwu 2013 年自己拿到绿卡后由于没有美国学历而极度自卑,
: 遂告发eb2->eb3降级导致eb3排期后退３年，此事eb23人人皆知。
卑,
【在 f*****a 的大作中提到】
: fuwu从国内空降google， fuwu 2013 年自己拿到绿卡后由于没有美国学历而极度自卑,
: 遂告发eb2->eb3降级导致eb3排期后退３年，此事eb23人人皆知。
w*t
9 楼
it means the level of burden is not as high as "beyond the reasonable doubt.
" Beyond the reasonable doubt standard is for criminal cases mainly.
" Beyond the reasonable doubt standard is for criminal cases mainly.
w*r
10 楼
google不到，要打什么关键词啊
【在 f*****a 的大作中提到】
: google!
: 网上有他的人肉资料
【在 f*****a 的大作中提到】
: google!
: 网上有他的人肉资料
w*n
11 楼
是的， 我在网上也看到这个。
是说， 他这么写是正常的格式话语言吧 (in the petition letter)？ 我以前在别人
的sample letter 从来没有看到过， 所以很好奇。
doubt.
【在 w*****t 的大作中提到】
: it means the level of burden is not as high as "beyond the reasonable doubt.
: " Beyond the reasonable doubt standard is for criminal cases mainly.
是说， 他这么写是正常的格式话语言吧 (in the petition letter)？ 我以前在别人
的sample letter 从来没有看到过， 所以很好奇。
doubt.
【在 w*****t 的大作中提到】
: it means the level of burden is not as high as "beyond the reasonable doubt.
: " Beyond the reasonable doubt standard is for criminal cases mainly.
e*0
12 楼
在绿卡版有置顶的帖子
已被人肉出来
【在 w****r 的大作中提到】
: google不到，要打什么关键词啊
已被人肉出来
【在 w****r 的大作中提到】
: google不到，要打什么关键词啊
o*u
13 楼
下面是从版上一个系列文章中抄的,想不起来id了,不好意思.
According to the guidance provided in the Adjudicator’s Field Manual, in
reaching the preponderance of the evidence threshold, COMPANY is not
required to prove beyond any doubt that Dr. XXX is internationally
recognized as outstanding in her academic area. Instead, the Adjudicator’s
Field Manual is explicit:
The standard of proof applied in most administrative immigration proceedings
is the “preponderance of the evidence” standard. Thus, even if the
director has some doubt as to the truth, if the petitioner submits relevant,
probative, and credible evidence that leads the director to believe that
the claim is “probably true” or “more likely than not,” the applicant or
petitioner has satisfied the standard of proof. See U.S. v. Cardozo-Fonseca
, 480 U.S. 421 (1987) (defining “more likely than not” as a greater than
50 percent probability of something occurring). If the director can
articulate a material doubt, it is appropriate for the director to either
request additional evidence or, if that doubt leads the director to believe
that the claim is probably not true, deny the application or petition.
Exhibit XXX (Adjudicator’s Field Manual § 11.1(c)).
Consequently, COMPANY is not required to dispel all doubt concerning the
level of Dr. XXX’s recognition. COMPANY is required to show that it is “
more likely than not” that Dr. XXX is recognized internationally as
outstanding in her academic field. This, the company has done.
According to the guidance provided in the Adjudicator’s Field Manual, in
reaching the preponderance of the evidence threshold, COMPANY is not
required to prove beyond any doubt that Dr. XXX is internationally
recognized as outstanding in her academic area. Instead, the Adjudicator’s
Field Manual is explicit:
The standard of proof applied in most administrative immigration proceedings
is the “preponderance of the evidence” standard. Thus, even if the
director has some doubt as to the truth, if the petitioner submits relevant,
probative, and credible evidence that leads the director to believe that
the claim is “probably true” or “more likely than not,” the applicant or
petitioner has satisfied the standard of proof. See U.S. v. Cardozo-Fonseca
, 480 U.S. 421 (1987) (defining “more likely than not” as a greater than
50 percent probability of something occurring). If the director can
articulate a material doubt, it is appropriate for the director to either
request additional evidence or, if that doubt leads the director to believe
that the claim is probably not true, deny the application or petition.
Exhibit XXX (Adjudicator’s Field Manual § 11.1(c)).
Consequently, COMPANY is not required to dispel all doubt concerning the
level of Dr. XXX’s recognition. COMPANY is required to show that it is “
more likely than not” that Dr. XXX is recognized internationally as
outstanding in her academic field. This, the company has done.
w*n
14 楼
多谢！
觉得美国人做事情真的是一套一套的。呵呵
’s
proceedings
relevant,
【在 o*******u 的大作中提到】
: 下面是从版上一个系列文章中抄的,想不起来id了,不好意思.
: According to the guidance provided in the Adjudicator’s Field Manual, in
: reaching the preponderance of the evidence threshold, COMPANY is not
: required to prove beyond any doubt that Dr. XXX is internationally
: recognized as outstanding in her academic area. Instead, the Adjudicator’s
: Field Manual is explicit:
: The standard of proof applied in most administrative immigration proceedings
: is the “preponderance of the evidence” standard. Thus, even if the
: director has some doubt as to the truth, if the petitioner submits relevant,
: probative, and credible evidence that leads the director to believe that
觉得美国人做事情真的是一套一套的。呵呵
’s
proceedings
relevant,
【在 o*******u 的大作中提到】
: 下面是从版上一个系列文章中抄的,想不起来id了,不好意思.
: According to the guidance provided in the Adjudicator’s Field Manual, in
: reaching the preponderance of the evidence threshold, COMPANY is not
: required to prove beyond any doubt that Dr. XXX is internationally
: recognized as outstanding in her academic area. Instead, the Adjudicator’s
: Field Manual is explicit:
: The standard of proof applied in most administrative immigration proceedings
: is the “preponderance of the evidence” standard. Thus, even if the
: director has some doubt as to the truth, if the petitioner submits relevant,
: probative, and credible evidence that leads the director to believe that
相关阅读
推荐人的CVeb1a PP NSC 求 bless弱case申請NIW，想請推薦移民律師4/29/16 RD NSC 485 求bless帮忙说说期刊的介绍大家是打印的网页还是截屏？谢谢大家google scholar citations 减少审稿机会-JPOC咨询--出生公证-有关。国内的地址变了可以同时公司sponsor和自己搞EB1a吗EB1B approved?公司给找的485律师一直没进展怎么办485 EAD 卡从状态显示 CARD IS BEING PRODUCED到实际收到，一般需要多久？求REVIEW，包子谢 ：Drug delivery, anticancer, polymerAMO方向求审稿机会请问N-400表上不在美国的日期如何计算？fresh PhD能办Eb1a吗？很一般的publication，被人说能办。。。I-140通过之后J-1可以延期出生证明要求地址XM0405 RFE求助 网站主流媒体 和 contribution is major siginificance