Redian新闻
>
分享DIY的Exhibition List,并且大家提提改进意见
avatar
分享DIY的Exhibition List,并且大家提提改进意见# Immigration - 落地生根
f*e
1
看了版上很多cases之后,自己DIY了EB1a,即将提交。现将Exhibition List分享,自
我感觉这个list还是比较全面的,很多需要注意的点都列入并且提供证明材料了,希望
对大家有所帮助!
目前还没有提交,因此也请诸位提提意见,看有没有什么错误或遗漏!
谢谢啦!
*************************
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Recommendation Letters and Testimony Letters
Exhibit 1, Pages xx-yy: Independent Recommendation Letter from xx
Highlight: “xx”
Exhibit 2: Independent Recommendation Letter from Dr. x
Highlight: “xx”
Exhibit 3: Independent Recommendation Letter from xx
Highlight: “xx”
Exhibit 4: Recommendation Letter from x
Highlight: “xx”
Exhibit 5: Independent Recommendation Letter from xx
Highlight:xx
Exhibit 6: Independent Recommendation Letter from xx
Highlight:xx
Exhibit 7: Independent Recommendation Letter from Dr. xx .S.
Highlight xx
Exhibit 8: Independent Recommendation Letter xxxx
Highlight:xx
Exhibit 9: Testimony Letter from Editor-in-Chief of xx
Exhibit 10: Testimony Letter from Editor of Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Exhibit 11: An example of a Dedicated Research Highlight to my paper.
“xx
Exhibit B: Evidences of Authorship of Scholarly Articles
Exhibit 10 (Page xx): A list of my xx publications.
Exhibit 11 (Page xx): Copy of the first pages of my xx papers.
Exhibit 12: Introduction to SCImago Journal & Country Ranking (SJR journal
ranking).
Exhibit 13: SJR journal ranking information, evidencing that my xx papers
have been published in leading & TOP ranked journals (Top 0.1%, Top 0.2%).
Exhibit 14: The introduction and significance of the journals that published
my work.
Exhibit 15: Reviewers’ comments to my papers are very positive.
Exhibit 16: The total independent citations (>xx times) of my xx papers
according to ISI Web of Knowledge
Exhibit 17: Evidence of the scientists who have been citing my papers are
distributed in North America, Asia, Europe, South America, and Africa
Exhibit C: Evidence of Original Contribution of Major Significance
Exhibit 18: Evidence of independent citations (>xx times) of my papers and
the scientists who have been citing my papers are distributed from >xx
countries worldwide.
Exhibit 19: Evidence of the dedicated Research Highlight to my xx paper
published in xx. by Prof. xx
Exhibit 20: The introduction to xx and xx. and SJR journal ranking of xx and
xx. (No 1 and No 2 among 563 journals).
Exhibit 21: An introduction to Prof. xx who wrote this dedicated Research
Highlight.
Exhibit 22: Evidence of the dedicated Research Highlight to my xx paper
published in xx.
Exhibit 23: The introduction to xx and xxy and SJR journal ranking of these
two journals (top 0.2%).
Exhibit 24: My papers have been cited by TOP research institutions (Harvard
Univ., MIT, Oxford Univ., Cambridge Univ., etc)
Exhibit 25: My papers have been cited by TOP journals, including Science and
Nature.
Exhibit 26: My papers have been cited by TOP scientists, including Nobel
Laureate, member of National Academic of Sciences.
Exhibit 27: My papers have been cited frequently by Review Articles and
Books.
Exhibit 28: Evidences of my methods have been heavily discussed and widely
used by others.
Exhibit 29: Evidences of research news and highlight to my other papers (
Internano, Nature, Nautre Asian, Nanowerk).
Exhibit 30: Evidences of Top Percentage: Page x. My x paper ranks No 1 among
Top 25 most-downloaded articles during June 2009- July 2009
Exhibit 31: Evidences of Top Percentage: Multiple of my papers are among Top
0.5% to Top 1.9% cited in the field.
Exhibit D: Evidences of judging other scientists’ work as Reviewer and
Adjudicative Expert Reviewer for International Journals
Exhibit 32: A summary of papers and journals I have reviewed (xx journals,
xx papers)
Exhibit 33: Evidence of my reviewer work for x (Top 0.5%).
Exhibit 34: Evidence of my reviewer work for x(Top 1.6%).
Exhibit 35: Evidence of my reviewer work for x (Top 0.5%).
Exhibit 36: Evidence of my reviewer work for x (Top 2.3%).
Exhibit 37: Evidence of my reviewer work for x (Top 0.5%).
Exhibit 38: Evidence of my reviewer work for x (Top 1.6%).
Exhibit 39: Evidence of my reviewer work for x.
Exhibit 40: Evidence of my reviewer work for x.
Exhibit 41: Evidence of my reviewer work for x.
Exhibit 42: Evidence of my reviewer work for x.
Exhibit 43: Evidence of my reviewer work for x.
Exhibit 44: Evidence of my reviewer work for x (Top 1.4%).
Exhibit 45: SJR journal ranking information of the journals I have reviewed.
Exhibit 46: Some examples of Editors’ Thank You Letters, evidencing my
expert peer-review work for these journals.
Exhibit 47: Some examples of Editors’ Invitation Letters.
Exhibit 48: Some examples of Editors’ Invitation Letters to show that I was
invited to review the papers because I am an expert in the field.
Exhibit 49: Examples of Editors’ Invitation Letters to invite me to serve
as Adjudicative Reviewer for the second-round judgment, as they have
received conflicting recommendations.
Exhibit 50: Examples of Editors’ Support Letters to show the criterion of
choosing the reviewers are very rigorous.
Exhibit E: My Background Information and Lawful Documents
Exhibit 51, (Page xx): My curriculum Vitae
Exhibit 52 (Page xx): Copy of my Ph.D diploma
Exhibit 53: Photocopy of my Postdoc offer letter from xx
Exhibit 54: University ranking information of xx
Exhibit 55: Copy of my paychecks of last three months
Exhibit 56: Photocopy of my passport
Exhibit 57: Photocopy of my current visa
Exhibit 58: Photocopy of my form I-94
Exhibit 59: Photocopies of all DS-2019 forms
Exhibit 60: Photocopy of my social security card
avatar
c*3
2
zan
avatar
y*9
3
非常棒。看得出楼主很牛
请问evidence 30 和evidence 31楼主是怎么准备的?
avatar
f*e
4
evidence 30可以从杂志主页上找到信息
evidence 31你就是在Web of science里面换关键词搜索,然后找个自己排名第一的。
然后把杂志主页和wos页面打印

【在 y**********9 的大作中提到】
: 非常棒。看得出楼主很牛
: 请问evidence 30 和evidence 31楼主是怎么准备的?

avatar
x*o
5
mark.
thanks
avatar
n*0
6
可以看出楼主准备的很细致,很全面。不过我有两点想法,供你参考。
1. 你的Exhibit B, C, D,分别从authorship, contribution and judge others' work
(老三样),那么你的推荐信单独列出来是属于其中的那一个呢?通常推荐信是来证明
你的contribution的。我个人觉得可以把A和C整合,即exhibit A。放在第一个位置。
从你的list可以看出来你的引用和文章档次应该非常好。RFE往往就质疑contribution
。你把这放在第一位,一下子就抓住了IO的眼球。
2. 我觉得你还要再一个Exhibit,就是证明你会在你的研究领域继续贡献你的杰出能
力的evidence。这一样也是容易忽略的。我看了你给了postdoc offer letter。最好还
是能够单独列出来,让IO一步了然。当时我是开了employment verfication letter.
纯属个人愚见。
avatar
b*z
7
Very Good.

【在 f******e 的大作中提到】
: 看了版上很多cases之后,自己DIY了EB1a,即将提交。现将Exhibition List分享,自
: 我感觉这个list还是比较全面的,很多需要注意的点都列入并且提供证明材料了,希望
: 对大家有所帮助!
: 目前还没有提交,因此也请诸位提提意见,看有没有什么错误或遗漏!
: 谢谢啦!
: *************************
: INDEX OF EXHIBITS
: Exhibit A: Recommendation Letters and Testimony Letters
: Exhibit 1, Pages xx-yy: Independent Recommendation Letter from xx
: Highlight: “xx”

avatar
w*o
8
赞!
avatar
f*e
9
Thanks!~

work
contribution

【在 n*****0 的大作中提到】
: 可以看出楼主准备的很细致,很全面。不过我有两点想法,供你参考。
: 1. 你的Exhibit B, C, D,分别从authorship, contribution and judge others' work
: (老三样),那么你的推荐信单独列出来是属于其中的那一个呢?通常推荐信是来证明
: 你的contribution的。我个人觉得可以把A和C整合,即exhibit A。放在第一个位置。
: 从你的list可以看出来你的引用和文章档次应该非常好。RFE往往就质疑contribution
: 。你把这放在第一位,一下子就抓住了IO的眼球。
: 2. 我觉得你还要再一个Exhibit,就是证明你会在你的研究领域继续贡献你的杰出能
: 力的evidence。这一样也是容易忽略的。我看了你给了postdoc offer letter。最好还
: 是能够单独列出来,让IO一步了然。当时我是开了employment verfication letter.
: 纯属个人愚见。

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。