收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感 谢
j*e
2 楼
先研究大蜜俱乐部的文章啊
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】 : 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major : significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感 : 谢
W*o
3 楼
怎么证明major啊?
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】 : 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major : significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感 : 谢
a*l
4 楼
baackground什么都没有,叫大家怎么出主意...
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】 : 收到 TSC 杀手0100的RFE. 承认 "original contribution" but not " major : significant contribution". 请教大蜜还有本版的高人指点应该如何回复....非常感 : 谢
p*6
5 楼
不好意思,着急忘说了 7 paper 80 citation 14 reviewer 很弱! :( In the RFE letter the officer stated: 1 the evidence falls short in establishing your works is considered a major significant contribution. 2 Your citation record does not establish your work has made a major significant impact with your field. It has not been established your works has been heavily cited or widely implemented. 请指教!
h*e
6 楼
这是a还是b啊
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】 : 不好意思,着急忘说了 : 7 paper : 80 citation : 14 reviewer : 很弱! :( : In the RFE letter the officer stated: : 1 the evidence falls short in establishing your works is considered a major : significant contribution. : 2 Your citation record does not establish your work has made a major : significant impact with your field. It has not been established your works
p*6
7 楼
是a
P*1
8 楼
看起来是比平均少了点。是不是太急了点? 我从NIW到Eb1a等了快三年了。就是因为引用和review文章太少了。 你现在估计也只能硬着头皮,发掘一下看有没有更多亮点了。 Good luck!
major
【在 p********6 的大作中提到】 : 不好意思,着急忘说了 : 7 paper : 80 citation : 14 reviewer : 很弱! :( : In the RFE letter the officer stated: : 1 the evidence falls short in establishing your works is considered a major : significant contribution. : 2 Your citation record does not establish your work has made a major : significant impact with your field. It has not been established your works