Redian新闻
>
我提供的证据律师基本不认
avatar
我提供的证据律师基本不认# Immigration - 落地生根
z*i
1
google scholar的引用,然后用ISI的citation percentile,他不认.
If we are to use specific data about citations to show comparisons, we need
to use appropriate data. I know that ISI data on citations is different (
typically lower) than what you get in Googlescholar. If we are to compare
your citations to the field, we need to use consistent data. Feel free to
show me ISI data on your citations and I may incorporate that along with
adding the ISI baseline documentation.
我发表5片paper在同一个杂志(专业内journal rank排名第一),他不认.
As journal rank, etc. I do not consider this as useful. It is likely that if
your case is challenged it will be because the immigration officer thinks
an EB1A person should have more citations. However, if we get an immigration
officer not satisfied with citations of your work, no downloads, etc, will
make him/her think otherwise.
我某个book chapter被300图书馆收藏,他不认.
I don’t see that as a useful point as it is the book and not the chapter
that has had that much of a response. We have nothing to indicate that this
is from your chapter. If we do this, we will get the immigration officer to
be thinking you should have a whole book and not just a chapter. What we
present here shows the optimum level of acclaim for you
律师材料把关挺严的,所以PL压缩成了10页纸.
avatar
d*0
2
赶紧换

need
if

【在 z******i 的大作中提到】
: google scholar的引用,然后用ISI的citation percentile,他不认.
: If we are to use specific data about citations to show comparisons, we need
: to use appropriate data. I know that ISI data on citations is different (
: typically lower) than what you get in Googlescholar. If we are to compare
: your citations to the field, we need to use consistent data. Feel free to
: show me ISI data on your citations and I may incorporate that along with
: adding the ISI baseline documentation.
: 我发表5片paper在同一个杂志(专业内journal rank排名第一),他不认.
: As journal rank, etc. I do not consider this as useful. It is likely that if
: your case is challenged it will be because the immigration officer thinks

avatar
z*i
3
PL都搞完了,咋换.

【在 d*****0 的大作中提到】
: 赶紧换
:
: need
: if

avatar
p*r
4
这个主和阿姨哦应该是一伙的
avatar
t*f
5
有了本版,有了名媛,
移民律师没啥用,他只会说:我要这个那个。
差一点就说:你有诺贝尔奖吗?
CNM,老子啥都有了,还找你干嘛?

need
if

【在 z******i 的大作中提到】
: google scholar的引用,然后用ISI的citation percentile,他不认.
: If we are to use specific data about citations to show comparisons, we need
: to use appropriate data. I know that ISI data on citations is different (
: typically lower) than what you get in Googlescholar. If we are to compare
: your citations to the field, we need to use consistent data. Feel free to
: show me ISI data on your citations and I may incorporate that along with
: adding the ISI baseline documentation.
: 我发表5片paper在同一个杂志(专业内journal rank排名第一),他不认.
: As journal rank, etc. I do not consider this as useful. It is likely that if
: your case is challenged it will be because the immigration officer thinks

avatar
u*r
6
这个是公司律师?版上移民律师基本都给包办了
avatar
T*3
7
Z & A?
Why not DIY or change lawyer?
You have complained many times.
avatar
D*a
8
是老美律师吧?这些应该都可以放到PL里的啊?

need
if

【在 z******i 的大作中提到】
: google scholar的引用,然后用ISI的citation percentile,他不认.
: If we are to use specific data about citations to show comparisons, we need
: to use appropriate data. I know that ISI data on citations is different (
: typically lower) than what you get in Googlescholar. If we are to compare
: your citations to the field, we need to use consistent data. Feel free to
: show me ISI data on your citations and I may incorporate that along with
: adding the ISI baseline documentation.
: 我发表5片paper在同一个杂志(专业内journal rank排名第一),他不认.
: As journal rank, etc. I do not consider this as useful. It is likely that if
: your case is challenged it will be because the immigration officer thinks

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。