NSC EB1a 140 RFE 0920# Immigration - 落地生根
n*y
1 楼
EB1a claim 了老三样，昨天收到了 140 的RFE。烦请各位帮忙指点一下如何回复？多
谢！
Timeline:
PD: 3月28；
9月8号PP；
9月20号 RFE
Background:
Field: Industrial Engineering
Publications: 8 journals + 12 conferences; citation: ~100
Patent #1: US patent, granted, licensed and commercialized;
Patent #2 & #3: WO patents, commercialized globally.
Review: 50+; 3 conference chairs; 1 conference committee; 1 associate editor
of an international journal
REF主要是质疑了 contribution，版上考古了一下，发现除了模板challenge
contribution外，还challenge 了 patent 以及 conference papers:
1. 上千引用。
2. 我是co-inventor of a patent，"but the evidence simply shows that you are
a productive member of your research team, but hardly establish that your '
achievement have been recognized int he field of expertise' "
3. conference papers does not demonstrate original contributions.
To assist in determining whether the alien's contributions are original and
of major significance in the field, you may submit objective, independent
evidence:
.that people throughout the field currently consider the alien's work
important
.that the alien's contributions have provoked widespread public commentary
in the field.
.that the alien's publications have garnered a significant number of
citations
.that the alien's work is being implemented by others, evidence such as:
-contracts with companies using the alien's products
-licensed technology being used by others currently being utilized and
shown to be significant int he field
----------RFE 回复策略-----
To be updated
谢！
Timeline:
PD: 3月28；
9月8号PP；
9月20号 RFE
Background:
Field: Industrial Engineering
Publications: 8 journals + 12 conferences; citation: ~100
Patent #1: US patent, granted, licensed and commercialized;
Patent #2 & #3: WO patents, commercialized globally.
Review: 50+; 3 conference chairs; 1 conference committee; 1 associate editor
of an international journal
REF主要是质疑了 contribution，版上考古了一下，发现除了模板challenge
contribution外，还challenge 了 patent 以及 conference papers:
1. 上千引用。
2. 我是co-inventor of a patent，"but the evidence simply shows that you are
a productive member of your research team, but hardly establish that your '
achievement have been recognized int he field of expertise' "
3. conference papers does not demonstrate original contributions.
To assist in determining whether the alien's contributions are original and
of major significance in the field, you may submit objective, independent
evidence:
.that people throughout the field currently consider the alien's work
important
.that the alien's contributions have provoked widespread public commentary
in the field.
.that the alien's publications have garnered a significant number of
citations
.that the alien's work is being implemented by others, evidence such as:
-contracts with companies using the alien's products
-licensed technology being used by others currently being utilized and
shown to be significant int he field
----------RFE 回复策略-----
To be updated
