CookSwt: Xml to Swt preview - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Java - 爪哇娇娃

CookSwt: Xml to Swt preview

CookSwt: Xml to Swt preview# Java - 爪哇娇娃

c*t2004-08-26 07:08

1 楼

http://cookxml.sourceforge.net/cookswt/
The only thing that is lacking is the synchronization of button states.
There seems no listener for enable/disable state.
Resources such as font/color/image will be automatically disposed.

c*s2004-08-26 07:08

2 楼

This works better for me
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/jellyswt.html

【在 c*****t 的大作中提到】

: http://cookxml.sourceforge.net/cookswt/
: The only thing that is lacking is the synchronization of button states.
: There seems no listener for enable/disable state.
: Resources such as font/color/image will be automatically disposed.

c*t2004-08-26 07:08

3 楼

hmm, where better ah?
1. As for menu, I don't see the difference.
2. As for layout, CookSwt is better. gridData/rowData etc are really
the layout information for the container. Putting them inside the
child component obscure the layout, particularly when you have child
composite component which in turn has its own layout. Also, CookSwt
allows FormLayout.
3. CookSwt has arrays support such as String[], etc. So, you can
do

【在 c*****s 的大作中提到】

: This works better for me
: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/jellyswt.html

c*s2004-08-26 07:08

4 楼

Well, they are doing the same thing so one of them can not be more POWERFUL
than the other. The difference is kind of syntax sugar.
$ expression is used in Velocity, ANT and all jelly syntax in the
same way even the implementations are different. I've been using velocity for
more than 3 years, and using jelly since it was born two years ago. I would
prefer it.
Jelly is so generic that people can use it to do ANYTHING related to XML.
Actually in the two companies I worked in China and US, all xml

【在 c*****t 的大作中提到】

: hmm, where better ah?
: 1. As for menu, I don't see the difference.
: 2. As for layout, CookSwt is better. gridData/rowData etc are really
: the layout information for the container. Putting them inside the
: child component obscure the layout, particularly when you have child
: composite component which in turn has its own layout. Also, CookSwt
: allows FormLayout.
: 3. CookSwt has arrays support such as String[], etc. So, you can
: do
: