avatar
Core J2EE Design Pattern# Java - 爪哇娇娃
g*y
1
I saw a lot of people rave about this book. Anyone read this book has some
opinion?
I, for one, think:
* This book is light years away from "Design Pattern", in sense of originality
and creativity
* Many "patterns" are just standard feature of J2EE. It's more like a
explanation of standard feature rather than some real insightful thoughts. If
J2EE specification gets modified because of this book, I would take back my
words. But I seriously doubt that.
* The author definitely enables "VERBOSE" mo
avatar
d*s
2
I am not sure but I believe this is the SUN blueprints Patterns, or similar
to them.

originality
If
dizzling
just

【在 g**********y 的大作中提到】
: I saw a lot of people rave about this book. Anyone read this book has some
: opinion?
: I, for one, think:
: * This book is light years away from "Design Pattern", in sense of originality
: and creativity
: * Many "patterns" are just standard feature of J2EE. It's more like a
: explanation of standard feature rather than some real insightful thoughts. If
: J2EE specification gets modified because of this book, I would take back my
: words. But I seriously doubt that.
: * The author definitely enables "VERBOSE" mo

avatar
c*g
3
My personal opinion, most sun blueprints are crap, boring writing style
and not much useful stuff. BTW GOF book is really worth the money. I
like its textbook style much.

【在 d****s 的大作中提到】
: I am not sure but I believe this is the SUN blueprints Patterns, or similar
: to them.
:
: originality
: If
: dizzling
: just

avatar
d*s
4

Gang of Four's patterns are for lower level, typically detail designs.
Sun BluePrints are higher, for stucture system designs. Some of them
are particular for EJB/J2EE, but others are pretty generic.

【在 c**g 的大作中提到】
: My personal opinion, most sun blueprints are crap, boring writing style
: and not much useful stuff. BTW GOF book is really worth the money. I
: like its textbook style much.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。