关于OPT90天unemployed过期，是不是只要拿到OFFER就可以了，有经验的进来说说？# JobHunting - 待字闺中
b*d
1 楼
Second, NSF must help increase public trust in science. A Pew Research
Center study last year showed a decline in the public’s trust of scientists
and scientific findings. And Nature magazine found in a survey of
researchers that more than 70% have tried and failed to reproduce another
scientist’s published results, which is considered essential for legitimate
scientific inquiry.
Publication of flawed basic research can have devastating economic and human
impacts. A recent study found that $28 billion a year is spent on research
in the field of biology alone that can’t be reproduced, while retractions
of published studies have risen 25% in the last five years.
Reproducibility is the gold standard of science, and NSF should be leading
the charge towards finding solutions to improving reproducibility and
replication. The AICA directed a study to be conducted by the National
Academies of Science, which I hope will help restore the trust of the
American people in our science institutions.
Some have declared that raising these questions or taking a critical look at
how NSF has done business for nearly 70 years is somehow “anti-science.”
It’s not. It is the nature of science to ask questions, seek new solutions,
and never stop experimenting. We should not ask anything less of our
federal science agencies as we join together, in the words of President
Trump, “in a great national effort to rebuild our country and to restore
its promise for all of our people.”
Congressman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is the chairman of the House Science,
Space, and Technology Committee.
Center study last year showed a decline in the public’s trust of scientists
and scientific findings. And Nature magazine found in a survey of
researchers that more than 70% have tried and failed to reproduce another
scientist’s published results, which is considered essential for legitimate
scientific inquiry.
Publication of flawed basic research can have devastating economic and human
impacts. A recent study found that $28 billion a year is spent on research
in the field of biology alone that can’t be reproduced, while retractions
of published studies have risen 25% in the last five years.
Reproducibility is the gold standard of science, and NSF should be leading
the charge towards finding solutions to improving reproducibility and
replication. The AICA directed a study to be conducted by the National
Academies of Science, which I hope will help restore the trust of the
American people in our science institutions.
Some have declared that raising these questions or taking a critical look at
how NSF has done business for nearly 70 years is somehow “anti-science.”
It’s not. It is the nature of science to ask questions, seek new solutions,
and never stop experimenting. We should not ask anything less of our
federal science agencies as we join together, in the words of President
Trump, “in a great national effort to rebuild our country and to restore
its promise for all of our people.”
Congressman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is the chairman of the House Science,
Space, and Technology Committee.
