美国佛罗里达一富翁为保留财产收养自己女友当女儿# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
m*e
1 楼
9月23日 priority date
10月18日 收到RFE的来信
我的背景介绍：07年4月来美做BME的postdoc，此前的专业是ME. 今年7月从postdoc升
到了research assistant scientist，然后开始DIY申请绿卡（NIW）.国内在ME领域发
了10篇paper，有一些奖励（包括两个national的），引用大约40次（他引31次左右）
；来美后，在BME领域发了9篇paper，无奖励，引用只有17次（他引只有6次），另有3
篇会议的paper.
我提交了6封推荐信，包括国内博士的老板，现在的老板，国内的一位教授，新加坡的
一位助理教授，美国的一位副教授，和一位州议员。
RFE的信件有一页多一点，其中说道：
While the beneficiary's work has clearly impressed some experts in the field
of biomedical engineering, the record does not demonstrate that the
petitioner has established a track record of success that would provide a
strong assurance of future, national benefit to the United States. Please
submit evidence to establish that "the beneficiary's past record" justifies
projections of future benefit to the nation.
The record includes evidence of the citation of the beneficiary's work by
others. Scientific footnotes in the research papers of others do not in and
of itself denote the level of the beneficiary's impact on the field of
endeavor. While they may demonstrate that others are aware of his work,
references to his work without evaluation are insufficient to establish its
significance.
The petitioner must establish that the beneficiary has a past record of
specific prior achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a
whole. The beneficiary's previous influence on the field as a whole must
justify projections of future benefit to the national interest. The
petitioner must establish, in some capacity, the beneficiary's ability to
serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the
majority of others in the field. The suggestion that such methods might,
possibly at some future date, be beneficial is not sufficient to establish
eligibility for a national interest waiver.
看到这封信真是非常郁闷。我知道自己材料的硬伤在于citation，但因为是从ME改到
BME，来美后前两年基本都没出什么成果，后面发的文章一方面是发了没多久，影响力
不够；另一方面也和作的东西有关，范围很窄。
请教版上各位，收到这样的RFE，我应当怎样应对？通过的可能性有多大？我需要做哪
些额外的准备，是否再多找几封推荐信呢？谢谢！
10月18日 收到RFE的来信
我的背景介绍：07年4月来美做BME的postdoc，此前的专业是ME. 今年7月从postdoc升
到了research assistant scientist，然后开始DIY申请绿卡（NIW）.国内在ME领域发
了10篇paper，有一些奖励（包括两个national的），引用大约40次（他引31次左右）
；来美后，在BME领域发了9篇paper，无奖励，引用只有17次（他引只有6次），另有3
篇会议的paper.
我提交了6封推荐信，包括国内博士的老板，现在的老板，国内的一位教授，新加坡的
一位助理教授，美国的一位副教授，和一位州议员。
RFE的信件有一页多一点，其中说道：
While the beneficiary's work has clearly impressed some experts in the field
of biomedical engineering, the record does not demonstrate that the
petitioner has established a track record of success that would provide a
strong assurance of future, national benefit to the United States. Please
submit evidence to establish that "the beneficiary's past record" justifies
projections of future benefit to the nation.
The record includes evidence of the citation of the beneficiary's work by
others. Scientific footnotes in the research papers of others do not in and
of itself denote the level of the beneficiary's impact on the field of
endeavor. While they may demonstrate that others are aware of his work,
references to his work without evaluation are insufficient to establish its
significance.
The petitioner must establish that the beneficiary has a past record of
specific prior achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a
whole. The beneficiary's previous influence on the field as a whole must
justify projections of future benefit to the national interest. The
petitioner must establish, in some capacity, the beneficiary's ability to
serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the
majority of others in the field. The suggestion that such methods might,
possibly at some future date, be beneficial is not sufficient to establish
eligibility for a national interest waiver.
看到这封信真是非常郁闷。我知道自己材料的硬伤在于citation，但因为是从ME改到
BME，来美后前两年基本都没出什么成果，后面发的文章一方面是发了没多久，影响力
不够；另一方面也和作的东西有关，范围很窄。
请教版上各位，收到这样的RFE，我应当怎样应对？通过的可能性有多大？我需要做哪
些额外的准备，是否再多找几封推荐信呢？谢谢！
