Redian新闻
>
川普当初应该让COHEN当司法部长,MANAFORT外交部长 (转载)
avatar
川普当初应该让COHEN当司法部长,MANAFORT外交部长 (转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
w*s
1
【 以下文字转载自 Parenting 讨论区 】
发信人: whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /), 信区: Parenting
标 题: Fever medicines 'given to children too readily'
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 1 06:08:50 2011, 美东)
Fever medicines 'given to children too readily'
Health News, The Telegraph, Feb 28.
Parents should not dose up children who have a simple fever on regular
spoonfuls of paracetamol and ibuprofen, according to doctors who say that
doing so could put them at risk.
A misplaced "fever phobia" in society means parents too frequently use both
medicines to bring down even quite slight temperatures, say the
paediatricians, who warn that children often receive accidental overdoses as
a result.
A high temperature is usually the body's way of fighting an infection,
according to advice issued today by the American Academy of Pediatrics, so
to bring it down could actually lengthen the time a child suffers.
Doctors too readily advise parents to give the medicines, known collectively
as "antipyretics", according to the Academy.
The advice comes after a study indicated that children given paracetemol
before 15 months were more than twice as likely to develop asthma by the age
of six as those not given it.
Writing in a clinical report on fever and the use of paracetamol and
ibuprofen in children, the authors warn: "Combination therapy with
acetaminophen [paracetamol] and ibuprofen may place infants and children at
increased risk because of dosing errors and adverse outcomes, and these
potential risks must be carefully considered."
Doctors, they write, should begin "by helping parents understand that fever,
in and of itself, is not known to endanger a generally healthy child".
They explain: "It should be emphasized that fever is not an illness but is,
in fact, a physiologic mechanism that has beneficial effects in fighting
infection."
It slows the spread of bacteria and viruses, enhances white blood cell
production, and "actually helps the body recover more quickly from viral
infections".
Despite this, they say: "Many parents administer antipyretics even though
there is either minimal or no fever."
Half consider it to be a fever even if their child's temperature is not
higher than 38C (101.4F), they report.
Many doctors are happy to advise parents to give paracetamol and ibuprofen
alternately - known as combination therapy - believing side effects are very
rare and minimal.
But the Academy warns: "Unfortunately as many as one-half of parents
administer incorrect doses."
A frequent error is giving children adult-sized doses, while children who
are small for their age can also receive doses that are too high even if
their parents follow box instructions based on age alone.
In Britain, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice)
advises that the use of anti-pyretics "should be considered in children
with fever who appear distressed or unwell".
However, they "should not routinely to used with the sole aim of reducing
body temperature in children with fever who are otherwise well".
Similarly, "paracetamol and ibuprofen should not routinely be given
alternately to children with a fever", although it states this approach "may
be considered if the child does not repsond to the first agent."
The guidance also states: "The views and wishes of parents and carers should
be taken into consideration.".
Children's paracetamol solutions like Calpol and ibuprofen solutions like
Nurofen for Chilren are sold over the counter in chemists. Recommended
dosage quantities vary by age.
There are different strength solutions for different ages, meaning it is
possible for parents with different aged children to mix up which they are
giving.
According to the British National Formulary, which GPs consult when
prescribing or advising on medication, children should receive no more than
four doses of the right amount of paracetamol in a 24-hour period, and no
more than four doses of ibuprofen.
Both medications have potential side effects, notes the Academy.
Paracetamol has been linked to asthma, although "causality has not been
demonstrated", while there have been reports of ibuprofen causing stomach
ulcers and bleeding, and leading to kidney problems.
Children who are dehydrated, have heart problems and existing kidney
problems are "at the greatest risk of ibuprofen-related renal toxicity",
they write.
"Questions remain regarding the safety" of combination therapy, say the
authors, led by Dr Janice Sullivan of the University of Louisville Pediatric
Pharmacology Research Unit and Dr Henry Farrar of the University of
Arkansas.
"The possibility that parents will either not receive or not understand
dosing instructions, combined with the wide array of formulations that
contain these drugs, increases the potential for inaccurate dosing or
overdosing," they caution.
"Finally, this practice may only promote the fever phobia that already
exists."
Rather than focusing on temperature alone, doctors should advise parents to
look out for signs of serious illness, make sure their child is drinking
enough, and "advocate a limited number" of doses of medication.
Dr Clare Gerada, chairman of the Royal College of GPs, said the two
medications should be used "only to help a child be comfortable, and not to
chase down a temperature."
However, she said: "I don't think we over-prescribe anti-pyretics and I don'
t think parents give them too readily."
She added: "I think they have their place. The younger the child the more
cautious you have to be."
She did not think that giving ibuprofen and paracetamol together was more
likely to lead to increased dosing errors, saying: "In my experience of 20
years as a GP, parents are usually pretty careful."
"I think the most important thing to be worried about is keeping medicines
out of the reach of children, because some of them taste quite nice."
They could also give "a false sense of security" in depressing a high
temperature with a more serious underlying cause than a mild infection, she
said.
avatar
q*6
2
如题。
最近把材料给律师看了一下。说eb1a有希望,但没给不过退款的offer,给了个不过一
直免费申请直到通过的offer。但同时建议同时申请NIW占pd,NIW给了不过退款的offer。
请问NIW从申请到approve现在一般需要多久?有这个必要上NIW么。
avatar
S*g
3
【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: StephenKing (金博士), 信区: USANews
标 题: 川普当初应该让COHEN当司法部长,MANAFORT外交部长
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Aug 22 22:50:50 2018, 美东)
川普当初应该让COHEN当司法部长,MANAFORT外交部长,FLYNN国防部长
现在江山稳稳的
avatar
n*8
4
同求,谢谢。
avatar
m*j
5
半年到一年,接近一年的比较多
avatar
q*6
6
谢谢分享。
如果NIW申请了。大半年还没approve,但期间申请eb1a也许更快。这样的话,用NIW来
占PD完全没有意义了啊??

【在 m**********j 的大作中提到】
: 半年到一年,接近一年的比较多
avatar
m*j
7

如果你niw和eb1a差不多同时交,eb1a又有信心不会被拒,那niw就没意义
如果eb1a把握不大,觉得可能要二进宫,或者eb1a不想pp,那就niw先占个坑
另外PD是USCIS收到你申请的日期,不是批准的日期。只要最后没有被拒掉,那个PD就
占着了,不管中间拖了多久批准

【在 q**********6 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢分享。
: 如果NIW申请了。大半年还没approve,但期间申请eb1a也许更快。这样的话,用NIW来
: 占PD完全没有意义了啊??

avatar
c*s
8
很有必要呀。
NIW收到申请,你就有了PD。
即使你半年后申请EB1,用PP马上批准,这样提交485的时候,可以按照NIW的PD算,不
是至少早半年拿到EAD嘛
avatar
c*y
9
我要是你就先咬牙申eb1a,pp就15天出结果,如果不行就申niw,然后慢慢再整eb1a
avatar
f*9
10
0.5~1.0 year
avatar
q*6
11
谢谢分享。
可是,如果半年后NIW还没批,但半年后你申EB1A已经批准了,那NIW的这个PD还无效吧
?用的应该是批准的这个EB1A 的PD吧???
我的理解是PD有效的前提是你这个NIW已经批准了,这个PD才有效吧?

【在 c*****s 的大作中提到】
: 很有必要呀。
: NIW收到申请,你就有了PD。
: 即使你半年后申请EB1,用PP马上批准,这样提交485的时候,可以按照NIW的PD算,不
: 是至少早半年拿到EAD嘛

avatar
q*6
12
谢谢。
我没确定这个PD是如何有效的。我的理解是NIW的PD有效的前提是这个NIW被批准了。比
如:
1月1日申请的NIW,3月1日申请的eb1a,pp后3月15日eb1a批准(这个时候NIW还是没信
)。那么PD用的是1月1日,还是3月1日???
多谢。

【在 m**********j 的大作中提到】
:
: 如果你niw和eb1a差不多同时交,eb1a又有信心不会被拒,那niw就没意义
: 如果eb1a把握不大,觉得可能要二进宫,或者eb1a不想pp,那就niw先占个坑
: 另外PD是USCIS收到你申请的日期,不是批准的日期。只要最后没有被拒掉,那个PD就
: 占着了,不管中间拖了多久批准

avatar
c*8
13
NIW 被批准的时候,只要还没有拿到绿卡,就可以用这个老的PD加塞儿 recapture old
PD。
avatar
c*y
14
当然是3/1,没有被批准的140不存在pd


: 谢谢。

: 我没确定这个PD是如何有效的。我的理解是NIW的PD有效的前提是这个NIW被批准
了。比

: 如:

: 1月1日申请的NIW,3月1日申请的eb1a,pp后3月15日eb1a批准(这个时候NIW还
是没信

: )。那么PD用的是1月1日,还是3月1日???

: 多谢。



【在 q**********6 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。
: 我没确定这个PD是如何有效的。我的理解是NIW的PD有效的前提是这个NIW被批准了。比
: 如:
: 1月1日申请的NIW,3月1日申请的eb1a,pp后3月15日eb1a批准(这个时候NIW还是没信
: )。那么PD用的是1月1日,还是3月1日???
: 多谢。

avatar
m*j
15

你在485面试的时候,可以要求面试官给你用更老的PD,也就是1月1号

【在 q**********6 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。
: 我没确定这个PD是如何有效的。我的理解是NIW的PD有效的前提是这个NIW被批准了。比
: 如:
: 1月1日申请的NIW,3月1日申请的eb1a,pp后3月15日eb1a批准(这个时候NIW还是没信
: )。那么PD用的是1月1日,还是3月1日???
: 多谢。

avatar
e*o
16
这个有PD后是不是还要等排期?NIW的排期更长吗?等排期的时候算合法身份吗?

【在 q**********6 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢分享。
: 可是,如果半年后NIW还没批,但半年后你申EB1A已经批准了,那NIW的这个PD还无效吧
: ?用的应该是批准的这个EB1A 的PD吧???
: 我的理解是PD有效的前提是你这个NIW已经批准了,这个PD才有效吧?

avatar
q*6
17
非常感谢。
这么看快速提交一个NIW还是make sense的!!

【在 m**********j 的大作中提到】
:
: 你在485面试的时候,可以要求面试官给你用更老的PD,也就是1月1号

avatar
q*6
18
谢谢。清楚了!

old

【在 c******8 的大作中提到】
: NIW 被批准的时候,只要还没有拿到绿卡,就可以用这个老的PD加塞儿 recapture old
: PD。

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。