Redian新闻
>
please help me with this question
avatar
please help me with this question# Law - 律师事务所
s*1
1
Only an expert in some branch of psychology could understand why Patrick is
behaving irrationally. But no expert is certain of being able to solve
someone else's problem. Patrick wants to devise a solution to his own
behavioral problem.
Which one of the following conclusions can be validliy drawn from the
passage?
A. Patrick does not understand why he is behaving in this way.
B. patrick is not an expert in psychology.
C. Patrick is not certain of being able to devise a solution to his own
behavi
avatar
n*e
2
the question provide the following premise:
one understands why Patrick is behaving irrationally -> he is an expert in
some psychology -> he's not certain to solve sb else's behavioral problem.
only E is correct because it's an inverse negative statement of the above
relationship.
A: there's no indication Patrick does or does not understand why he is
behaving this way. either way, there won't be any violation of the above
relationship.
B: of course Patrick can be an expert. there's no place sugg
avatar
d*2
3
A: Patrick might be an expert himself, so might be able to understand;
B: same as A;
C: it just says that "no expert" is certain, which means that a non-expert,
might be certain, and Patrick might NOT be an expert;
D: "should" is obviously not the correct answer;
E: Charles is certain --> Charles is not an expert --> Charles does not
understand
avatar
s*1
4
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。