【在 o******g 的大作中提到】 : which one are you looking at now?
L*n
11 楼
看来白高兴了,..下面是adobe论坛上的回答, 另外下载链接 还在. 我就不直接post link了,这条cnet新闻页面里有下载 链接,仍然可用, 软件在虚拟机里顺利安装运行。 http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-57562515-263/adobe-release Here is the message from Adobe: On behalf of Adobe Systems Incorporated ... You have heard wrong! Adobe is absolutely not providing free copies of CS2! What is true is that Adobe is terminating the activation servers for CS2 and that for existing licensed users of CS2 who need to reinstall their software, copies of CS2 that don't require activation but do require valid serial numbers are available. (Special serial numbers are provided on the page for each product download.) See <http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1114930>. You are only legally entitled to download and install with that serial number if you have a valid license to the product! - Dov
【在 L***n 的大作中提到】 : 看来白高兴了,..下面是adobe论坛上的回答, 另外下载链接 : 还在. 我就不直接post link了,这条cnet新闻页面里有下载 : 链接,仍然可用, 软件在虚拟机里顺利安装运行。 : http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-57562515-263/adobe-release : Here is the message from Adobe: : On behalf of Adobe Systems Incorporated ... : You have heard wrong! Adobe is absolutely not providing : free copies of CS2! : What is true is that Adobe is terminating the activation : servers for CS2 and that for existing licensed users of CS2
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】 : Really think PS CS2 is less usable than Gimp ... : GIMP has far more useful utils than PS CS2.
s*8
22 楼
所谓 羁鸟念旧林 池鱼思故渊 只有人处于困境的时候才会常常想过去 难道瑟瑟现在 不痛快?
【在 w********d 的大作中提到】 : 不是好习惯
m*5
23 楼
Resize and other normal imaging processing can be easily down with imagemagick. You do NOT need GIMP. If you are familiar with PS, the learning curve of GIMP is very smooth. GIMP is actually as powerful as PS and has much better latex integration. GIMP also has nice support to WACOM Intuos4 I used. For academic image processing, the ImageJ is much much ... more powerful than PS. So I see no reason to buy PS, unless u r industrial user who requires very high productivity and strongly relies on some commercial plug-ins.
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】 : Really think PS CS2 is less usable than Gimp ... : GIMP has far more useful utils than PS CS2.
s*8
26 楼
手y强身 意y健脑 all good
【在 o******g 的大作中提到】 : i have many bad habits
m*5
27 楼
So far it is OK. Before GIMP 2.4 u need to manage them by your own script. After GIMP 2.4, it is not a problem any more: http://gimp.open-source-solution.org/manual/gimp-imaging-color- I am not a GNU/Linux advocator. I think most of the GUI based softwares in Linux suck. But GIMP is more than adequate. Inkscape however needs more work , current status is just usable ... Several problems of GIMP: 1. Before v2.8, it does not support layer groups. 2. the most infamous problem is NO official support for 16bit-per-channel image yet (There is a release plan for GIMP 2.10 and currently unstable version enabled that feature). If you really need this now. U can try the 'industrial'-fork of the GIMP: cinepaint. 3. It does not have built-in CMYK support, you need to work with the CMYK- plugin. a little bit about CinePaint: Many studios such as Disney/Pixar and Industrial Light & Magic are using it as the main 2D tool. Although it is forked from GIMP, it is only superficially resemble GIMP now; the core can be very different. It fully supports DPX, HDR editing and many other features used in film industry. Because cinepaint is ONLY focused on professional users, the doc is bad comparing to GIMP and NO windows version exists. Unless you r very sure GIMP is inadequate, using cinepaint can be painful.
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】 : how's color management in gimp?