this pathology report is close to useless. there is no microscopic description, there are contradictory reference to the same sample (小肠间质瘤 and 小肠纤维钙化结节). they tried to appear modern by doing numerous IHC tests, but the markers are poorly selected and the "pathologist" didn't give any interpretation of the results. basically, you cannot call these people "doctors."
【在 l*h 的大作中提到】 : this pathology report is close to useless. : there is no microscopic description, there are contradictory reference to : the same sample (小肠间质瘤 and 小肠纤维钙化结节). they tried to appear : modern by doing numerous IHC tests, but the markers are poorly selected and : the "pathologist" didn't give any interpretation of the results. : basically, you cannot call these people "doctors."
l*h
7 楼
their 结肠低分化神经内分泌癌 could be correct, but i am not convinced by the evidence presented. say the two common markers, what percentage is 部分? what distribution and percentage is called 灶性? without proper description, you don't even know whether they saw them on tumor cells or some normal tissue. in addition, there is almost no histological grading information. there is a lot more than 低分化 in grading. what size are the cells? what do the nuclei look like? what do the cytoplasms look like?
【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】 : 您好,多谢您的回复!这么说的话单凭这份报告是完全无法确定癌症类型的吗? : : and
j*i
8 楼
Neuroendocrine tumor is a very rare form of colorectal tumor (the same type that former Apple CEO had). Does the patient have the related hormone imbalance symptoms? If not, you may want a second opinion on the glass slides. Targeted therapy works better for adenocarcinoma. How is the CT scan results? Any distant metastases in liver or lung?