j*i
3 楼
榆木疙瘩
n*b
4 楼
可能还是对焦的区别吧。
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
z*n
6 楼
为啥紫边差这么多?什么原理?
x*0
8 楼
眼睛好大啊
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
x*c
10 楼
wait till D3s drops down to 2k
u*q
19 楼
为什么一定要木头的?塑料的成吗?
S*M
20 楼
这个化妆太猛了,JPG直出,脸上一点texture都没有
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
b*n
22 楼
I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
z*n
24 楼
not
using
D300/D700的时候跑焦了?D700和D3理论上对焦,测光,CMOS都是一套,莫非调教的不
同?
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
: with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
: sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
: D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
C*e
25 楼
这菜板是要买个好的贵的100以上的,还是一般的20左右的就没啥差别?
还有厚度有啥说道不?
还有厚度有啥说道不?
C*e
29 楼
我家有个玻璃的菜板,切东西,老吓人了,刀切下去接触到菜板的声音,总让人心跟着
颤一下。只好切水果用了,用的少。
颤一下。只好切水果用了,用的少。
h*a
30 楼
maybe, the smaller f number, the more shallow of depth of field, and so
focus needs more precision, and therefore whatever body has better focusing
system (D3?) will be able to make it correctly focused and so sharper?
not
using
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
: with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
: sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
: D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
focus needs more precision, and therefore whatever body has better focusing
system (D3?) will be able to make it correctly focused and so sharper?
not
using
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
: with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
: sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
: D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
c*o
37 楼
竹子的或者木头的,其他的都不成吧
s*d
39 楼
竹子的干净一些,也耐用一些。
不过剁骨头我不敢用。
不过剁骨头我不敢用。
c*y
48 楼
知名铁丝可不这么认为
"The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
"The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
b*n
50 楼
He is probably true on AFS lens, but for non-afs lens I can tell the
difference with my personal experience.
with
is
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 知名铁丝可不这么认为
: "The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
: AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
: the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
: BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
: electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
difference with my personal experience.
with
is
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 知名铁丝可不这么认为
: "The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
: AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
: the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
: BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
: electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
z*n
51 楼
with
is
这得拆开看看对焦马达一样不一样才行了。电压确实不能100%说明问题。
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 知名铁丝可不这么认为
: "The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
: AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
: the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
: BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
: electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
n*b
53 楼
一个衍生出来的疑问,算DOF的时候,拿85mm/1.4来说,
Subject distance 10 ft
Depth of field 0.35 ft
这个0.35 ft是按Circle of confusion = 0.03mm算出来的。对于看像素的今天,这个0
.03是不是过时了?
Subject distance 10 ft
Depth of field 0.35 ft
这个0.35 ft是按Circle of confusion = 0.03mm算出来的。对于看像素的今天,这个0
.03是不是过时了?
相关阅读
苍井空亮相梅兰芳大剧院,拜访了京剧泰斗梅葆玖及其弟子胡文阁(转载)贴一张后院小新/贪玩不小心搞了卷正片负冲万佛 这个precision t5500怎么样?各位大师们 拍了红烧肉什么的大家觉得,今年holiday season会有08年那么大的折扣么Canon DSLR 用的微距头,价格特便宜的有啥今晚做的手工牛肉丸卷儿这样在室温里堆着是不是一两年就不行了?佳能新百微 还是 planar 50 1.4?这个pentax lx怎么样?唉,又被大师害了。。。大家给推荐个e-mail吧找工作,求祝福。单反数码相机常见英语标识和各种镜头的标识说明这个面试是不是黄了Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3发3个包子!收到nikon onetouch,有个功能很屌