Redian新闻
>
拍了些老美的人像,问隐私问题
avatar
拍了些老美的人像,问隐私问题# PhotoGear - 摄影器材
h*e
1
学校的活动拍的学生,就是随手拍的不是正式的人像啥的,都是不认识的人,传到国内
的网上 人人网之类的,不侵犯隐私吧?
avatar
e*r
2
你说呢?
她们看不到还好,看到你会有麻烦。
正式的需要model release, 不正式的只是要口头问一下

【在 h******e 的大作中提到】
: 学校的活动拍的学生,就是随手拍的不是正式的人像啥的,都是不认识的人,传到国内
: 的网上 人人网之类的,不侵犯隐私吧?

avatar
h*e
3
奥,这样啊,那我删了。。
因为也不认识,估计都找不到了,没法问可不可以。看来是要注意下。。。

【在 e*******r 的大作中提到】
: 你说呢?
: 她们看不到还好,看到你会有麻烦。
: 正式的需要model release, 不正式的只是要口头问一下

avatar
g*k
4
公共场合,想拍什么拍什么
担心话请google photographers rights
avatar
R*a
5
学校的活动未必是公共场合

【在 g****k 的大作中提到】
: 公共场合,想拍什么拍什么
: 担心话请google photographers rights

avatar
a*e
6
公立学校肯定是吧

【在 R***a 的大作中提到】
: 学校的活动未必是公共场合
avatar
R*a
7
这个更是两回事了。
public owned property跟public area基本无关。
五角大楼属于public property,你进去随便拍照试试?

【在 a*******e 的大作中提到】
: 公立学校肯定是吧
avatar
J*n
8
THE TEN LEGAL COMMANDMENTS OF PHOTOGRAPHY
I. Anyone in a public place can take pictures of anything they want. Public
places include parks, sidewalks, malls, etc. Malls? Yeah. Even though it’s
technically private property, being open to the public makes it public space.
II. If you are on public property, you can take pictures of private property
. If a building, for example, is visible from the sidewalk, it’s fair game.
III. If you are on private property and are asked not to take pictures, you
are obligated to honor that request. This includes posted signs.
IV. Sensitive government buildings (military bases, nuclear facilities) can
prohibit photography if it is deemed a threat to national security.
V. People can be photographed if they are in public (without their consent)
unless they have secluded themselves and can expect a reasonable degree of
privacy. Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay. Somebody entering their PIN at
the ATM? Not okay.
VI. The following can almost always be photographed from public places,
despite popular opinion:
accident & fire scenes, criminal activities
bridges & other infrastructure, transportation facilities (i.e. airports)
industrial facilities, Superfund sites
public utilities, residential & commercial buildings
children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Chuck Norris
VII. Although “security” is often given as the reason somebody doesn’t
want you to take photos, it’s rarely valid. Taking a photo of a publicly
visible subject does not constitute terrorism, nor does it infringe on a
company’s trade secrets.
VIII. If you are challenged, you do not have to explain why you are taking
pictures, nor to you have to disclose your identity (except in some cases
when questioned by a law enforcement officer.)
IX. Private parties have very limited rights to detain you against your will
, and can be subject to legal action if they harass you.
X. If someone tries to confiscate your camera and/or film, you don’t have
to give it to them. If they take it by force or threaten you, they can be
liable for things like theft and coercion. Even law enforcement officers
need a court order.
avatar
N*N
9
别听他们吓唬你,除非你所在场合有专人或条令禁止拍照,或者是明显不该拍照的场所
(如公厕、更衣室),或者你要把照片用于商业用途,否则这些照片随你用没有问题。
那些说神马model release的都是半瓶醋。

【在 h******e 的大作中提到】
: 学校的活动拍的学生,就是随手拍的不是正式的人像啥的,都是不认识的人,传到国内
: 的网上 人人网之类的,不侵犯隐私吧?

avatar
d*y
10
求翻译,求摘要。
avatar
g*x
11
reseale是给商业用途准备的
完全两码事

【在 e*******r 的大作中提到】
: 你说呢?
: 她们看不到还好,看到你会有麻烦。
: 正式的需要model release, 不正式的只是要口头问一下

avatar
g*x
12
re
公共场合(五角大楼是public owned,但各种limitation也是"public"的,不属于言论
自由保护范围)随便拍,不让你拍你也有权拍,并且有权用于editorial用途
其他场合(比如别人家),只要给了你consent拍照并且没有明确反对上传,也是没问
题的。

【在 N**********N 的大作中提到】
: 别听他们吓唬你,除非你所在场合有专人或条令禁止拍照,或者是明显不该拍照的场所
: (如公厕、更衣室),或者你要把照片用于商业用途,否则这些照片随你用没有问题。
: 那些说神马model release的都是半瓶醋。

avatar
h*e
13
涨姿势了!谢大家
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。