m*n
2 楼
和全幅比,DR还是差很多啊。下面这个链接说的有点意思,曝光不足的片子,push 5
stop起来,D800还是领先啊。
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3995131
“Did a quick test on DR at ISO100. The left side has correct exposure (
ISO100, 1/200s, f/2.8), right side is under exposure for about 5 stops (
ISO100, 1/6400s, f/2.8), and +5 stop in exposure in Photoshop. DR at ISO100
is roughly as D800 > D500 >=D4 > D5 according to my observation.”
stop起来,D800还是领先啊。
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3995131
“Did a quick test on DR at ISO100. The left side has correct exposure (
ISO100, 1/200s, f/2.8), right side is under exposure for about 5 stops (
ISO100, 1/6400s, f/2.8), and +5 stop in exposure in Photoshop. DR at ISO100
is roughly as D800 > D500 >=D4 > D5 according to my observation.”
b*s
3 楼
同一代技术的cmos改变不了底大吃底小的物理事实
ISO100
【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 和全幅比,DR还是差很多啊。下面这个链接说的有点意思,曝光不足的片子,push 5
: stop起来,D800还是领先啊。
: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3995131
: “Did a quick test on DR at ISO100. The left side has correct exposure (
: ISO100, 1/200s, f/2.8), right side is under exposure for about 5 stops (
: ISO100, 1/6400s, f/2.8), and +5 stop in exposure in Photoshop. DR at ISO100
: is roughly as D800 > D500 >=D4 > D5 according to my observation.”
ISO100
【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 和全幅比,DR还是差很多啊。下面这个链接说的有点意思,曝光不足的片子,push 5
: stop起来,D800还是领先啊。
: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3995131
: “Did a quick test on DR at ISO100. The left side has correct exposure (
: ISO100, 1/200s, f/2.8), right side is under exposure for about 5 stops (
: ISO100, 1/6400s, f/2.8), and +5 stop in exposure in Photoshop. DR at ISO100
: is roughly as D800 > D500 >=D4 > D5 according to my observation.”
h*n
5 楼
看不懂啊,D5怎么会那么差呢?
ISO100
【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 和全幅比,DR还是差很多啊。下面这个链接说的有点意思,曝光不足的片子,push 5
: stop起来,D800还是领先啊。
: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3995131
: “Did a quick test on DR at ISO100. The left side has correct exposure (
: ISO100, 1/200s, f/2.8), right side is under exposure for about 5 stops (
: ISO100, 1/6400s, f/2.8), and +5 stop in exposure in Photoshop. DR at ISO100
: is roughly as D800 > D500 >=D4 > D5 according to my observation.”
ISO100
【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 和全幅比,DR还是差很多啊。下面这个链接说的有点意思,曝光不足的片子,push 5
: stop起来,D800还是领先啊。
: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3995131
: “Did a quick test on DR at ISO100. The left side has correct exposure (
: ISO100, 1/200s, f/2.8), right side is under exposure for about 5 stops (
: ISO100, 1/6400s, f/2.8), and +5 stop in exposure in Photoshop. DR at ISO100
: is roughly as D800 > D500 >=D4 > D5 according to my observation.”
l*8
7 楼
超过D4,那就足够好了阿。考虑进一台了。
m*n
8 楼
看了FM上的这篇,D500 好像也没有比D7200 high iso 好很多。
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1425857
【在 b*****s 的大作中提到】
: 嗯,应该是专门优化高ISO了,术业有专攻
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1425857
【在 b*****s 的大作中提到】
: 嗯,应该是专门优化高ISO了,术业有专攻
l*8
9 楼
我看贴的图D500要好一档。
【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 看了FM上的这篇,D500 好像也没有比D7200 high iso 好很多。
: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1425857
【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 看了FM上的这篇,D500 好像也没有比D7200 high iso 好很多。
: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1425857
s*9
10 楼
要能现在选,我一定选D500而不是D750.
m*n
13 楼
DXO review is out for D500. Not much better than D7200 or D7100. Just FYI.
http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Nikon-D500-sensor-review-Performance-redefined
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4017634
http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Nikon-D500-sensor-review-Performance-redefined
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4017634
D*3
14 楼
d500 just a sports camera
the end
the end
相关阅读
佳能Refurbished的大白收到了,附开箱照和试拍照收到的镜头filter ring 裂了。。。 (转载)请问本版那个爱地的头像是一个烤啦?有喜欢看星星的佛爷么?广角为啥需要大光圈?Canon Warranty label broken三阳35 1.4 尼康AIS35 1.4 适马35 1.4 哪个好?我拍的北极光的照片,一个显示器看正常,另一个显示器看象波形图德叔贴猫,咱也跟着贴猫 (转载)C/N对焦系统比较(文摘)ZE Planar T* 50mm/1.4如何? (转载)国内的报纸真大胆啊请告诉一个佳能十年忠实用户,是不是该跳船了?秋天的蒙特利尔弱问一下用宾得的大师最终买Nex6相机,请拍照问题请教这套小孩火车算deal么砍树回来, 过节喽 (转载)马总的6d出货了新镜头被小孩用沾了唾液的手指摸脏了,怎么办?