Of course. Anybody who claim to have written a novel of significant length while the hand written manuscript that he claims is the ORIGINAL is free of any modification except correction for mistakes in writing out the words is lying. He can claim that manuscript is a cleaned up copy of the original. However, it then can't be used as proof of original authorship.
韩寒从来没说过他的手稿“free of any modification except correction for mistakes in writing out the words” 这是方舟子的论断。 我没看过韩寒的手稿,但是就从板上贴出来的片段,就可以看到有加词减词,甚至有编 号草稿。 衷心劝告一句,对方舟子的论断要查实,不然就会偏听偏信。
length of is However,
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】 : : Of course. Anybody who claim to have written a novel of significant length : while the hand written manuscript that he claims is the ORIGINAL is free of : any modification except correction for mistakes in writing out the words is : lying. : He can claim that manuscript is a cleaned up copy of the original. However, : it then can't be used as proof of original authorship.
x*u
145 楼
In the portions of manuscript that was released, I see no corrections in structure of paragraph and sentences. No change in character's conversations. No deletion of large section of writings. All of the changes are minor corrections. That shows this manuscript can't be the original WORKING MANUSCRIPT. It can only be a clean up copy. Which is meaningless in claiming it proves HH wrote it. So I would recommend you to actually use your brain to think for a moment instead of blinded by your prejudice against Fang.
【在 W**H 的大作中提到】 : 韩寒从来没说过他的手稿“free of any modification except correction for : mistakes in writing out the words” : 这是方舟子的论断。 : 我没看过韩寒的手稿,但是就从板上贴出来的片段,就可以看到有加词减词,甚至有编 : 号草稿。 : 衷心劝告一句,对方舟子的论断要查实,不然就会偏听偏信。 : : length : of : is
W*H
146 楼
你的论断是建立在: 写长篇小说,一定要在初稿上有大规模的结构调整。 这是你的经验论,或者是常识论。 honestly,you are arrogant enough to 100% believe your thoughts= truth. 另外,你忽视了: 1,韩寒写废的10w字 2,朱莲曾说过,韩寒写错的比较多,他就重写一张 3,他的同学狂岛微澜的证词:他写东西一笔成文,甚少修改。
can
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】 : : In the portions of manuscript that was released, I see no corrections in : structure of paragraph and sentences. No change in character's : conversations. No deletion of large section of writings. : All of the changes are minor corrections. : That shows this manuscript can't be the original WORKING MANUSCRIPT. It can : only be a clean up copy. Which is meaningless in claiming it proves HH : wrote it. : So I would recommend you to actually use your brain to think for a moment : instead of blinded by your prejudice against Fang.
x*u
147 楼
1. The 10W words claims doesn't match up with the timeline in his witnesses' stories. 2. Even if he rewrite a whole page if there are too many corrections, I still haven't seen one page where there are just one or two sentences changed. Only minor corrections that don't change the structure and meaning. 3. That is just a blatant lie. You can do that for short stories or essays, but NOT a novel.
【在 W**H 的大作中提到】 : 你的论断是建立在: : 写长篇小说,一定要在初稿上有大规模的结构调整。 : 这是你的经验论,或者是常识论。 : honestly,you are arrogant enough to 100% believe your thoughts= truth. : 另外,你忽视了: : 1,韩寒写废的10w字 : 2,朱莲曾说过,韩寒写错的比较多,他就重写一张 : 3,他的同学狂岛微澜的证词:他写东西一笔成文,甚少修改。 : : can
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】 : : 1. The 10W words claims doesn't match up with the timeline in his witnesses' : stories. : 2. Even if he rewrite a whole page if there are too many corrections, I : still haven't seen one page where there are just one or two sentences : changed. Only minor corrections that don't change the structure and meaning. : 3. That is just a blatant lie. You can do that for short stories or essays, : but NOT a novel.
x*n
149 楼
人家是把韩寒的稿子当成peer review的稿子审了,还审得津津有味的 以显示他的英语和学术有多么多么牛,其实都是BSO的贴子 最好再加一句: the review does not see any value in this paper to be published之类的 真是爽呆了。某些reviewer最喜欢写这种句子了