a*o
10 楼
以后只有直接投稿(Track II)
l*n
11 楼
no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: 以后只有直接投稿(Track II)
in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: 以后只有直接投稿(Track II)
O*e
12 楼
我觉得保留Track III也未尝不可,院士嘛,有点小特权也说得过去,而且呢,我们还
是要
相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
主要
就出现在这些papers上。
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
是要
相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
主要
就出现在这些papers上。
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
l*n
14 楼
其实好像就比 citation 的话 Track I 比 Track II 还多,average 来讲,
Track III 最差。
要是 PNAS 就定位在主要接受 papers not accepted by science 也还好了,
毕竟经过 science 的 review 和 revision, 应该不会太差。而且也给 authors
至少提供一个 safety net,文章不会因为 unlucky 碰到一个 harsh reviewer
就给 free fall 了。
【在 O******e 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得保留Track III也未尝不可,院士嘛,有点小特权也说得过去,而且呢,我们还
: 是要
: 相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
: 主要
: 就出现在这些papers上。
:
: 2
Track III 最差。
要是 PNAS 就定位在主要接受 papers not accepted by science 也还好了,
毕竟经过 science 的 review 和 revision, 应该不会太差。而且也给 authors
至少提供一个 safety net,文章不会因为 unlucky 碰到一个 harsh reviewer
就给 free fall 了。
【在 O******e 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得保留Track III也未尝不可,院士嘛,有点小特权也说得过去,而且呢,我们还
: 是要
: 相信他们对自己工作的判断力。但那个Track I的弊病就太大了,猫腻太多,劣质产品
: 主要
: 就出现在这些papers上。
:
: 2
n*d
15 楼
这样的话还是尽量投奔院士比较好
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
a*o
16 楼
谢谢更正
院士福利不错呀
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
院士福利不错呀
2
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: no. only track I (communicated by XXX) will be eliminated this time.
: in fact, they increased the number of track III (contributed by YYY) from 2
: to 4 papers per year. however, there are many more restrictions applied.
: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.shtml
相关阅读
数学-》物理—》化学-》生物学-》心理学->社会学 是不是这个递进关系?美国科学家:已成功给老鼠植入假记忆 (zt)真是不作什么,不知道什么, 做晶体也没出路啊?乌鸦笑猪黑极度厌恶科研工作 (转载)求助:Postdoc offer的问题生物博士论文居然可以这么写我也说生物和数理化的差别弱问western blot数学物理这种简单的学科不是从来就随便学学就行了么请大家推荐一个好用又便宜的WB兔二抗学生物需要一些情商,学数学智商就够了so sad 是离开的时候了, 求指点 (转载)scientific communication 的工作 (转载)TCGA microRNA表达水平生物学与数理化的根本区别。请问版上牛人:什么promoter在mouse astrocytes里面表达比较好啊?small ncRNA 问题求教那么我坦诚地讲一下这个各科phd的问题动不动就喜欢谈论智商的一般都是二等残废