r*n
2 楼
本只是
芸芸众生一平庸,
浩瀚大海一滴水。
在自心中却
惟我最独特,
惟我应最好,
惟我最要受代见。
现实中,
自己都只把自己当根葱,
他人皆是眼中一粒尘。
平平常常做人吧,
平平常常处事吧,
平平常常修行吧。
我只是平凡一俗人,
他人眼中一微尘。
芸芸众生一平庸,
浩瀚大海一滴水。
在自心中却
惟我最独特,
惟我应最好,
惟我最要受代见。
现实中,
自己都只把自己当根葱,
他人皆是眼中一粒尘。
平平常常做人吧,
平平常常处事吧,
平平常常修行吧。
我只是平凡一俗人,
他人眼中一微尘。
L*o
3 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Faculty 讨论区 】
发信人: LearnBio (好好学生物), 信区: Faculty
标 题: 还没成稿的东西到会议上去报告好不好?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Nov 8 21:56:25 2011, 美东)
很热门的一个东西,有了一些似乎很有冲击力的结果,但是还没成稿。如果拿到会议上
但不是大型会议上去报告,好不好?
发信人: LearnBio (好好学生物), 信区: Faculty
标 题: 还没成稿的东西到会议上去报告好不好?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Nov 8 21:56:25 2011, 美东)
很热门的一个东西,有了一些似乎很有冲击力的结果,但是还没成稿。如果拿到会议上
但不是大型会议上去报告,好不好?
c*e
8 楼
agree with upstairs, it really depends on your field
I*a
10 楼
不怕大实验室竞争,就去。
i*g
13 楼
绝对绝对不要
一时虚荣,后患无穷
何况,申请经费不是看你这种数据,还是先发了文章,再下一步
一时虚荣,后患无穷
何况,申请经费不是看你这种数据,还是先发了文章,再下一步
l*e
14 楼
my recent paper was almost screwed by a big fish in the field. it ended up
of being published back-to-back, mine and theirs. i once presented key
founding work for my postdoc interview in that asshole's lab. I was of
course rejected and several months later heard that a same story was under
review by a decent, but not great journal. At that time, my paper was under
revision for Science!!! So, we had to pull it out and sent it to the same
journal. We had no alternative better way, as science revision would take a
much longer time, and we lost novelty if they published theirs first!!!
fuck them! I was pretty much sure that they had no comparable data at the
time. this idea was reenforced afterwards when i had a chat with some folks
from that asshole's lab. BTW, the asshole's lab is a hhmi lab and the first
author of the paper is a chinese too. thanks, my fellow brother!!!
so, 绝对绝对不要!!!
of being published back-to-back, mine and theirs. i once presented key
founding work for my postdoc interview in that asshole's lab. I was of
course rejected and several months later heard that a same story was under
review by a decent, but not great journal. At that time, my paper was under
revision for Science!!! So, we had to pull it out and sent it to the same
journal. We had no alternative better way, as science revision would take a
much longer time, and we lost novelty if they published theirs first!!!
fuck them! I was pretty much sure that they had no comparable data at the
time. this idea was reenforced afterwards when i had a chat with some folks
from that asshole's lab. BTW, the asshole's lab is a hhmi lab and the first
author of the paper is a chinese too. thanks, my fellow brother!!!
so, 绝对绝对不要!!!
L*o
15 楼
看来受教训不少,那还是不讲了。也许贴几张无关痛痒的图而不涉及关键问题。
under
a
folks
【在 l******e 的大作中提到】
: my recent paper was almost screwed by a big fish in the field. it ended up
: of being published back-to-back, mine and theirs. i once presented key
: founding work for my postdoc interview in that asshole's lab. I was of
: course rejected and several months later heard that a same story was under
: review by a decent, but not great journal. At that time, my paper was under
: revision for Science!!! So, we had to pull it out and sent it to the same
: journal. We had no alternative better way, as science revision would take a
: much longer time, and we lost novelty if they published theirs first!!!
: fuck them! I was pretty much sure that they had no comparable data at the
: time. this idea was reenforced afterwards when i had a chat with some folks
under
a
folks
【在 l******e 的大作中提到】
: my recent paper was almost screwed by a big fish in the field. it ended up
: of being published back-to-back, mine and theirs. i once presented key
: founding work for my postdoc interview in that asshole's lab. I was of
: course rejected and several months later heard that a same story was under
: review by a decent, but not great journal. At that time, my paper was under
: revision for Science!!! So, we had to pull it out and sent it to the same
: journal. We had no alternative better way, as science revision would take a
: much longer time, and we lost novelty if they published theirs first!!!
: fuck them! I was pretty much sure that they had no comparable data at the
: time. this idea was reenforced afterwards when i had a chat with some folks
D*a
16 楼
取决于老板牛不牛了。
IGF resistance和Alzheimer病, 2009年一月德国一个实验室六月Epub在FASEB J发出
来的,Dillin 他老人家六月投的Cell。
IGF resistance和Alzheimer病, 2009年一月德国一个实验室六月Epub在FASEB J发出
来的,Dillin 他老人家六月投的Cell。
P*B
17 楼
the hhmi group is indeed shameless and greedy... i am curious who they are
under
a
folks
【在 l******e 的大作中提到】
: my recent paper was almost screwed by a big fish in the field. it ended up
: of being published back-to-back, mine and theirs. i once presented key
: founding work for my postdoc interview in that asshole's lab. I was of
: course rejected and several months later heard that a same story was under
: review by a decent, but not great journal. At that time, my paper was under
: revision for Science!!! So, we had to pull it out and sent it to the same
: journal. We had no alternative better way, as science revision would take a
: much longer time, and we lost novelty if they published theirs first!!!
: fuck them! I was pretty much sure that they had no comparable data at the
: time. this idea was reenforced afterwards when i had a chat with some folks
under
a
folks
【在 l******e 的大作中提到】
: my recent paper was almost screwed by a big fish in the field. it ended up
: of being published back-to-back, mine and theirs. i once presented key
: founding work for my postdoc interview in that asshole's lab. I was of
: course rejected and several months later heard that a same story was under
: review by a decent, but not great journal. At that time, my paper was under
: revision for Science!!! So, we had to pull it out and sent it to the same
: journal. We had no alternative better way, as science revision would take a
: much longer time, and we lost novelty if they published theirs first!!!
: fuck them! I was pretty much sure that they had no comparable data at the
: time. this idea was reenforced afterwards when i had a chat with some folks
相关阅读
请问PLOS Pathogens审稿速度如何?Informatics专业的童鞋在药厂R&D Center的发展方向请问要如何准备才能进入工业界?Nat. Biotech.多久才知道是否送审?文献全文求助院士是不是也分CLASS?请教,ERA commons是干什么的?请教:Leukemia/Lymphoma转染PostDoc Position响应不要八卦要学术的号召,问个学术问题,有关蛋白表达的有没有人没评上炸药奖,然后声明以后再也不参选了?今天地震时刚好在NSF开Panel Meeting大家有推荐的Phagosome marker吗?请问Craig Thompson的lab好进不?Where to buy primary rat embryo fibroblast (REF) cells?饶毅过几年可能连院长都没得当了.饶毅:希望他们改正错误请教Bioinformatics职业规划~~~please recommend a inducible expression system《自然和科学》:一本山寨杂志的国际玩笑