各位大牛同仁，请推荐几个不错的蛋白质研究实验室# Biology - 生物学
j*w
1 楼
我越来越对研究生物蛋白质感兴趣了，想拿到博士学位后再读一个生化博士，专门研究
蛋白质功能和结构。做生物的都知道，想取得不错的成果，除了自身努力外，与实验室
的水平分不开。所以，想听听各位的意见，有没有了解这个的，谢谢先！
蛋白质功能和结构。做生物的都知道，想取得不错的成果，除了自身努力外，与实验室
的水平分不开。所以，想听听各位的意见，有没有了解这个的，谢谢先！
n*g
2 楼
请说说具体方向啊，这个太笼统了，大部分实验室都做点蛋白相关的啊
d*m
3 楼
LZ这么有志向，那给你推荐了牛的。SYG，而且都不用再杀鸡了
b*y
4 楼
Are you sure that you are not naive? Ask yourself this question for ten
times over a month. Come with the same question after that.
times over a month. Come with the same question after that.
j*w
5 楼
像SYG那样的做蛋白的，但是要在美国的
【在 n***g 的大作中提到】
: 请说说具体方向啊，这个太笼统了，大部分实验室都做点蛋白相关的啊
【在 n***g 的大作中提到】
: 请说说具体方向啊，这个太笼统了，大部分实验室都做点蛋白相关的啊
j*w
6 楼
那还不如回去做薄厚呢
要美国这边的
【在 d********m 的大作中提到】
: LZ这么有志向，那给你推荐了牛的。SYG，而且都不用再杀鸡了
要美国这边的
【在 d********m 的大作中提到】
: LZ这么有志向，那给你推荐了牛的。SYG，而且都不用再杀鸡了
j*w
7 楼
为什么这么说？
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: Are you sure that you are not naive? Ask yourself this question for ten
: times over a month. Come with the same question after that.
【在 b******y 的大作中提到】
: Are you sure that you are not naive? Ask yourself this question for ten
: times over a month. Come with the same question after that.
b*y
8 楼
If it were 15 years ago, your thought might lead you somewhere substantial,
i.e. being a successful PI in a decent institute. However, we are in year
2012. There are 1000+ labs actively in solving structures in the world. X-
ray crystallography is so mature that anyone of them can solve important
targets on yearly basis. Let alone EM is catching up and NMR steals a small
slice. By the time you are ready to do something, all the low hanging fruits
are gone and the entry barrier to any specific fields is too high.
However, the above-mentioned problem is not most worrisome one. There will
simply be not many positions (faculty or industry) available for x-ray
crystallographers, while there will be more x-ray crystallographers floating
around. I can bet my money on this statement.
Why bother? Or at least be cautious.
i.e. being a successful PI in a decent institute. However, we are in year
2012. There are 1000+ labs actively in solving structures in the world. X-
ray crystallography is so mature that anyone of them can solve important
targets on yearly basis. Let alone EM is catching up and NMR steals a small
slice. By the time you are ready to do something, all the low hanging fruits
are gone and the entry barrier to any specific fields is too high.
However, the above-mentioned problem is not most worrisome one. There will
simply be not many positions (faculty or industry) available for x-ray
crystallographers, while there will be more x-ray crystallographers floating
around. I can bet my money on this statement.
Why bother? Or at least be cautious.
相关阅读
有人知道buccal swab DNA提取的方法吗？求篇Nature Reviews Drug Discovery的paper文章接受了，不错的圣诞礼物讨教大牛，关于RNAseq数据发表Update: 电话面试-- 大家觉得我还有戏吗 (转载)版上有熟悉Wendell Lim组的前辈么求一系列paper，有包子问siRNA knockdown 基因的问题我们系有个tenure track position opening生物类博士找到工业界工作的占百分之几？博后个人财经--人算不如天算，但还得算问下ON跑蛋白胶电压的问题怎样冻存酵母strain询问一个关于肿瘤免疫的问题EMSA 没有结果土博也不比洋博差——Cheng Yifan-【饶毅】关于审稿人的资格问题，谢谢各位前辈了制备iPS cell 的疑惑请教Yeast问题求教网上签证系统，签证邮寄地址在签证当天还可以改吗？