生物研究的現狀就是如此不公平!Corresponding author can take all the credits, since they are more adavanced in their career development. 人为刀俎 我为鱼 肉!
g*n
7 楼
please share if you find some.
D*a
8 楼
我喜欢这句话! Moreover, Jules was very far from the actual‘bench work’. I think it fair to say that he has always felt better among vertebrate immunologists than Drosophila geneticists.
我感觉他当时的poste在法国应该是chargé de recherche吧,这个已经是终身职位了 ,是独立的科学家,不是博后。 而且法国对实验室(lab)和研究单位有时候分的不是很明确,以前有一阵子叫unité, 后来改成centre什么的,我今年新签的合同上,合同是沿用了n多年的那种样本,问 directeur de lab是谁,我跟我老板研究了一下,一致认为他们是问我们centre de recherche的头儿的名字。。。 他这里把他大老板Hoffmann叫lab的头儿,我看有点像unité的头儿,而不像是巨无霸 实验室那种实验室leader。唉他应该用法语写一份才是。。。
Today, editors of top journals prefer a “twisted story” that turns around a single concept. Although such ‘hot’ papers are exciting on first reading, they often provide a biased view of reality, pushing their interpretation too hard. Descriptive papers have the advantage of providing a solid foundation to the field and they are less error-prone. 这句话也很强大呀!
D*y
26 楼
和我的感觉一模一样。现在好多所谓的mechanism-based paper其实就是shit
around provide a biased view of reality, pushing providing a solid foundation to the field
【在 i*********0 的大作中提到】 : Today, editors of top journals prefer a “twisted story” that turns around : a single concept. : Although such ‘hot’ papers are exciting on first reading, they often provide a biased view of reality, pushing : their interpretation too hard. Descriptive papers have the advantage of providing a solid foundation to the field : and they are less error-prone. : 这句话也很强大呀!