做生物的,有多少人这样认为 idea is cheap? 有多少比例就有多少比例的垃圾 --做老板这样认为更是垃圾中的人渣--在误导学生
b*n
2 楼
cheap ideas are cheap. 有些老板只有cheap ideas,说出这种话也正常。
w*r
3 楼
ideas are indeed very cheap. Could you publish an idea in nature or science?
【在 f**d 的大作中提到】 : 做生物的,有多少人这样认为 idea is cheap? : 有多少比例就有多少比例的垃圾 : --做老板这样认为更是垃圾中的人渣--在误导学生
d*d
4 楼
But would you call an idea cheap if it leads to a paper in CNS? Would you share your ideas with your competitors if you really believe those ideas are good ones? Most ideas may be cheap, but still most papers are derived from ideas.
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】 : ideas are indeed very cheap. : Could you publish an idea in nature or science?
w*r
5 楼
People could generate many ideas daily, I am sure one of them may be true and give you a good paper but it is difficult to tell which one is the promising one. that's why I believe that the meaning behind is that only the data counts, only the ability to materialize the idea counts, as so many people could have some ideas. thinking is important but ideas are just cheap.
are
【在 d****d 的大作中提到】 : But would you call an idea cheap if it leads to a paper in CNS? Would you : share your ideas with your competitors if you really believe those ideas are : good ones? : Most ideas may be cheap, but still most papers are derived from ideas.
n*k
6 楼
well, indeed ideas are pretty cheap...Many have enough ideas to potentially pull off a dozen NCS papers a year...
【在 f**d 的大作中提到】 : 做生物的,有多少人这样认为 idea is cheap? : 有多少比例就有多少比例的垃圾 : --做老板这样认为更是垃圾中的人渣--在误导学生
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】 : People could generate many ideas daily, I am sure one of them may be true : and give you a good paper but it is difficult to tell which one is the : promising one. : that's why I believe that the meaning behind is that only the data counts, : only the ability to materialize the idea counts, as so many people could : have some ideas. : thinking is important but ideas are just cheap. : : are
I really don't think people could learn that ability from Ph.D.training. Those kind of things are not trained but just part of personality. like what in your previous posts, no matter how hard you tried, some dude just cannot catch you. you are like stephenking's avatar.
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】 : I really don't think people could learn that ability from Ph.D.training. : Those kind of things are not trained but just part of personality. : like what in your previous posts, no matter how hard you tried, some dude : just cannot catch you. : you are like stephenking's avatar.
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】 : I really don't think people could learn that ability from Ph.D.training. : Those kind of things are not trained but just part of personality. : like what in your previous posts, no matter how hard you tried, some dude : just cannot catch you. : you are like stephenking's avatar.
a*r
20 楼
达尔文的进化论, 爱因斯坦的相对论,以及元素周期律算不算cheap idea? 我觉得Bronstein 说的好, cheap ideas are cheap.
c*7
21 楼
我觉得谁来给个idea cheap or not cheap的定义大家再来讨论吧,否则这个topic实在 是太cheap了。。。
n*k
22 楼
cannot agree on your point...much can be trained unless u r talking about supervision etc...
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】 : I really don't think people could learn that ability from Ph.D.training. : Those kind of things are not trained but just part of personality. : like what in your previous posts, no matter how hard you tried, some dude : just cannot catch you. : you are like stephenking's avatar.
n*k
23 楼
Yes and No, I would say...Many good postdoc can do this...but how many of them would ever have a chance to get such an idea funded and materlized... Life science is still in its infancy and so many open questions...except some which may need vision etc, most are tech/methodology dependent or resource-demanding, rather than intellectually challenging...I am talking about individuals with reasonable intelligence...