i want say something controversial. even those that can be repeated, it is still clinically useless in many case . So it makes no difference whether it can be repeated or not. just read these papers for fun, that is it.
【在 c**k 的大作中提到】 : i want say something controversial. : even those that can be repeated, it is still clinically useless in many case : . So it makes no difference whether it can be repeated or not. : just read these papers for fun, that is it.
Claiming that doing science is for the sake of science or curiosity is indeed very honorable and glorious, but honestly, can be very pretentious, too. Let's face it: where do we receive our research funding, and what are the funding agencies' expectations? Regardless of whether it's tax payers' money or some private foundation, eventually the beneficiaries would like to see something tangible in return. Recall Econ101: there is no free lunch.
【在 O******e 的大作中提到】 : 临床应用只是咱们做研究的目的之一。这个基本事实一万年也不会变。 : : case
【在 d***d 的大作中提到】 : : Claiming that doing science is for the sake of science or curiosity is : indeed very honorable and glorious, but honestly, can be very pretentious, : too. : Let's face it: where do we receive our research funding, and what are the : funding agencies' expectations? Regardless of whether it's tax payers' money : or some private foundation, eventually the beneficiaries would like to see : something tangible in return. Recall Econ101: there is no free lunch.
L*s
23 楼
怎么觉得我是奔大V的节奏...
【在 e*****e 的大作中提到】 : 李老师您好!您亲自回我的帖子我很荣幸!
d*d
24 楼
This is biology board and we are talking about research in the biological field, funded mostly by NIH and other medical foundations. These beneficiaries have a common mission to "uncover new knowledge that will lead to better health for everyone", a.k.a., clinical applications. Science for the sake of curiosity is, unfortunately, not their mission, and will be frowned upon if put into a grant proposal. The politically correct way to write an NIH grant proposal is to relate your research to some kind of disease, and more recently, translational research. Math and theoretical physics, on the other hand, get the majority of their funding from NSF, which states in its mission "To promote the progress of science". So there's nothing wrong or hypocritical for them to claim ' science for the sake of science'. Simply put: we get paid by our funding agency and therefore have to abide by their rules. Like it or not, you have to live with it.
【在 y**********n 的大作中提到】 : 照你这么说那些做数学,理论物理的是不是对science的亵渎? : : money : see
l*g
25 楼
你不能自抬轿子 假波呢,我俩给抬抬
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】 : 怎么觉得我是奔大V的节奏...
k*o
26 楼
"We went through the paper line by line, figure by figure," said Begley. "I explained that we re-did their experiment 50 times and never got their result. He said they'd done it six times and got this result once, but put it in the paper because it made the best story. It's very disillusioning." 这人居然有脸当面那样说