今年San Diego ASN conference找hotel roommate - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Biology - 生物学

今年San Diego ASN conference找hotel roommate

今年San Diego ASN conference找hotel roommate# Biology - 生物学

n*82012-08-16 07:08

1 楼

My R21 wasn't discussed-:(. However I saw JIT in my ERA COMMONS account.
Weird. An error? What percentage is discussed now at a cancer study section?
Thanks!

p*o2012-08-16 07:08

2 楼

自己卖房子，有一个buyer过来，价格谈定，问他贷款有没有问题，他说他是cash买，
这年月哪有这么有钱的人？这里面有没有什么猫腻？明天打电话问问我的lawyer

H*r2012-08-16 07:08

3 楼

【以下文字转载自 Returnee 讨论区】
发信人: meilefu (我好穷啊。。。), 信区: Returnee
标题: 一则招聘广告
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Aug 16 00:08:40 2010, 美东)
看附件！！

E*y2012-08-16 07:08

4 楼

如果两个人都不愿意变傻，都精明，都什么事弄个究竟。搞个明白，那就准备分手吧。
“不要征服对方”，这是夫妻最重要的问题。征服，是夫妻之间经常发生的事情，
谈论谁是对的，追究谁是错的；讨论谁伤害了谁，谁过分了。这些，都是大忌。
好夫妻，永远都在相互装傻，装瞎，其实就是护短。能够护短的，才是真爱。
爱就别为难对方，别挑剔对方，别指责对方，傻傻地一路相伴。傻，是因为已经决
定了，认定了，就没有什么需要再了解，再知道，再改进，再完善的。
有进步，接受；没有，也接受。爱，就在那里。
一辈子，能够有一个人，好好相爱，多美啊。别去破坏，多大的事情都不值得你去
破坏。不要在相爱的人身上动小聪明，动你的精明！要就动你的心。
永远不对爱人说重话，永远不去做破坏气氛和心情的事。男人有脾气正常，但男人
的脾气可以对天发对地发对老板发，却不可以对老婆发。
因为不管你心情好坏，别人都可以转身离开，却只有爱人要陪着你，陪你度过心灰
意冷，度过意气风发。
这一生你会得到很多失去很多，而陪你到最后的人却只有一个。天大地大，都不如身边
的女人大。

d*02012-08-16 07:08

5 楼

用着用着，就死在那里了。
把鸡箱打开，把灰尘吹掉就好了。不知道原因是啥。
用的是这个
Dust Destroyer, 7 oz., 2/pack

J*X2012-08-16 07:08

6 楼

我订了会议指定的酒店，两张床的房间，在班车路线上。
想找人（男性）share，费用平分，约$112/day。
有意者请站内短信联系。
另外，如果有更合适的版面发这类广告，也请告知，谢谢！

n*g2012-08-16 07:08

7 楼

JIT indicates your proposal is not at the bottom.

y*u2012-08-16 07:08

8 楼

只要他给你开official check就可以了，不要拿cash

【在 p***o 的大作中提到】

: 自己卖房子，有一个buyer过来，价格谈定，问他贷款有没有问题，他说他是cash买，
: 这年月哪有这么有钱的人？这里面有没有什么猫腻？明天打电话问问我的lawyer

H*72012-08-16 07:08

9 楼

看来来你做法事的道士未必信道教

J*X2012-08-16 07:08

10 楼

n*82012-08-16 07:08

11 楼

自己顶一下。 I meant Just In Time request. I looked up JIT policy. The
request was automatically sent to any proposal with an impact score <40. But
mine is undiscussed, so no impact score, I assume. Waiting for the summary.

b*d2012-08-16 07:08

12 楼

加州这边Cash买房子多着呢。

【在 p***o 的大作中提到】

l*a2012-08-16 07:08

13 楼

不应该是学化学的优先么？

b*d2012-08-16 07:08

14 楼

给你看个相似例子
https://writedit.wordpress.com/about/nih-paylines-resources/discussion-nih-
scorespaylinespolicypeer-review/

Emaderton3 said
July 13, 2015 @ 12:53 pm
I submitted a new R01 that was not discussed but got the automated JIT
request. I know that this JIT request does not mean anything, but I thought
the policy was to automatically have it in eRA Commons with priority scores
of 40 or better. (My reviewer criteria scores were mostly in the 2-4 range
except one 5 and one 6.)
Reply
writedit said
July 13, 2015 @ 2:49 pm
The link is opened on eRA Commons for all applications, and I have heard
of others receiving automated JIT emails for >40/unscored applications, but
I cannot explain why (just remind them to ignore it).

But
summary.

【在 n******8 的大作中提到】

: 自己顶一下。 I meant Just In Time request. I looked up JIT policy. The
: request was automatically sent to any proposal with an impact score <40. But
: mine is undiscussed, so no impact score, I assume. Waiting for the summary.

w*y2012-08-16 07:08

15 楼

nod

p*o2012-08-16 07:08

16 楼

这个以前不是上海什么静安寺还是什么似招和尚的要求嘛? 再说了, 道士的私生活公
司干预不干预又没啥区别, 本来就不需要戒荤戒色戒酒...

n*82012-08-16 07:08

17 楼

brihand, many thanks! somewhat comforting.

p*o2012-08-16 07:08

18 楼

the other buyer would like to have higher price with lease-to-purchase, any
one has experience on it. I talked with my lawyer, he seems ok with it but
we are going to move to another state, we are kind of worry how to deal the
trouble if the guy does not pay the rent.

o*e2012-08-16 07:08

19 楼

it does not mean anything... move on.

C*K2012-08-16 07:08

20 楼

cash is king

s*y2012-08-16 07:08

21 楼

除非是PO 找你要的，否则没有意义。

section?

【在 n******8 的大作中提到】

: My R21 wasn't discussed-:(. However I saw JIT in my ERA COMMONS account.
: Weird. An error? What percentage is discussed now at a cancer study section?
: Thanks!

f*i2012-08-16 07:08

22 楼

ask for proof of funds

【在 p***o 的大作中提到】

n*82012-08-16 07:08

23 楼

Just received the critiques. Surprised how polar three reviewers can be. Do
agree with some of the critiques.
CRITIQUE 1:
Significance: 4 Investigator(s): 3 Innovation: 5 Approach: 6 Environment: 3
CRITIQUE 2:
Significance: 2 Investigator(s): 1 Innovation: 2 Approach: 2 Environment: 1
CRITIQUE 3:
Significance: 5 Investigator(s): 5 Innovation: 4 Approach: 7 Environment: 4
wish i could figure who #3 were and avoid him/her in the future.

b*d2012-08-16 07:08

24 楼

1. approach打得有些低.以前看过个blog说最后的那个分和approach的分关联相对最大.
https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2011/03/08/overall-impact-and-criterion-scores/

Do
3
1
4

【在 n******8 的大作中提到】

: Just received the critiques. Surprised how polar three reviewers can be. Do
: agree with some of the critiques.
: CRITIQUE 1:
: Significance: 4 Investigator(s): 3 Innovation: 5 Approach: 6 Environment: 3
: CRITIQUE 2:
: Significance: 2 Investigator(s): 1 Innovation: 2 Approach: 2 Environment: 1
: CRITIQUE 3:
: Significance: 5 Investigator(s): 5 Innovation: 4 Approach: 7 Environment: 4
: wish i could figure who #3 were and avoid him/her in the future.