Former Harvard Postdoc Found Guilty of Misconduct# Biology - 生物学
f*8
1 楼
我是在读的phD，还有2年左右毕业，编程很差，论文又不行，但是还是想找工作。。。
我肯定不能找faculty的工作，就我这样的不行。
在毕业之前，我应该怎么提高自己的水平呢？
多谢指教！
我肯定不能找faculty的工作，就我这样的不行。
在毕业之前，我应该怎么提高自己的水平呢？
多谢指教！
a*0
2 楼
MORTGAGE rate相同，为何APR会有很大的差别？是因为CLOSING COST的问题，还是各个
银行的算法不一样导致的呢？
银行的算法不一样导致的呢？
k*n
3 楼
这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
g*0
4 楼
09/04/2012 Melissa Lee Phillips
Former Harvard postdoc Shane Mayack reaches a settlement with the ORI but
maintains that the duplication of flow cytometry images was an error, not
fabrication.
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
while working in the Joslin Diabetes Center lab of high-profile stem cell
biologist Amy Wagers.
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
while working in the Joslin Diabetes Center lab of high-profile stem cell
biologist Amy Wagers. Source: IdeaConnection
On August 28, the ORI posted a notice to the Federal Register indicating
final action has been taken in the case, which lasted for two years and
involved the retraction of two papers. Mayack has agreed to a voluntary
settlement surrounding the case, although she "neither admits nor denies ORI
's finding of research misconduct."
In August 2010, Wagers told Nature editors she had noticed a problem with
her lab's January 2010 Nature paper "Systemic signals regulate ageing and
rejuvenation of blood stem cell niches," which claimed that age-related
changes in blood stem cells might be reversible (1). Mayack, who was the
first author on that paper, used a flow cytometry plot that appeared
identical to one in a 2008 Blood paper by Mayack and Wagers (2), but it was
used to represent a different experiment with different results.
A retraction notice appeared in Nature in October 2011, but Mayack refused
to sign it and maintained that the results were valid. In the same month,
Wagers also published a statement of concern in Blood for the 2008 paper, "
Osteolineage niche cells initiate hematopoietic stem cell mobilization."
That paper was retracted in late 2011, also without Mayack's signature.
In a 2011 guest post on the blog Retraction Watch, Mayack admitted to
mishandling data—publishing the same plots but with different labels and
results—but said that it was the result of mistakes in data retrieval. "
Errors, not fabrications, were made in assembling figures for these
manuscripts," she wrote. "I am likely the one who made these errors."
However, ORI's final report concludes that Mayack not only duplicated eight
flow cytometry images but also "falsely represented" two images of bone
nodules, by copying them from other authors' unrelated publications.
Mayack maintains that the errors were unintentional, according to a
statement through her lawyer that was posted on Retraction Watch this week:
"These were mistakes in representation and presentation of the data, as
corroborated by ORI’s findings of ‘falsely presented,' and were not due to
fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism of scientific results."
Wagers said in an email that she has "nothing to add to the ORI conclusions,
other than I am glad the matter is concluded."
ORI's notice specifies that the settlement does not constitute admission of
liability by Mayack but notes that she has voluntarily agreed to be
supervised in any federally funded research that she conducts during the
next three years and that she will not serve in any advisory capacity to
federally funded research for that time period as well.
References
Mayack, S. R., J. L. Shadrach, F. S. Kim, and A. J. Wagers. 2010. Systemic
signals regulate ageing and rejuvenation of blood stem cell niches. Nature
463(7280):495-500.
Mayack, S. R., and A. J. Wagers. 2008. Osteolineage niche cells initiate
hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Blood 112(3):519-531.
Former Harvard postdoc Shane Mayack reaches a settlement with the ORI but
maintains that the duplication of flow cytometry images was an error, not
fabrication.
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
while working in the Joslin Diabetes Center lab of high-profile stem cell
biologist Amy Wagers.
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
while working in the Joslin Diabetes Center lab of high-profile stem cell
biologist Amy Wagers. Source: IdeaConnection
On August 28, the ORI posted a notice to the Federal Register indicating
final action has been taken in the case, which lasted for two years and
involved the retraction of two papers. Mayack has agreed to a voluntary
settlement surrounding the case, although she "neither admits nor denies ORI
's finding of research misconduct."
In August 2010, Wagers told Nature editors she had noticed a problem with
her lab's January 2010 Nature paper "Systemic signals regulate ageing and
rejuvenation of blood stem cell niches," which claimed that age-related
changes in blood stem cells might be reversible (1). Mayack, who was the
first author on that paper, used a flow cytometry plot that appeared
identical to one in a 2008 Blood paper by Mayack and Wagers (2), but it was
used to represent a different experiment with different results.
A retraction notice appeared in Nature in October 2011, but Mayack refused
to sign it and maintained that the results were valid. In the same month,
Wagers also published a statement of concern in Blood for the 2008 paper, "
Osteolineage niche cells initiate hematopoietic stem cell mobilization."
That paper was retracted in late 2011, also without Mayack's signature.
In a 2011 guest post on the blog Retraction Watch, Mayack admitted to
mishandling data—publishing the same plots but with different labels and
results—but said that it was the result of mistakes in data retrieval. "
Errors, not fabrications, were made in assembling figures for these
manuscripts," she wrote. "I am likely the one who made these errors."
However, ORI's final report concludes that Mayack not only duplicated eight
flow cytometry images but also "falsely represented" two images of bone
nodules, by copying them from other authors' unrelated publications.
Mayack maintains that the errors were unintentional, according to a
statement through her lawyer that was posted on Retraction Watch this week:
"These were mistakes in representation and presentation of the data, as
corroborated by ORI’s findings of ‘falsely presented,' and were not due to
fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism of scientific results."
Wagers said in an email that she has "nothing to add to the ORI conclusions,
other than I am glad the matter is concluded."
ORI's notice specifies that the settlement does not constitute admission of
liability by Mayack but notes that she has voluntarily agreed to be
supervised in any federally funded research that she conducts during the
next three years and that she will not serve in any advisory capacity to
federally funded research for that time period as well.
References
Mayack, S. R., J. L. Shadrach, F. S. Kim, and A. J. Wagers. 2010. Systemic
signals regulate ageing and rejuvenation of blood stem cell niches. Nature
463(7280):495-500.
Mayack, S. R., and A. J. Wagers. 2008. Osteolineage niche cells initiate
hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Blood 112(3):519-531.
b*n
5 楼
only way to learn programming is to program. u can participate open source
projects, the bigger project the better. or even better, open one project
of ur own that has thousands lines of code...
【在 f***8 的大作中提到】
: 我是在读的phD，还有2年左右毕业，编程很差，论文又不行，但是还是想找工作。。。
: 我肯定不能找faculty的工作，就我这样的不行。
: 在毕业之前，我应该怎么提高自己的水平呢？
: 多谢指教！
projects, the bigger project the better. or even better, open one project
of ur own that has thousands lines of code...
【在 f***8 的大作中提到】
: 我是在读的phD，还有2年左右毕业，编程很差，论文又不行，但是还是想找工作。。。
: 我肯定不能找faculty的工作，就我这样的不行。
: 在毕业之前，我应该怎么提高自己的水平呢？
: 多谢指教！
T*U
6 楼
closing cost and point
s*d
7 楼
不让你用facetime，哈哈。
c*r
8 楼
Amy Wager实验室。。。。
据说在小领域里面名声已经毁了？？
据说在小领域里面名声已经毁了？？
l*3
9 楼
多学习编程
a*0
10 楼
TTU,你说的POINT，是做MORTGAGE时买的那个0.5/1的POINT么？
所以说挑银行的时候，如果POINT都是0,挑个RATE & APR都低的就对了？
多谢！多谢！
所以说挑银行的时候，如果POINT都是0,挑个RATE & APR都低的就对了？
多谢！多谢！
u*a
11 楼
站在用户的立场, 很多软件不是ios7用不了...
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
w*r
12 楼
在哈佛照样promote,
照样发文章
照样发文章
J*r
13 楼
re
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
: only way to learn programming is to program. u can participate open source
: projects, the bigger project the better. or even better, open one project
: of ur own that has thousands lines of code...
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
: only way to learn programming is to program. u can participate open source
: projects, the bigger project the better. or even better, open one project
: of ur own that has thousands lines of code...
b*d
14 楼
还要看Closing Cost的区别。
【在 a*********0 的大作中提到】
: TTU,你说的POINT，是做MORTGAGE时买的那个0.5/1的POINT么？
: 所以说挑银行的时候，如果POINT都是0,挑个RATE & APR都低的就对了？
: 多谢！多谢！
【在 a*********0 的大作中提到】
: TTU,你说的POINT，是做MORTGAGE时买的那个0.5/1的POINT么？
: 所以说挑银行的时候，如果POINT都是0,挑个RATE & APR都低的就对了？
: 多谢！多谢！
c*h
15 楼
iphone都升了
越狱的ipad没升，留着游戏作弊
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
越狱的ipad没升，留着游戏作弊
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
T*i
16 楼
刑不上（有背景的）PI。
薄厚就是苦逼的命。有好处大头是PI的，有坏事大头是薄厚的。
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 在哈佛照样promote,
: 照样发文章
薄厚就是苦逼的命。有好处大头是PI的，有坏事大头是薄厚的。
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 在哈佛照样promote,
: 照样发文章
x*p
17 楼
Try to learn more about Java programming, then come to me and I can
guarantee you a job.
guarantee you a job.
o*n
18 楼
为什么不升？
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
F*Q
19 楼
牛屎堆里的事情？
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 在哈佛照样promote,
: 照样发文章
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 在哈佛照样promote,
: 照样发文章
m*s
20 楼
不要相信统计。
自己用的好，就好。
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
自己用的好，就好。
【在 k******n 的大作中提到】
: 这是苹果的统计，我表示怀疑啊
: 明明6用的好好的，还更流畅，还能越狱，站在用户的立场干嘛要升啊？
F*Q
21 楼
我前面说过，学术圈就是奴隶社会和封建社会的结合体。
【在 T****i 的大作中提到】
: 刑不上（有背景的）PI。
: 薄厚就是苦逼的命。有好处大头是PI的，有坏事大头是薄厚的。
【在 T****i 的大作中提到】
: 刑不上（有背景的）PI。
: 薄厚就是苦逼的命。有好处大头是PI的，有坏事大头是薄厚的。
b*1
22 楼
iOS 6 pass by.
a*n
23 楼
duplication of an image 这种假也太没有技术含量了
稍微勤奋一点的造假的根本就查不出，要不然生物界就不会有那么多似是而非的data了
【在 g********0 的大作中提到】
: 09/04/2012 Melissa Lee Phillips
: Former Harvard postdoc Shane Mayack reaches a settlement with the ORI but
: maintains that the duplication of flow cytometry images was an error, not
: fabrication.
: The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
: Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
: while working in the Joslin Diabetes Center lab of high-profile stem cell
: biologist Amy Wagers.
: The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
: Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
稍微勤奋一点的造假的根本就查不出，要不然生物界就不会有那么多似是而非的data了
【在 g********0 的大作中提到】
: 09/04/2012 Melissa Lee Phillips
: Former Harvard postdoc Shane Mayack reaches a settlement with the ORI but
: maintains that the duplication of flow cytometry images was an error, not
: fabrication.
: The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
: Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
: while working in the Joslin Diabetes Center lab of high-profile stem cell
: biologist Amy Wagers.
: The U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has concluded that former
: Harvard postdoctoral fellow Shane Mayack engaged in research misconduct
f*g
24 楼
D*a
25 楼
图片盗用PI也可以无罪？？擦，TA名字在paper上面是干嘛用的。
你要说直接从实验伪造结果PI很难控制也就罢了，赤裸裸的搬PI以前签名发表的paper
图片，PI无罪的理由是神马？？？
你要说直接从实验伪造结果PI很难控制也就罢了，赤裸裸的搬PI以前签名发表的paper
图片，PI无罪的理由是神马？？？
T*i
26 楼
她上面有人：）
paper
【在 D*a 的大作中提到】
: 图片盗用PI也可以无罪？？擦，TA名字在paper上面是干嘛用的。
: 你要说直接从实验伪造结果PI很难控制也就罢了，赤裸裸的搬PI以前签名发表的paper
: 图片，PI无罪的理由是神马？？？
paper
【在 D*a 的大作中提到】
: 图片盗用PI也可以无罪？？擦，TA名字在paper上面是干嘛用的。
: 你要说直接从实验伪造结果PI很难控制也就罢了，赤裸裸的搬PI以前签名发表的paper
: 图片，PI无罪的理由是神马？？？
H*e
27 楼
My previous post:
I always had problem with Amy's work, even her postdoctoral's work in that
big name lab. She is very aggressive which makes me sick. She had no shame
draw big conclusion with a small data and cannot take the 2nd voice. In
these cases, it is obvious that these data fit her big dream. So she even
did not noticed the data itself.
I remember that my mentor even remember every molecular weight marker that I
labelled. As the PI, Amy is responsible for these misconduct for sure.
I always had problem with Amy's work, even her postdoctoral's work in that
big name lab. She is very aggressive which makes me sick. She had no shame
draw big conclusion with a small data and cannot take the 2nd voice. In
these cases, it is obvious that these data fit her big dream. So she even
did not noticed the data itself.
I remember that my mentor even remember every molecular weight marker that I
labelled. As the PI, Amy is responsible for these misconduct for sure.
相关阅读
请问用过fibronectin的人SBIG: ChannelsRe: 有一段序列,想知道里面有哪些binding site or eleme?Re: orthologwuwu...被训了!!Re: 谁能解释一下"linkage disequilibrium"Re: 1st paper --random journal clubJournal club this weekRe: 谁能给写个抑癌基因的小综述？Re: HHMI professors or Investigators钓鱼的领悟--读这几天对学生物的讨论有感first topicRe: 这个版完了SBIG: ChannelsRe: 怎么查专利SBIG: ChannelsRe: Do we really care about noise?post-doc fellowship -prepare applicationRe: totalRNA isolation.已经不错了 Re: [转载] 觉得老板做的不太对头，大家评评