l*1
2 楼
奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
09/05/2012
Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
for inappropriate images
with 6 comments
The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
retracted.
Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
Robert J. White:
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article
Withdrawal http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors.
Our paper reported that overexpression of tRNAiMet can promote cell
proliferation and transformation. It has now become clear that images in
several figures are duplications that do not represent the experiments
described in the legends. Although we remain convinced that tRNAiMet can
have proliferative and oncogenic effects based on subsequent work in our lab
and others, given these issues with the validity of the figures, we believe
the most appropriate course of action is to retract the paper. We deeply
regret this circumstance and apologize to the community. The first author, L
.M., has not agreed to this Retraction.
We wanted to know whether there had been an investigation, and why Marshall
had declined to sign the notice. Professor Karen Vousden, director of the
Beatson Institute, tells Retraction Watch:
We launched an investigation into this matter and we’re unable to comment
further until the investigation is complete. All authors were invited to
sign the retraction notice.
Senior author Robert White told us he is out on sick leave.
We’ve tried to reach Marshall, now until July a post-doctoral fellow at the
University of Alberta in Calgary, for comment, and will update with
anything we learn.
The Cell paper has been cited 84 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s
Web of Knowledge.
Second-to-last paragraph updated 5 p.m. Eastern, 9/10/12, with new
information about when Marshall’s Calgary postdoc ended.
link:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/glasgows-beatso
09/05/2012
Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
for inappropriate images
with 6 comments
The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
retracted.
Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
Robert J. White:
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article
Withdrawal http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors.
Our paper reported that overexpression of tRNAiMet can promote cell
proliferation and transformation. It has now become clear that images in
several figures are duplications that do not represent the experiments
described in the legends. Although we remain convinced that tRNAiMet can
have proliferative and oncogenic effects based on subsequent work in our lab
and others, given these issues with the validity of the figures, we believe
the most appropriate course of action is to retract the paper. We deeply
regret this circumstance and apologize to the community. The first author, L
.M., has not agreed to this Retraction.
We wanted to know whether there had been an investigation, and why Marshall
had declined to sign the notice. Professor Karen Vousden, director of the
Beatson Institute, tells Retraction Watch:
We launched an investigation into this matter and we’re unable to comment
further until the investigation is complete. All authors were invited to
sign the retraction notice.
Senior author Robert White told us he is out on sick leave.
We’ve tried to reach Marshall, now until July a post-doctoral fellow at the
University of Alberta in Calgary, for comment, and will update with
anything we learn.
The Cell paper has been cited 84 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s
Web of Knowledge.
Second-to-last paragraph updated 5 p.m. Eastern, 9/10/12, with new
information about when Marshall’s Calgary postdoc ended.
link:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/glasgows-beatso
l*1
3 楼
Elsevier dot com direct link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867408002
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867408002
D*a
4 楼
每次看到Although we remain convinced that blablabla就特别想笑，哈哈
08年的paper，citation该计入的都计入了，对cell没影响啊。
08年的paper，citation该计入的都计入了，对cell没影响啊。
G*y
5 楼
The comment is awesome:
"Inappropriate images”…I was hoping for at least an R-rated issue of Cell
…"
retraction
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: 奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
: 09/05/2012
: Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
: for inappropriate images
: with 6 comments
: The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
: into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
: retracted.
: Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
: Robert J. White:
"Inappropriate images”…I was hoping for at least an R-rated issue of Cell
…"
retraction
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: 奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
: 09/05/2012
: Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
: for inappropriate images
: with 6 comments
: The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
: into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
: retracted.
: Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
: Robert J. White:
n*2
6 楼
尼玛啊~啊~啊
天下还有我这么不幸的人吗？
天下还有我这么不幸的人吗？
m*p
7 楼
repeat成功了还是失败了？
【在 n******2 的大作中提到】
: 尼玛啊~啊~啊
: 天下还有我这么不幸的人吗？
【在 n******2 的大作中提到】
: 尼玛啊~啊~啊
: 天下还有我这么不幸的人吗？
相关阅读
什么supplements可以促进悬浮细胞生长？NIH招人没有确保招聘公平的机制？也请教高考志愿填报的问题联邦劳工统计局的报告BGI的定位到底是什么？为什么千老看上去都那么萎缩？？？诱导型的cripsr-cas9baozi求paperpaper help，有包子奉上数篇医学类审稿机会，涉及骨科，消化等方向，影响因子5.【求审稿机会】biophysis方向想去清华药学系的看这里为啥学生物的没人转professional school呢？paper helps!生物是要黑的，而且应该黑，看看我的例子就知道生物类研究生出现男生大量灭绝和护士学校化的现象『出租』波士顿west roxbury, 阳光好房出租。 (转载)培养箱污染？求助！小鼠胚胎期计算 半天怎么来的Paper help!