l*1
2 楼
奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
09/05/2012
Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
for inappropriate images
with 6 comments
The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
retracted.
Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
Robert J. White:
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article
Withdrawal http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors.
Our paper reported that overexpression of tRNAiMet can promote cell
proliferation and transformation. It has now become clear that images in
several figures are duplications that do not represent the experiments
described in the legends. Although we remain convinced that tRNAiMet can
have proliferative and oncogenic effects based on subsequent work in our lab
and others, given these issues with the validity of the figures, we believe
the most appropriate course of action is to retract the paper. We deeply
regret this circumstance and apologize to the community. The first author, L
.M., has not agreed to this Retraction.
We wanted to know whether there had been an investigation, and why Marshall
had declined to sign the notice. Professor Karen Vousden, director of the
Beatson Institute, tells Retraction Watch:
We launched an investigation into this matter and we’re unable to comment
further until the investigation is complete. All authors were invited to
sign the retraction notice.
Senior author Robert White told us he is out on sick leave.
We’ve tried to reach Marshall, now until July a post-doctoral fellow at the
University of Alberta in Calgary, for comment, and will update with
anything we learn.
The Cell paper has been cited 84 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s
Web of Knowledge.
Second-to-last paragraph updated 5 p.m. Eastern, 9/10/12, with new
information about when Marshall’s Calgary postdoc ended.
link:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/glasgows-beatso
09/05/2012
Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
for inappropriate images
with 6 comments
The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
retracted.
Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
Robert J. White:
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article
Withdrawal http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors.
Our paper reported that overexpression of tRNAiMet can promote cell
proliferation and transformation. It has now become clear that images in
several figures are duplications that do not represent the experiments
described in the legends. Although we remain convinced that tRNAiMet can
have proliferative and oncogenic effects based on subsequent work in our lab
and others, given these issues with the validity of the figures, we believe
the most appropriate course of action is to retract the paper. We deeply
regret this circumstance and apologize to the community. The first author, L
.M., has not agreed to this Retraction.
We wanted to know whether there had been an investigation, and why Marshall
had declined to sign the notice. Professor Karen Vousden, director of the
Beatson Institute, tells Retraction Watch:
We launched an investigation into this matter and we’re unable to comment
further until the investigation is complete. All authors were invited to
sign the retraction notice.
Senior author Robert White told us he is out on sick leave.
We’ve tried to reach Marshall, now until July a post-doctoral fellow at the
University of Alberta in Calgary, for comment, and will update with
anything we learn.
The Cell paper has been cited 84 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s
Web of Knowledge.
Second-to-last paragraph updated 5 p.m. Eastern, 9/10/12, with new
information about when Marshall’s Calgary postdoc ended.
link:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/glasgows-beatso
l*1
3 楼
Elsevier dot com direct link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867408002
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867408002
D*a
4 楼
每次看到Although we remain convinced that blablabla就特别想笑,哈哈
08年的paper,citation该计入的都计入了,对cell没影响啊。
08年的paper,citation该计入的都计入了,对cell没影响啊。
G*y
5 楼
The comment is awesome:
"Inappropriate images”…I was hoping for at least an R-rated issue of Cell
…"
retraction
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: 奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
: 09/05/2012
: Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
: for inappropriate images
: with 6 comments
: The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
: into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
: retracted.
: Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
: Robert J. White:
"Inappropriate images”…I was hoping for at least an R-rated issue of Cell
…"
retraction
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: 奇了 怪了 没啥人曝这条吗 快一周了 哈
: 09/05/2012
: Glasgow’s Beatson Institute investigating circumstances of Cell retraction
: for inappropriate images
: with 6 comments
: The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Glasgow, Scotland is looking
: into how inappropriate images ended up in a Cell paper that has just been
: retracted.
: Here’s the notice for the paper by Lynne Marshall, Niall S. Kenneth, and
: Robert J. White:
n*2
6 楼
尼玛啊~啊~啊
天下还有我这么不幸的人吗?
天下还有我这么不幸的人吗?
相关阅读
请大家客观给些建议,坚持还是转行?发现性的短文章有合适的杂志推荐吗SNP 分析请教包子求文献[有链接]关于转基因美国人也是用脚投票的湾区industry job opportunity-in vivo cardiovascular 方向据了ACS的主编的稿子以后 (转载)求文献一篇学生物又怎样,有中医粉,神棍请教: 能否把E. coli glycerol stock暂时放在-20度放1,2天?学生物的有没有反对转基因的?paper help: PMID21790905ZZ: 博后,年薪睡前9万刀其实重点是怎么挑哪些转基因能吃审稿总审review的文章算啥情况?非老板但是是院士的推荐信申faculty有用没?高人推荐一个好的基因表达的网站呗?要不要转行?来瞻仰一下转基因导致老鼠得癌的文章(看看comments) (转载)着急!!单细胞长着长着就停了,有什么办法?