g*3
2 楼
eb1a 140 pp
RD: Sep/22
SLUD: Oct/05
SLUD: Oct/06
NOID MAIL RD: Oct/08
Part I) 3 Criteria to be met
Claimed 4: 2 accepted; 2 rejected.
1) reviewer: accepted.
2) authorship: accepted.
3) award: rejected,
I claimed a 部级的科技进步奖 and put a lot of efforts to describe its
criteria and the significances of the research that led to this award. To
further prove that I have been playing a leading role in the research I also
mentioned that due to the significances of my research I was awarded "the
best researcher award" from 部研究院(局级)。because I was not intent to
claim this as the award to meet the uscis' criterion I did not give any
details for the best researcher award.In the NOID letter, the director
states: "the beneficiary did not submit any supporting documentation to
demonstrate that the best researcher award is a lesser nationally or
internationally recognized award for excellence in the field, therefore the
beneficiary has not met this criterion". My lord, I spent 2 pages to
describe the 部级的科技进步奖 he did not even mention it here but used the
best researcher award as the reason to reject this claim. I know I made
mistake to mention the best research award but now what I should I do to get
the director's attention to the other award that is what I intent to claim.
4) contribution: rejected. the beneficiary should be able to show how the
field has changed as a result of his accomplishments, how the beneficiary's
techniques have been adopted in the fields.It is best demonstrated by
preexisting, independent and objective evidence. The record contains no
evidence that the work is of major significance to the field outside of his
immediate circle of collaborators and colleagues. Letters of support alone
are not sufficient to meet this criterion.
II) Totality
He mentioned that I got phd in 2008 and only worked for a short time. The
totality criterion has not met. the director did not mention that I have
nearly 10 years experiences in China, which is very clear in the petition
letter and supporting docs.
RD: Sep/22
SLUD: Oct/05
SLUD: Oct/06
NOID MAIL RD: Oct/08
Part I) 3 Criteria to be met
Claimed 4: 2 accepted; 2 rejected.
1) reviewer: accepted.
2) authorship: accepted.
3) award: rejected,
I claimed a 部级的科技进步奖 and put a lot of efforts to describe its
criteria and the significances of the research that led to this award. To
further prove that I have been playing a leading role in the research I also
mentioned that due to the significances of my research I was awarded "the
best researcher award" from 部研究院(局级)。because I was not intent to
claim this as the award to meet the uscis' criterion I did not give any
details for the best researcher award.In the NOID letter, the director
states: "the beneficiary did not submit any supporting documentation to
demonstrate that the best researcher award is a lesser nationally or
internationally recognized award for excellence in the field, therefore the
beneficiary has not met this criterion". My lord, I spent 2 pages to
describe the 部级的科技进步奖 he did not even mention it here but used the
best researcher award as the reason to reject this claim. I know I made
mistake to mention the best research award but now what I should I do to get
the director's attention to the other award that is what I intent to claim.
4) contribution: rejected. the beneficiary should be able to show how the
field has changed as a result of his accomplishments, how the beneficiary's
techniques have been adopted in the fields.It is best demonstrated by
preexisting, independent and objective evidence. The record contains no
evidence that the work is of major significance to the field outside of his
immediate circle of collaborators and colleagues. Letters of support alone
are not sufficient to meet this criterion.
II) Totality
He mentioned that I got phd in 2008 and only worked for a short time. The
totality criterion has not met. the director did not mention that I have
nearly 10 years experiences in China, which is very clear in the petition
letter and supporting docs.
f*a
3 楼
基本上research associate的职位都只要求master, 加上若干年经验,这种情况fresh
phd 算不算 overqualify 呢?
我知道scientist 是给有经验的phd, research associate 是不是也只考虑有经验的
master? 那fresh phd 岂不一点活路都没有
phd 算不算 overqualify 呢?
我知道scientist 是给有经验的phd, research associate 是不是也只考虑有经验的
master? 那fresh phd 岂不一点活路都没有
z*0
4 楼
做饮料的那个吗?
b*M
5 楼
answer and explain each question as you mentined here. You need have
confidence to argue that you are on the top of 5% in your field.
confidence to argue that you are on the top of 5% in your field.
m*c
8 楼
这个2008年拿phd似乎有点麻烦啊?该怎么办?
y*e
12 楼
你啥背景啊,多少paper,多少citation啊
eb1a 140 pp
RD: Sep/22
SLUD: Oct/05
SLUD: Oct/06
NOID MAIL RD: Oct/08
Part I) 3 Criteria to be met
Claimed 4: 2 accepted; 2 rejected.
1) reviewer: accepted.
2) authorship: accepted.
3) award: rejected,
I claimed a 部级的科技进步奖 and put a lot of efforts to describe its
criteria and the significances of the research that led to this award. To
further prove that I have been playing a leading role in the research I also
mentioned that due to the significances of my research I was awarded "the
best researcher award" from 部研究院(局级)。because I was not intent to
claim this as the award to meet the uscis' criterion I did not give any
details for the best researcher award.In the NOID letter, the director
states: "the beneficiary did not submit any supporting documentation to
demonstrate that the best researcher award is a lesser nationally or
internationally recognized award for excellence in the field, therefore the
beneficiary has not met this criterion". My lord, I spent 2 pages to
describe the 部级的科技进步奖 he did not even mention it here but used the
best researcher award as the reason to reject this claim. I know I made
mistake to mention the best research award but now what I should I do to get
the director's attention to the other award that is what I intent to claim.
4) contribution: rejected. the beneficiary should be able to show how the
field has changed as a result of his accomplishments, how the beneficiary's
techniques have been adopted in the fields.It is best demonstrated by
preexisting, independent and objective evidence. The record contains no
evidence that the work is of major significance to the field outside of his
immediate circle of collaborators and colleagues. Letters of support alone
are not sufficient to meet this criterion.
II) Totality
He mentioned that I got phd in 2008 and only worked for a short time. The
totality criterion has not met. the director did not mention that I have
nearly 10 years experiences in China, which is very clear in the petition
letter and supporting docs.
【在 g*****3 的大作中提到】
: eb1a 140 pp
: RD: Sep/22
: SLUD: Oct/05
: SLUD: Oct/06
: NOID MAIL RD: Oct/08
: Part I) 3 Criteria to be met
: Claimed 4: 2 accepted; 2 rejected.
: 1) reviewer: accepted.
: 2) authorship: accepted.
: 3) award: rejected,
eb1a 140 pp
RD: Sep/22
SLUD: Oct/05
SLUD: Oct/06
NOID MAIL RD: Oct/08
Part I) 3 Criteria to be met
Claimed 4: 2 accepted; 2 rejected.
1) reviewer: accepted.
2) authorship: accepted.
3) award: rejected,
I claimed a 部级的科技进步奖 and put a lot of efforts to describe its
criteria and the significances of the research that led to this award. To
further prove that I have been playing a leading role in the research I also
mentioned that due to the significances of my research I was awarded "the
best researcher award" from 部研究院(局级)。because I was not intent to
claim this as the award to meet the uscis' criterion I did not give any
details for the best researcher award.In the NOID letter, the director
states: "the beneficiary did not submit any supporting documentation to
demonstrate that the best researcher award is a lesser nationally or
internationally recognized award for excellence in the field, therefore the
beneficiary has not met this criterion". My lord, I spent 2 pages to
describe the 部级的科技进步奖 he did not even mention it here but used the
best researcher award as the reason to reject this claim. I know I made
mistake to mention the best research award but now what I should I do to get
the director's attention to the other award that is what I intent to claim.
4) contribution: rejected. the beneficiary should be able to show how the
field has changed as a result of his accomplishments, how the beneficiary's
techniques have been adopted in the fields.It is best demonstrated by
preexisting, independent and objective evidence. The record contains no
evidence that the work is of major significance to the field outside of his
immediate circle of collaborators and colleagues. Letters of support alone
are not sufficient to meet this criterion.
II) Totality
He mentioned that I got phd in 2008 and only worked for a short time. The
totality criterion has not met. the director did not mention that I have
nearly 10 years experiences in China, which is very clear in the petition
letter and supporting docs.
【在 g*****3 的大作中提到】
: eb1a 140 pp
: RD: Sep/22
: SLUD: Oct/05
: SLUD: Oct/06
: NOID MAIL RD: Oct/08
: Part I) 3 Criteria to be met
: Claimed 4: 2 accepted; 2 rejected.
: 1) reviewer: accepted.
: 2) authorship: accepted.
: 3) award: rejected,
y*q
13 楼
只能慢慢熬~~
y*e
14 楼
这个百分比如何定?top 10%呢?
answer and explain each question as you mentined here. You need have
confidence to argue that you are on the top of 5% in your field.
【在 b****M 的大作中提到】
: answer and explain each question as you mentined here. You need have
: confidence to argue that you are on the top of 5% in your field.
answer and explain each question as you mentined here. You need have
confidence to argue that you are on the top of 5% in your field.
【在 b****M 的大作中提到】
: answer and explain each question as you mentined here. You need have
: confidence to argue that you are on the top of 5% in your field.
d*y
15 楼
基本没戏,除非人家特意注明至少master,PhD更好
g*0
19 楼
没戏。phd只能竞争team leader这种级别的职位。
b*M
20 楼
整个材料没有组织好,每天花费1小时找模板研读,还有中文律师的文章专门有论述获
奖的,就在本版。
奖的,就在本版。
j*n
21 楼
有绿卡都未必找到
c*e
25 楼
还是转吧。向我这样的,第一个博士后身份没解决,现在找第二个,难上加难。后悔当
初没有干脆不做postdoc了
初没有干脆不做postdoc了
j*t
29 楼
不是over qualify,而是unqualified,因为你没有经验
相关阅读
牛牛们推荐个fixation的办法Review小郁闷了把,editor居然没等到审稿意见返回就决定文章发表与否?有没有去college教书的?separation of sense & antisense strands of DNApaper help!SPSS数据如何输入?怎么从sam文件中判断是single end还是pair end发文章真不是人干的事Elsa R. Flores, MD Anderson Cancer Center谁能给个电子版neuroscience的入门书iPS cells genome 的稳定性A Tragic Tale of Two PostdocsRe: 苦逼的化学 (转载)谁能贴一个美国一流生物研究所/大学的名单吗?请教baculovirus transfectionPaper Help. Thank you very much for your help.4度下保存的gelplate上面的细菌,几个月后甚至几年后形态会变化吗请大家推荐一下phosphatase inhibitor cocktail拿了绿卡对生活有没有实质的改变?诱导型lentivirus shRNA为何没有产病毒?