z*q
2 楼
做RNA-seq有3’bias,这种结果可以被接受吗
g*a
3 楼
回头可能会给你发信要你验证SSN
d*n
4 楼
You probably used polydT to reverse transcrible them into cDNA, then
performed fragmentation. this gives huge bias on 3/utr. not reliable for
expression level, even worse for analysis of exon junctions.But, it'll be
very good for pcpa (premature cleavage and poly adenylation) analysis.
performed fragmentation. this gives huge bias on 3/utr. not reliable for
expression level, even worse for analysis of exon junctions.But, it'll be
very good for pcpa (premature cleavage and poly adenylation) analysis.
b*6
5 楼
还能这样 太贱了
相关阅读
井人<退化论---基因熵与基因组的奥秘>康奈尔大学教授 基因枪发明者所写见怪不怪,我还见过CS转生化的呢有没有今年夏天去woods hole 参加学习班的同学plant Journal paper help申请Pfizer neuroscience postdoc又来求助paper了,真不好意思就要听Mariano Barbacid的talk了包子求篇paper (转载)求助:实验室文章大多超过10个作者Paper Help今天又发了一篇JCP, 但是心里一点都开心不起来(一个化学博后内 (转载)PIERCE的B-PER和Y-PER有什么不同么?谁能access 2001年的武汉大学学报现在生物海龟的有多少可以在国内做独立PI的?科学的最高境界是把一个冷门做成热门转发:中科院遗传发育所农业资源中心“百人计划”招聘关于chromatin immunoprecipitation中的peak value?chinese website on stem cell research生物博后想转读medical school, 大家有什么建议吗?