Redian新闻
>
求建议:optogenetics in invertebrates Perspective Review
avatar
求建议:optogenetics in invertebrates Perspective Review# Biology - 生物学
u*u
1
美西周三晚上七点,就在咱家不需打扮.问题问罢解除困惑,经验秀出价值更添!
Everybody is welcome.
7:00pm California time. Every Wed.
10:00pm New York time, Every Wed.
语音会场: Call in number: 218-862-7200, bridge# 404101
不在美国的朋友,可用Skype参加online听会:
Skype ID: UsaLaoTu
Please set up Skype Connect with USALaoTu.
LaoTu will make your ID join the conference call at meeting time.
Please do not make voice call to USALaoTu at meeting time. Send text message
is OK.
(You will be dis-connected from the meeting automatically if you make voice
call.)
avatar
m*o
2
律师给的特别短。想问问谁能不能贡献一个比较全的清单?
还有是不是EB1-B 和 EB1-A的 差别很大? 后者要求的材料齐全的多?
谢谢了
avatar
k*a
3
【 以下文字转载自 PhotoGear 讨论区 】
发信人: walsams (Jim), 信区: PhotoGear
标 题: iPhone 5 demo照片都是1D拍的。 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 23 18:51:20 2012, 美东)
发信人: aaaty (阿fan提), 信区: Apple
标 题: iPhone 5 demo照片都是1D拍的。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 23 17:52:38 2012, 美东)
看起来很惊艳。但是都不是iPhone 5拍的。
倒是曾经在iMac demo机上看到用3GS拍的惊艳照片。分辨率是不好,但是专业打光补光
avatar
d*r
4
需要写一个关于 using optogenetics in invertebrates 的 Perspective review
大家有什么点子没?
what's going on in this field now?
what are people doing?
where is this all going?
谢啦!
avatar
w*m
5
我倒是觉得EB1B材料多。
EB1A可用的EB1B全都可用

【在 m*******o 的大作中提到】
: 律师给的特别短。想问问谁能不能贡献一个比较全的清单?
: 还有是不是EB1-B 和 EB1-A的 差别很大? 后者要求的材料齐全的多?
: 谢谢了

avatar
c*n
6
多新鲜啊, 谁这么2会用iphone拍广告片?
avatar
s*x
7
基本都是再copy vertibrate 的技术。虽然最早尝试过改造rhodopsin。
做的最多的应该是c elegans,透明好做。而且每个neuron都研究过了。
这方面的reveiw太多,看看最新review,再吧最近的paper summarize 就不错,要有独
到的见解太难了。
avatar
T*n
8
难道他以为是iphone 5拍的?

【在 k****a 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 PhotoGear 讨论区 】
: 发信人: walsams (Jim), 信区: PhotoGear
: 标 题: iPhone 5 demo照片都是1D拍的。 (转载)
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 23 18:51:20 2012, 美东)
: 发信人: aaaty (阿fan提), 信区: Apple
: 标 题: iPhone 5 demo照片都是1D拍的。
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 23 17:52:38 2012, 美东)
: 看起来很惊艳。但是都不是iPhone 5拍的。
: 倒是曾经在iMac demo机上看到用3GS拍的惊艳照片。分辨率是不好,但是专业打光补光

avatar
d*r
9
嗯,谢谢你的comment,不过说基本都是 copy vertebrate 这个不对吧?animal level
最先是在 C.elegans 试的,后来才其他动物。

【在 s********x 的大作中提到】
: 基本都是再copy vertibrate 的技术。虽然最早尝试过改造rhodopsin。
: 做的最多的应该是c elegans,透明好做。而且每个neuron都研究过了。
: 这方面的reveiw太多,看看最新review,再吧最近的paper summarize 就不错,要有独
: 到的见解太难了。

avatar
d*r
10
My thoughts so far:
I think the "uniqueness" of using optogenetics in invertebrates, worms in
particular, is still essentially related to the general advantages of using
this model organism in the first place: transparent, small size, simple
nervous system and genetic screens.
For ephys analysis of synaptic function in dissected preps using
optogenetics, there is no big difference between worms and mice. For whole
animal behavioral studies under light stimulation, worms under a LED is a
lot easier than mice wearing optic fiber implants.
Coupling behavior with EM ultrastructure of course is a unique application
for small transparent invertebrates. You can still use brain slices and
retinal preps etc. to couple stimulation with EM, but there is no direct
link to behavior.
Forward genetic screens with optogenetic stimulations: it seems lots of
people are thinking about this but I am not aware if anyone has done so and
what's the current status.
Neuron-behavior mapping: This is a big one I think. Fly people has been
using optogenetics to randomly stimulate thousands of neuron lines for
activity mapping (Vogelstein et al. 2014 Science). Gaby Maimon lab at
Rockefeller is also doing similar stuff for particular behaviors such as
navigation. C. elegans using cell specific promoters is more straightforward
in this regards. Worm people is thinking about generating strains with
single neuron expression for all 119 neuron classes, so that behavior,
calcium dynamics and even ephys properties can eventually be studied at the
cellular level for the entire nervous system. Such task is certainly only
feasible for worms.
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。