c*a
2 楼
Obama 今天说他对CIR 表示乐观。
个人认为如果Obama能像他对Obama care 那样积极,CIR真有希望过。关键是这次Obama
会不会尽100%的力。
各位如何看?
Link:
http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/president-obama-op
个人认为如果Obama能像他对Obama care 那样积极,CIR真有希望过。关键是这次Obama
会不会尽100%的力。
各位如何看?
Link:
http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/president-obama-op
J*G
3 楼
n*y
4 楼
电脑硬盘突然坏了,发出吱吱是是拉拉的响声。能认出盘符,但是打不开。
请问如何能把里边的文件转移出来?求助!
请问如何能把里边的文件转移出来?求助!
w*r
5 楼
http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
w*l
6 楼
他要是再积极一点估计CIR就黄了
现在形势还凑合就是因为他闭嘴
现在形势还凑合就是因为他闭嘴
y*n
7 楼
好像是说没有了。
我刚买了一套,付快3元的邮费,。。
我刚买了一套,付快3元的邮费,。。
n*m
9 楼
Your probability to become a PI is: 99%
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
D*a
13 楼
Your probability to become a PI is:90%
Your score is greater than that of 85% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
to
【在 n*m 的大作中提到】
: Your probability to become a PI is: 99%
: Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Your score is greater than that of 85% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
to
【在 n*m 的大作中提到】
: Your probability to become a PI is: 99%
: Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
O*L
15 楼
DON'T SHIP TO YOURSELF,
SHip to your wife...
SHip to your wife...
J*i
16 楼
这三年我也坏过两个2TB的硬盘
以后再也不买硬盘了,太容易坏
希望手里的SSD能撑久一点
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
以后再也不买硬盘了,太容易坏
希望手里的SSD能撑久一点
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
d*p
17 楼
Your probability to become a PI is: 70%
g*9
19 楼
我做BT下载已经坏了5块硬盘了。四块都是希捷的,一块西数的。以后希捷再便宜也不
能买。
能买。
A*y
20 楼
I used my publications before I became a PI...74%. So I guess it is a pass.
a*n
23 楼
77%
一看就是扯淡的
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
一看就是扯淡的
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
i*1
25 楼
只看文章就知道能不能找到PI?那倒简单了。应该加上其他很多因素。
D*a
26 楼
PI也分很多种,从欧美到亚非拉,从一流到九流。
s*s
27 楼
well, 我想他把烂校混的PI都算进去了。
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
w*a
28 楼
Your probability to become a PI is: 89%
Your score is greater than that of 85% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
我这样的居然89
有此可见,多少烂PI
Your score is greater than that of 85% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
我这样的居然89
有此可见,多少烂PI
K*4
29 楼
我也很好奇他这个score的意义,好像他上面的解释是错误的。
比如我试了几个established的大牛,他给的是:
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data。
不信你可以试试。
to
【在 w***a 的大作中提到】
: Your probability to become a PI is: 89%
: Your score is greater than that of 85% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: 我这样的居然89
: 有此可见,多少烂PI
比如我试了几个established的大牛,他给的是:
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data。
不信你可以试试。
to
【在 w***a 的大作中提到】
: Your probability to become a PI is: 89%
: Your score is greater than that of 85% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: 我这样的居然89
: 有此可见,多少烂PI
K*4
30 楼
这是另一个PIpredictor:
http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_i
考虑的因素更多些
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_i
考虑的因素更多些
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
K*4
32 楼
不是,我算得是大牛拿到PI位置之前的文章,
Your probability to become a PI is: 98%
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
Feature Value
Number of Publications 20
Number of Publications as First 6
Mean Impact Factor 5.5
Max Impact Factor 36.3
Max IF As First 9.4
高。
【在 D***a 的大作中提到】
: 这个软件只算第一作者的吧,大牛很多年都没有第一作者文章,按此计算分数当然不高。
Your probability to become a PI is: 98%
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
Feature Value
Number of Publications 20
Number of Publications as First 6
Mean Impact Factor 5.5
Max Impact Factor 36.3
Max IF As First 9.4
高。
【在 D***a 的大作中提到】
: 这个软件只算第一作者的吧,大牛很多年都没有第一作者文章,按此计算分数当然不高。
K*4
33 楼
这是另一个的,只算了前四年的
Your probability to become a PI is: 100%
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
Feature Value
Number of Publications 74
Number of Publications as First 37
Mean Impact Factor 9.5
Max Impact Factor 36.3
Max IF As First 31.2
高。
【在 D***a 的大作中提到】
: 这个软件只算第一作者的吧,大牛很多年都没有第一作者文章,按此计算分数当然不高。
Your probability to become a PI is: 100%
Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
Feature Value
Number of Publications 74
Number of Publications as First 37
Mean Impact Factor 9.5
Max Impact Factor 36.3
Max IF As First 31.2
高。
【在 D***a 的大作中提到】
: 这个软件只算第一作者的吧,大牛很多年都没有第一作者文章,按此计算分数当然不高。
w*a
34 楼
这个软件看年头的,这些大牛发文章都是很多年了,他会计算发第一篇到现在的年头
to
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: 这是另一个的,只算了前四年的
: Your probability to become a PI is: 100%
: Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
: Feature Value
: Number of Publications 74
: Number of Publications as First 37
: Mean Impact Factor 9.5
: Max Impact Factor 36.3
to
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: 这是另一个的,只算了前四年的
: Your probability to become a PI is: 100%
: Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
: Feature Value
: Number of Publications 74
: Number of Publications as First 37
: Mean Impact Factor 9.5
: Max Impact Factor 36.3
w*a
35 楼
你只贴上他那几年的文章,软件自认为他从那些年开始到现在只发了这些文章
to
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: 这是另一个的,只算了前四年的
: Your probability to become a PI is: 100%
: Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
: Feature Value
: Number of Publications 74
: Number of Publications as First 37
: Mean Impact Factor 9.5
: Max Impact Factor 36.3
to
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: 这是另一个的,只算了前四年的
: Your probability to become a PI is: 100%
: Your score is greater than that of 5% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
: Feature Value
: Number of Publications 74
: Number of Publications as First 37
: Mean Impact Factor 9.5
: Max Impact Factor 36.3
S*J
36 楼
Your score is greater than that of 95% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
有意思的是,你选择性别会有很大影响,哈哈。
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
有意思的是,你选择性别会有很大影响,哈哈。
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
K*4
37 楼
你的解释不对,这是我输入的另一个,performance不好的。注意到下面的一行:Your
score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data!!!这个75%显然是不可
能的!!!
Your probability to become a PI is: 82%
Your score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
Feature Value
Number of Publications 9
Number of Publications as First 7
Mean Impact Factor 3.2
Max Impact Factor 4.7
Max IF As First 4.7
【在 w***a 的大作中提到】
: 你只贴上他那几年的文章,软件自认为他从那些年开始到现在只发了这些文章
:
: to
score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data!!!这个75%显然是不可
能的!!!
Your probability to become a PI is: 82%
Your score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data, while compared to
non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
Feature Value
Number of Publications 9
Number of Publications as First 7
Mean Impact Factor 3.2
Max Impact Factor 4.7
Max IF As First 4.7
【在 w***a 的大作中提到】
: 你只贴上他那几年的文章,软件自认为他从那些年开始到现在只发了这些文章
:
: to
w*a
38 楼
但是成为PI的百分比是对的
Your
to
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: 你的解释不对,这是我输入的另一个,performance不好的。注意到下面的一行:Your
: score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data!!!这个75%显然是不可
: 能的!!!
: Your probability to become a PI is: 82%
: Your score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
: Feature Value
: Number of Publications 9
: Number of Publications as First 7
Your
to
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: 你的解释不对,这是我输入的另一个,performance不好的。注意到下面的一行:Your
: score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data!!!这个75%显然是不可
: 能的!!!
: Your probability to become a PI is: 82%
: Your score is greater than that of 75% of PIs in our data, while compared to
: non-PIs, you outscore 95% of them (i.e., false discovery rate of 5%)
: Here are some of the statistics we computed from your publication history:
: Feature Value
: Number of Publications 9
: Number of Publications as First 7
K*4
39 楼
Crazy, just read the paper of it.
It is published in CELL.
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2814%29
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
It is published in CELL.
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2814%29
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
w*a
40 楼
lol
based on data from over 25,000 scientists in PubMed. 看来不是任何PI都算进来的
不错,估计主编看了直接过了,也没法审稿
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: Crazy, just read the paper of it.
: It is published in CELL.
: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2814%29
based on data from over 25,000 scientists in PubMed. 看来不是任何PI都算进来的
不错,估计主编看了直接过了,也没法审稿
【在 K**4 的大作中提到】
: Crazy, just read the paper of it.
: It is published in CELL.
: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2814%29
B*l
41 楼
Ops, the lz forgot to state: anything less than 99.9% = fail.
T*i
44 楼
惨,只有87% 和95%。没戏了。
话说,他这个数字应该这样解读:
比x%的发考题强,没有意义,人家站了位置,你再强也不能把人踢下来吧?能踢下来的
也是AP,可即使是AP也和找工作的千老地位不对等。
比X%的千老强,有点意义。但你得知道,现在的opening和千老的比例肯定低于10%(
以我们这的opening 和千老数量估计),而作为中国人,这个比例可能只有3%。
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
话说,他这个数字应该这样解读:
比x%的发考题强,没有意义,人家站了位置,你再强也不能把人踢下来吧?能踢下来的
也是AP,可即使是AP也和找工作的千老地位不对等。
比X%的千老强,有点意义。但你得知道,现在的opening和千老的比例肯定低于10%(
以我们这的opening 和千老数量估计),而作为中国人,这个比例可能只有3%。
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
v*e
45 楼
只要说我是个黑人千老,肯定100% PI。
s*j
48 楼
我看应该开发一个 iq predicator
看看做什么研究的对智商伤害最大.
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
看看做什么研究的对智商伤害最大.
【在 w***r 的大作中提到】
: http://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/PIPredictor/predict.php
: Predict your probability to become a Principal Investigator (PI)
相关阅读
Breaking news: 老鼠怕男人,但是不怕女人求助,如何选择offer心血管杂志审稿机会!!Paper help!咨询生物千老工资水平有人熟悉3p-seq吗?为什么肝细胞会有两个细胞核?teaching statement祝贺华大基因探索肿瘤的第二个共性!美国和国内offer的量化比较 (转载)国内最著名的生物研究所是什么关于细胞成像的样品制备,跪求建议帮忙分析research area 选择how to concentrate protein with high recovery?请问有人用过Agilent AAV helper free system吗?求助DNA测序结果分析软件请教关于 KIR2DL2NEJM副主编到底有多牛?postdoctoral position哪个公司的WB dry transfer system比较好用?