w*6
2 楼
I closed my house on Monday, the sellers brought all the documents they had
(most from their previous owner) and we found out some unexpected things:
1. The roof was advertised to be replaced in 2008. The document said the
replacement happened in 2006. The listing agent apologized and insisted that
by law we can do nothing.
2. A water main broke in 2008, affected multiple houses on the street
including the one we bought. I encountered the letter addressed to residents
on the street from the city during closing and the seller told me that the
flood affected other houses on the street but not this one. After we got
home, I went through all the documents carefully and found a record with the
details of the flood which affected over 20% of one wall of the basement.
The basement, laundry room, and office at the low level were all cleaned by
a professional company. The flood happened before they bought the house (
they bought it in Mar. 2009, the flood happened in Oct. 2008). I believe
both the sellers and the agent (she bought the house for them, too) knew
this fact. But nothing was disclosed on the disclosure form. The inspection
without knowledge of previous flooding history did not reveal any warning
sign then.
We are certainly unhappy about the things we discovered after we signed all
documents. We are concerned whether this will affect the foundation and the
value of the house. I went on a business trip after closing and have not
got chance to consult anybody yet. Would like to hear from you guys what we
should do. We are in Michigan, if there is any realtor or real estate
attorney here who knows Michigan law, welcome to comment.
(most from their previous owner) and we found out some unexpected things:
1. The roof was advertised to be replaced in 2008. The document said the
replacement happened in 2006. The listing agent apologized and insisted that
by law we can do nothing.
2. A water main broke in 2008, affected multiple houses on the street
including the one we bought. I encountered the letter addressed to residents
on the street from the city during closing and the seller told me that the
flood affected other houses on the street but not this one. After we got
home, I went through all the documents carefully and found a record with the
details of the flood which affected over 20% of one wall of the basement.
The basement, laundry room, and office at the low level were all cleaned by
a professional company. The flood happened before they bought the house (
they bought it in Mar. 2009, the flood happened in Oct. 2008). I believe
both the sellers and the agent (she bought the house for them, too) knew
this fact. But nothing was disclosed on the disclosure form. The inspection
without knowledge of previous flooding history did not reveal any warning
sign then.
We are certainly unhappy about the things we discovered after we signed all
documents. We are concerned whether this will affect the foundation and the
value of the house. I went on a business trip after closing and have not
got chance to consult anybody yet. Would like to hear from you guys what we
should do. We are in Michigan, if there is any realtor or real estate
attorney here who knows Michigan law, welcome to comment.
n*t
3 楼
马上要停止升级了
d*b
4 楼
前几年大家提起来生物最多是抱怨抱怨就业差,干的时间长。
现在国内外的bbs提起生物更多的不屑地称生物是骗子学科,传销学科。做的东西胡编
乱造居多,现在很多人看生物教授的眼光和看骗子和中介没有啥区别了。
现在国内外的bbs提起生物更多的不屑地称生物是骗子学科,传销学科。做的东西胡编
乱造居多,现在很多人看生物教授的眼光和看骗子和中介没有啥区别了。
b*r
5 楼
should be one-side.
l*o
6 楼
当初我的agent和我说如果卖家的disclosure和事实不符的话我可以sue他们。
你问问你的agent和你的closing用的律师?
had
the
that
residents
the
the
【在 w********6 的大作中提到】
: I closed my house on Monday, the sellers brought all the documents they had
: (most from their previous owner) and we found out some unexpected things:
: 1. The roof was advertised to be replaced in 2008. The document said the
: replacement happened in 2006. The listing agent apologized and insisted that
: by law we can do nothing.
: 2. A water main broke in 2008, affected multiple houses on the street
: including the one we bought. I encountered the letter addressed to residents
: on the street from the city during closing and the seller told me that the
: flood affected other houses on the street but not this one. After we got
: home, I went through all the documents carefully and found a record with the
你问问你的agent和你的closing用的律师?
had
the
that
residents
the
the
【在 w********6 的大作中提到】
: I closed my house on Monday, the sellers brought all the documents they had
: (most from their previous owner) and we found out some unexpected things:
: 1. The roof was advertised to be replaced in 2008. The document said the
: replacement happened in 2006. The listing agent apologized and insisted that
: by law we can do nothing.
: 2. A water main broke in 2008, affected multiple houses on the street
: including the one we bought. I encountered the letter addressed to residents
: on the street from the city during closing and the seller told me that the
: flood affected other houses on the street but not this one. After we got
: home, I went through all the documents carefully and found a record with the
b*M
9 楼
单面。
a*l
10 楼
I don't think you can do anything yet. Have someone check your house with
your new information to see how bad it is.
You can complaint about the listing agent to local real estate board. But it
may cost you more money to sue them and you have to prove your lost
financially. Emotion lost will not count.
That is how I feel, you should talk to your closing attorney or get some
legal advice.
your new information to see how bad it is.
You can complaint about the listing agent to local real estate board. But it
may cost you more money to sue them and you have to prove your lost
financially. Emotion lost will not count.
That is how I feel, you should talk to your closing attorney or get some
legal advice.
l*s
11 楼
一个免费的产品还要这么强推,微软搞的跟绝望主妇似的,有必要么
K*o
13 楼
我的律师是双面打印 已经批了 但是好像听说必须单面 公司的美国律师很多做法和板
上说的不一样 还好最后通过了
上说的不一样 还好最后通过了
w*6
14 楼
Thank you for your input. If we don't do anything now, can we still sue them
later on if something associated with previous flooding really happens (
such as foundation problem)?
later on if something associated with previous flooding really happens (
such as foundation problem)?
N*s
18 楼
If it was a disclaimer type of disclosue (let buyer beware) then you cannot
do anything.
Thank you for your input. If we don't do anything now, can we still sue them
later on if........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs 6.0 - iPhone Lite
【在 w********6 的大作中提到】
: Thank you for your input. If we don't do anything now, can we still sue them
: later on if something associated with previous flooding really happens (
: such as foundation problem)?
do anything.
Thank you for your input. If we don't do anything now, can we still sue them
later on if........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs 6.0 - iPhone Lite
【在 w********6 的大作中提到】
: Thank you for your input. If we don't do anything now, can we still sue them
: later on if something associated with previous flooding really happens (
: such as foundation problem)?
s*i
19 楼
不会忽悠的连论文都发不出来,早就离开这个圈子了
H*i
21 楼
现在说人学生物那是骂人的话,最恶毒的是“你们全家都是学生物的”,连下一代都不
给活路了。
给活路了。
相关阅读
学科发展阶段的判断标准 (转载)求推荐做Southern Blot的gDNA extract kitabout nature communication figure preparation发包子,求paper一篇,谢谢!小保方晴子愤怒回应拟申诉:正在复制结果,需要一定时间请教SB 203580在细胞里不inhibit反而active p38 MAPK是什么可能?有人接到武大的通知没?哪个公司的NC膜做western用Odyssey背景低一些?Sunney Xie 的实验室容易去呆一段时间吗?Re: 生物博后转行cs吐槽先修课 (转载)p16, p21, p53 antibody on IF staining?The Atlantic报道:生物化学已不如文科zzpaper help! thanksChIPseq做出来的binding target 在knockdown时的RNAseq和Microarray中都没变化请教牛牛们一个talen问题请教一个HSV-TK selection的问题生物实验室的运作模式祝贺一公获得爱明诺夫奖,新闻1+1专题报道用科学检验传说,油脂与健康之——胆固醇导师问文章(笑话一则)