Redian新闻
>
刚拿到K08的impact score,分数如何? (转载)
avatar
刚拿到K08的impact score,分数如何? (转载)# Biology - 生物学
p*t
1
我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
evidence is seeking to establish.
Follow the tips below for how to organize your evidence:
Provide all required documentation and evidence with the petition when filed
. Form I-140 petitions may be denied without issuing a request for evidence
in the instances where the required evidence described in the instructions
and regulations are not initially provided.
If providing photocopies of documents, please provide clear legible copies.
(Note: Original DOL-approved labor certifications, signed by the petitioner,
alien and representative, if any, must be submitted if they are required by
the visa category.)
All foreign language documents must be submitted with a corresponding
English translation. The English translation must be certified by a
translator who is competent to translate and must verify in writing that "
the translation is true and accurate to the best of the translator's
abilities." It is helpful if the English translation is stapled to the
foreign language document.
If the alien beneficiary may be entitled to an earlier priority date based
on a previously approved Form I-140 petition, please provide a statement to
that affect, along with a copy of the Form I-797 approval notice for the
previous petition. (See 8 C.F.R. 204.5(e))
If documenting the alien's publications or citations of the alien
beneficiary's work, please highlight the alien's name in the relevant
articles. It is not necessary to send the full copy of a dissertation,
thesis, or research paper written by the alien beneficiary, or one in which
the alien beneficiary's work has been cited. Include the title page and the
portion(s) that cite the alien's work and the "works cited" or bibliography.
Tab and label the evidentiary exhibits at the bottom of the first page of
each exhibit, and provide a list of the evidentiary exhibits and the
eligibility criteria that each exhibit is submitted to establish for
petitions supported by a substantial amount of documentation. An exhibit
that is being provided to meet multiple eligibility criteria should be so
identified in the exhibit list.
In the case of:
E11, Alien of Extraordinary Ability petitions (Form I-140, Part 2. option a.)
Identify which of the ten regulatory criteria the alien is attempting to
satisfy and the relevant evidence for each individual criterion.
Provide a statement and evidence that the alien beneficiary is coming to the
U.S. to continue to be employed in his/her area of sustained national or
international acclaim. (See 8 C.F.R. 204.5(h).)
3。如何装订:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e
avatar
p*e
2
突然发现gas fireplace不能turn on,不知道是什么原因
avatar
z*u
3
【 以下文字转载自 Faculty 讨论区 】
发信人: zhaohu (天外飞猪), 信区: Faculty
标 题: 刚拿到K08的impact score,分数如何?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 27 16:33:19 2014, 美东)
NIDCR的K08. impact score 30分。不知道咋样?有人说K grant不会有percentile
information 出来。到RePort查了往年的funding success rate. 2013年 33%, 2012
年43%,2011年42%。
觉得我这个分数有戏吗?
avatar
h*3
4
赞!这个太好了!
avatar
b*a
5
有很多原因

【在 p********e 的大作中提到】
: 突然发现gas fireplace不能turn on,不知道是什么原因
avatar
b*r
6
赞,但并不是每个律师都SUCKS,我的弱CASE批了很大程度是律师的功劳!凡事不是绝
对的。
avatar
p*t
7
你的也许对。但我相信你的Case仔细做功课并不弱。不符合要求的Case再包装也没用。
DIY在EB1A相对容易,因为现在标准比较清晰了。
DIY还有个优点是自己掌握时间,我花了一周就file了EB1A, 当然我有办NIW时现成的
东西,按EB1A修改并Update就行了。
还有你比律师更懂自己专业,写Contribution更靠谱。律师会帮你查ISI,Google?大
部分事情还是要自己做的。
数年前我被律师害过,惨痛教训啊,所以比较偏激。
总之,如果你有写Paper的逻辑思维,可以DIY,认真去做并不难。
也祝贺你,碰上了靠谱律师。

【在 b*********r 的大作中提到】
: 赞,但并不是每个律师都SUCKS,我的弱CASE批了很大程度是律师的功劳!凡事不是绝
: 对的。

avatar
b*r
8
嗯,在理,同意。也恭喜你!!

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 你的也许对。但我相信你的Case仔细做功课并不弱。不符合要求的Case再包装也没用。
: DIY在EB1A相对容易,因为现在标准比较清晰了。
: DIY还有个优点是自己掌握时间,我花了一周就file了EB1A, 当然我有办NIW时现成的
: 东西,按EB1A修改并Update就行了。
: 还有你比律师更懂自己专业,写Contribution更靠谱。律师会帮你查ISI,Google?大
: 部分事情还是要自己做的。
: 数年前我被律师害过,惨痛教训啊,所以比较偏激。
: 总之,如果你有写Paper的逻辑思维,可以DIY,认真去做并不难。
: 也祝贺你,碰上了靠谱律师。

avatar
p*3
9
Zan!
avatar
n*p
10
Will you please further elaborate:
what kind of cases are 不符合要求的Case,
and what kind of cases are 符合要求的Case,
Do you have a rough criterion?
Thank you!

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 你的也许对。但我相信你的Case仔细做功课并不弱。不符合要求的Case再包装也没用。
: DIY在EB1A相对容易,因为现在标准比较清晰了。
: DIY还有个优点是自己掌握时间,我花了一周就file了EB1A, 当然我有办NIW时现成的
: 东西,按EB1A修改并Update就行了。
: 还有你比律师更懂自己专业,写Contribution更靠谱。律师会帮你查ISI,Google?大
: 部分事情还是要自己做的。
: 数年前我被律师害过,惨痛教训啊,所以比较偏激。
: 总之,如果你有写Paper的逻辑思维,可以DIY,认真去做并不难。
: 也祝贺你,碰上了靠谱律师。

avatar
p*t
11
You sould look at the first link for criteria.
简单地说, 要有证据:
1. 符合三条.
2. “sustained" national or international acclaim,
3. You are in very small percent Top.
2.&3. are based on the quality of 1.
Part One Note: Objectively meeting the regulatory criteria in part one alone
does not establish that the alien in fact meets the requirements for
classification as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability under section 203(b)(1)(
A) of the INA.
For example:
Participating in the judging of the work of others in the same or an allied
field of specialization alone, regardless of the circumstances, should
satisfy the regulatory criteria in part one. However, for the analysis in
part two, the alien’s participation should be evaluated to determine
whether it was indicative of the alien being one of that small percentage
who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor and enjoying
sustained national or international acclaim.
Publishing scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or
other major media alone, regardless of the caliber, should satisfy the
regulatory criteria in part one. However, for the analysis in part two, the
alien’s publications should be evaluated to determine whether they were
indicative of the alien being one of that small percentage who have risen to
the very top of the field of endeavor and enjoying sustained national or
international acclaim.
The issue related to whether the alien is one of that small percentage who
have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor and enjoys sustained
national or international acclaim should be addressed and articulated in
part two of the analysis, not in part one where the USCIS officer is only
required to determine if the evidence objectively meets the regulatory
criteria.
Part Two: Final Merits Determination. Meeting the minimum requirement of
providing required initial evidence does not, in itself, establish that the
alien in fact meets the requirements for classification as an alien of
extraordinary ability under section 203(b)(1)(A) of the INA. As part of the
final merits determination, the quality of the evidence also should be
considered, such as whether the judging responsibilities were internal and
whether the scholarly articles (if inherent to the occupation) are cited by
others in the field.
In Part Two of the analysis in each case, USCIS officers should evaluate the
evidence together when considering the petition in its entirety to make a
final merits determination of whether or not the petitioner, by a
preponderance of the evidence, has demonstrated that the alien has sustained
national or international acclaim and that his or her achievements have
been recognized in the field of expertise, indicating that the alien is one
of that small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field of
endeavor.
PM-602-0005.1: Evaluation of Evidence Submitted with Certain Form I-140
Petitions; Revisions
to the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 22.2, AFM Update AD11-14
Page 14
If the USCIS officer determines that the petitioner has failed to
demonstrate these requirements, the USCIS officer should not merely make
general assertions regarding this failure. Rather, the USCIS officer must
articulate the specific reasons as to why the USCIS officer concludes that
the petitioner, by a preponderance of the evidence, has not demonstrated
that the alien is an alien of extraordinary ability under section 203(b)(1)(
A) of the INA.
 2. The introductory language of paragraph (1)(E) of Chapter 22.2(i)
of the AFM is revised to read as follows:
(E) Sustained National or International Acclaim. Under 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3), a
petition for an alien of extraordinary ability must be accompanied by
evidence that the alien has sustained national or international acclaim and
that the alien's achievements have been recognized in the field of expertise
. In determining whether the beneficiary has enjoyed “sustained" national
or international acclaim, bear in mind that such acclaim must be maintained.
(According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 1585 (9th Ed, 2009), the definition
of sustain is “(1) to support or maintain, especially over a long period of
time; 6. To persist in making (an effort) over a long period of time.”)
However, the word “sustained” does not imply an age limit on the
beneficiary. A beneficiary may be very young in his or her career and still
be able to show sustained acclaim. There is also no definitive time frame on
what constitutes “sustained.” If an alien was recognized for a particular
achievement, the USCIS officer should determine whether the alien continues
to maintain a comparable level of acclaim in the field of expertise since
the alien was originally afforded that recognition. An alien may have
achieved national or international acclaim in the past but then failed to
maintain a comparable level of acclaim thereafter.

【在 n******p 的大作中提到】
: Will you please further elaborate:
: what kind of cases are 不符合要求的Case,
: and what kind of cases are 符合要求的Case,
: Do you have a rough criterion?
: Thank you!

avatar
f*h
12
赞楼主! 这个贴要加精, 我收常藏了.
avatar
l*0
13
楼主写的真是太好了。我正在回复EB1A的RFE,有几个问题想请楼主指教:
1.如何查杂志的download次数,或者点击率?来证明该杂志的影响广泛?
2.可否把2个不同的领域合并,以提高该杂志的排名,看起来更加top,IO会注意到吗?
3.回复RFE有没有固定的模式?
4.第一次submission的材料有必要都再submit吗?
5.可以用5-year的impact factor来rank杂志吗?这样能看起来更top.
6.可以用total cites来rank杂志吗?IO懂吗?
非常急于看到楼主的回复,深表感谢!

DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
USCIS。
章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
the
of

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
: 1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
: 2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
: Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
: petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
: A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
: should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
: evidence is seeking to establish.

avatar
p*t
14
1.如何查杂志的download次数,或者点击率?来证明该杂志的影响广泛?
Journal website: About this journal or journal information/statistics page.
Some journal doesn't have these information.
2.可否把2个不同的领域合并,以提高该杂志的排名,看起来更加top,IO会注意到吗?
3.回复RFE有没有固定的模式?No.
4.第一次submission的材料有必要都再submit吗?
If you need to remind IO or believe IO ignored.
5.可以用5-year的impact factor来rank杂志吗?这样能看起来更top.
6.可以用total cites来rank杂志吗?IO懂吗?
For 2,5,6: Whatever ranking, give the source page!
Good luck!
avatar
l*0
15
非常感谢楼主的回复

DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
USCIS。
章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
the
of

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
: 1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
: 2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
: Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
: petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
: A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
: should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
: evidence is seeking to establish.

avatar
J*L
16
xiexie
收藏!!

DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
USCIS。
章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
the
of

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
: 1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
: 2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
: Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
: petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
: A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
: should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
: evidence is seeking to establish.

avatar
n*p
17
Thank you!
But for people with few paper and very few citations, it is hard to prove
that
the alien being one of that small percentage who have risen to
the very top of the field of endeavor and enjoying sustained national or
international acclaim.
Any other rescue?

alone
)(

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: You sould look at the first link for criteria.
: 简单地说, 要有证据:
: 1. 符合三条.
: 2. “sustained" national or international acclaim,
: 3. You are in very small percent Top.
: 2.&3. are based on the quality of 1.
: Part One Note: Objectively meeting the regulatory criteria in part one alone
: does not establish that the alien in fact meets the requirements for
: classification as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability under section 203(b)(1)(
: A) of the INA.

avatar
h*x
18
好贴收藏了

DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
USCIS。
章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
the
of

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
: 1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
: 2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
: Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
: petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
: A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
: should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
: evidence is seeking to establish.

avatar
p*t
19
1. Try to say compare with peers at the same level with you.
2. Accept rate for journals publish your paper?
3. Reviewer's comments on your paper when you sunmitted?
4. Sigma XI member? that is 60000 out of 6000000 total scientists over world
(1%)
5. Are citations from other contry?

【在 n******p 的大作中提到】
: Thank you!
: But for people with few paper and very few citations, it is hard to prove
: that
: the alien being one of that small percentage who have risen to
: the very top of the field of endeavor and enjoying sustained national or
: international acclaim.
: Any other rescue?
:
: alone
: )(

avatar
n*p
20
Is Sigma XI member? that is 60000 out of 6000000 total scientists over world
I am a full member but I didn't find this evidence.
Citations from other countries are for a recently published second-author
paper.
world
avatar
n*p
21
Where did you get 60000 out of 6000000 total scientists?
Is Sigma Xi still a useful evidence?
Many posts here said not to use it.
Did you cliaim membership based on it?

world

【在 n******p 的大作中提到】
: Is Sigma XI member? that is 60000 out of 6000000 total scientists over world
: I am a full member but I didn't find this evidence.
: Citations from other countries are for a recently published second-author
: paper.
: world

avatar
p*t
22
1. Google "how many scientists in the world", Sigma XI site should have total
member number. Print both. Also give the 200 scientists list who won Nobel
Prize from Sigma XI. As well as membership criteria.
2. Make sure give evidence not after your PD.


world

【在 n******p 的大作中提到】
: Is Sigma XI member? that is 60000 out of 6000000 total scientists over world
: I am a full member but I didn't find this evidence.
: Citations from other countries are for a recently published second-author
: paper.
: world

avatar
n*p
23
Good job. Many Thanks.
Did you really claim it?
I am wondering whether the officer will acknowledge it.
Many posts here said the officers didn't take it.

total
Nobel

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 1. Google "how many scientists in the world", Sigma XI site should have total
: member number. Print both. Also give the 200 scientists list who won Nobel
: Prize from Sigma XI. As well as membership criteria.
: 2. Make sure give evidence not after your PD.
:
:
: world

avatar
p*t
24
I didn't do it, but I saw one guy here did it. I have enough other evidences
to use.
I think IO may not take it if you claim adanced membership, but you can
argue it in final merit.

【在 n******p 的大作中提到】
: Good job. Many Thanks.
: Did you really claim it?
: I am wondering whether the officer will acknowledge it.
: Many posts here said the officers didn't take it.
:
: total
: Nobel

avatar
l*0
25
我发现我的citation随时间增长的figure不好,08,09年是升高趋势,10年有所下降,
怎么去说明持续增长啊?有没有其他的方法说明citation increse with year?非常感
谢!

DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
USCIS。
章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
the
of

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
: 1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
: 2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
: Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
: petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
: A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
: should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
: evidence is seeking to establish.

avatar
p*t
26
这点是为支持Sustained Acclaims, USCIS是这样说的:
the definition of sustain is “(1) to support or maintain, especially over a
long period of time; 6. To persist in making (an effort) over a long period
of time.”) 。。 If an alien was recognized for a particular achievement,
the USCIS officer should determine whether the alien continues to maintain a
comparable level of acclaim in the field of expertise since the alien was
originally afforded that recognition.
所以只要持续,不需要增长。

【在 l****0 的大作中提到】
: 我发现我的citation随时间增长的figure不好,08,09年是升高趋势,10年有所下降,
: 怎么去说明持续增长啊?有没有其他的方法说明citation increse with year?非常感
: 谢!
:
: DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
: USCIS。
: 章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: ,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
: 文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!

avatar
l*0
27
假设我的文章07年引用6个,08年10个,09年16个,10年8个,11年5个,都有引用,但
有下降趋势,也可以吗?谢谢。

evidences

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: I didn't do it, but I saw one guy here did it. I have enough other evidences
: to use.
: I think IO may not take it if you claim adanced membership, but you can
: argue it in final merit.

avatar
n*p
28
The question from the immigration officer will be:
You are counting the total scientists, not the field of endeavor.
Could we claim the field of endeavor as broad as Science?
Thanks!

total
Nobel

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 1. Google "how many scientists in the world", Sigma XI site should have total
: member number. Print both. Also give the 200 scientists list who won Nobel
: Prize from Sigma XI. As well as membership criteria.
: 2. Make sure give evidence not after your PD.
:
:
: world

avatar
f*e
29
Thanks for sharing
avatar
n*1
30
顶~~
功德无量啊~~~

DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自
USCIS。
章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用
文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
the
of

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY (NSC),没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求,远离律师!
: 在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多, IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
: 1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline, 要精读, 这里面对怎样给文章,Review, Contribution等都有明确界定:
: http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
: 2。如何组织你的材料, 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找,要精炼,编号,目录,按PL顺序,并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了: 都用复印件,论文和引用文不用给全文!(为保险起见,我给了一篇自己的全文作样本)能省多少Page啊!
: Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize the evidence with the
: petition? [Answer Finalized on 06/30/09]
: A. The various categories of evidence provided in support of the petition
: should be grouped according to the area of eligibility that the category of
: evidence is seeking to establish.

avatar
a*a
31
mark
avatar
m*3
32
强帖留名。。。顶
avatar
z*8
33
Thanks for sharing!
avatar
H*g
34
mark
avatar
p*t
35
Updated!
avatar
c*i
36
不得不顶

【在 p*******t 的大作中提到】
: Updated!
avatar
I*t
37
ding
avatar
y*1
38
many thanks
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。