这到底算靠谱吗?楼主回国了? Not surprisingly we found a direct correlation (R2=0.8) between the amount of bacterial DNA in the samples and the proportion of reads that did not map to the human reference genome (see the chart below). For the blood samples, which were confirmed via qPCR to contain virtually no bacterial DNA, an average of 4% of reads did not align to the human reference and this value was used as a background correction for all samples. For the Oragene/saliva samples, 5.3% of the total reads, on average, after background correction, were unmapped. In the “worst case scenario” sample (bacterial content of 40.3%), 9.9% of the reads did not map to the reference. Interestingly, for all samples, the amount of unmapped reads is lower than the % bacterial DNA estimated by qPCR
【在 t**x 的大作中提到】 : 这到底算靠谱吗?楼主回国了? : Not surprisingly we found a direct correlation (R2=0.8) between the amount : of bacterial DNA in the samples and the proportion of reads that did not map : to the human reference genome (see the chart below). For the blood samples, : which were confirmed via qPCR to contain virtually no bacterial DNA, an : average of 4% of reads did not align to the human reference and this value : was used as a background correction for all samples. For the Oragene/saliva : samples, 5.3% of the total reads, on average, after background correction, : were unmapped. In the “worst case scenario” sample (bacterial content of : 40.3%), 9.9% of the reads did not map to the reference. Interestingly, for
这到底算靠谱吗?楼主回国了? Not surprisingly we found a direct correlation (R2=0.8) between the amount of bacterial DNA in the samples and the proportion of reads that did not map to the human reference genome (see the chart below). For the blood samples, which were confirmed via qPCR to contain virtually no bacterial DNA, an average of 4% of reads did not align to the human reference and this value was used as a background correction for all samples. For the Oragene/saliva samples, 5.3% of the total reads, on average, after background correction, were unmapped. In the “worst case scenario” sample (bacterial content of 40.3%), 9.9% of the reads did not map to the reference. Interestingly, for all samples, the amount of unmapped reads is lower than the % bacterial DNA estimated by qPCR
【在 t**x 的大作中提到】 : 这到底算靠谱吗?楼主回国了? : Not surprisingly we found a direct correlation (R2=0.8) between the amount : of bacterial DNA in the samples and the proportion of reads that did not map : to the human reference genome (see the chart below). For the blood samples, : which were confirmed via qPCR to contain virtually no bacterial DNA, an : average of 4% of reads did not align to the human reference and this value : was used as a background correction for all samples. For the Oragene/saliva : samples, 5.3% of the total reads, on average, after background correction, : were unmapped. In the “worst case scenario” sample (bacterial content of : 40.3%), 9.9% of the reads did not map to the reference. Interestingly, for